Tracking Chinese newspaper coverage of elephant ivory through topic modeling.

Mass media worldwide has contributed to increasing awareness of the illegal wildlife trade and its significant impact on wildlife conservation. We used mass media coverage as a proxy for macro-level public opinion to analyze the media framing of elephant ivory in 6394 Chinese newspaper articles published from 2000 to 2021 and thus determine the effects of wildlife policies on public opinion. We focused on 2 events: the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) approval of China as a trading partner in the purchase and import of ivory stockpiles from Africa in July 2008 and the Chinese government's announcement of a domestic ivory ban in December 2016. Using latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling, we identified 8 topics about elephant ivory and grouped them into 3 frames: ivory arts and culture, ivory crimes, and elephant conservation. Over the last 2 decades, topics related to ivory crimes remained the most prevalent in news articles. Topics about ivory arts and culture showed a significant shift in media salience before and after the 2 events (from 0.44 to 0.19 and from 0.08 to 0.15, respectively, p < 0.05), whereas the other 2 frames did not change significantly. Contrary to popular belief, our results indicated that Chinese macro-level public opinion on ivory had become more negative following the CITES approval of ivory importation and less negative after the ivory ban announcement, at least for certain periods. The relationship between mass media, public opinion, and wildlife trade policies is complex and requires further examination of the sociopolitical dynamics that influence media narratives. Our results showed the value of topic modeling in monitoring and assessing media representations of wildlife issues in the era of big data. Conservationists should remain vigilant of mass media coverage and collaborate with media practitioners to produce comprehensive narratives on wildlife issues if resources permit.

Los medios masivos han contribuido a una mayor conciencia mundial del mercado ilegal de fauna y el impacto significativo que tiene sobre la conservación. Usamos la cobertura de los medios masivos como sustituto de la opinión pública a nivel macro para analizar el encuadre mediático que le dan al marfil 6,394 artículos publicados en periódicos chinos entre el 2000 y 2021 para así determinar los efectos que tienen las políticas de fauna sobre la opinión pública. Nos enfocamos en dos eventos: la autorización que dio la Convención sobre el Comercio Internacional de Especies Amenazadas (CITES) a China como socio comercial en la compra e importación de reservas de marfil desde África en julio de 2008 y la prohibición doméstica de marfil anunciada por el gobierno chino en diciembre de 2016. Usamos el modelado de asignación latente de Dirichlet para identificar ocho temas sobre el marfil y los agrupamos en tres encuadres: arte y cultura del marfil, crimen del marfil y conservación de elefantes. Durante las últimas dos décadas, los temas relacionados con los crímenes del marfil fueron los más prevalentes en los artículos periodísticos. Los temas relacionados al arte y cultura del marfil mostraron un cambio significativo en la relevancia mediática antes y después de los dos eventos (de 0.44 a 0.19 y de 0.08 a 0.15, respectivamente, p<0.05), mientras que los otros dos encuadres no cambiaron significativamente. Contrario a las creencias populares, nuestros resultados indicaron que la opinión pública a nivel macro sobre el marfil en China se ha vuelto más negativa después de la autorización de CITES y menos negativa después de la prohibición del marfil, al menos durante ciertos periodos. La relación entre los medios masivos, la opinión pública y las políticas del comercio de fauna es compleja y requiere un análisis más profundo de las dinámicas sociopolíticas que influyen sobre las narrativas mediáticas. Nuestros resultados muestran el valor del modelado de temas en el monitoreo y evaluación de la representación en medios de los temas sobre fauna en tiempos de los macrodatos. Los conservacionistas deberían permanecer atentos a la cobertura de los medios masivos y colaborar con los profesionales de los medios para producir narraciones completas sobre la fauna si los recursos lo permiten.

Governance Challenges in Joint Inter-Jurisdictional Management: The Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, Elk Case.

The controversial elk reduction program (elk hunt) in Grand Teton National Park, WY, has been a source of conflict since it was legislated in 1950. The hunt is jointly managed by the National Park Service and the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. This forced organizational partnership and the conflicting mandates of these two agencies have led to persistent conflict that seems irresolvable under the current decision-making process. To better understand the decision-making process and participant perspectives, we reviewed management documents, technical literature, and newspaper articles, and interviewed 35 key participants in this case. We used these data to analyze and appraise the adequacy of the decision-making process for the park elk hunt and to ask whether it reflects the common interest. We found deficiencies in all functions of the decision-making process. Neither the decisions made nor the process itself include diverse perspectives, nor do they attend to valid and appropriate participant concerns. Agency officials focus their attention on technical rather than procedural concerns, which largely obfuscates the underlying tension in the joint inter-jurisdictional management arrangement and ultimately contributes to the hunt's annual implementation to the detriment of the common interest. We offer specific yet widely applicable recommendations to better approximate an inclusive and democratic decision-making process that serves the community's common interests.

College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 2): strategies for improvement.

Environmental studies and environmental sciences programs in American and Canadian colleges and universities seek to ameliorate environmental problems through empirical enquiry and analytic judgment. In a companion article (Part 1) we describe the environmental program movement (EPM) and discuss factors that have hindered its performance. Here, we complete our analysis by proposing strategies for improvement. We recommend that environmental programs re-organize around three principles. First, adopt as an overriding goal the concept of human dignity-defined as freedom and social justice in healthy, sustainable environments. This clear higher-order goal captures the human and environmental aspirations of the EPM and would provide a more coherent direction for the efforts of diverse participants. Second, employ an explicit, genuinely interdisciplinary analytical framework that facilitates the use of multiple methods to investigate and address environmental and social problems in context. Third, develop educational programs and applied experiences that provide students with the technical knowledge, powers of observation, critical thinking skills and management acumen required for them to become effective professionals and leaders. Organizing around these three principles would build unity in the EPM while at the same time capitalizing on the strengths of the many disciplines and diverse local conditions involved.

College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 1): integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world?

The environmental sciences/studies movement, with more than 1000 programs at colleges and universities in the United States and Canada, is unified by a common interest-ameliorating environmental problems through empirical enquiry and analytic judgment. Unfortunately, environmental programs have struggled in their efforts to integrate knowledge across disciplines and educate students to become sound problem solvers and leaders. We examine the environmental program movement as a policy problem, looking at overall goals, mapping trends in relation to those goals, identifying the underlying factors contributing to trends, and projecting the future. We argue that despite its shared common interest, the environmental program movement is disparate and fragmented by goal ambiguity, positivistic disciplinary approaches, and poorly rationalized curricula, pedagogies, and educational philosophies. We discuss these challenges and the nature of the changes that are needed in order to overcome them. In a subsequent article (Part 2) we propose specific strategies for improvement.