Impact on direct and indirect costs of switching patients with inflammatory bowel disease from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13).

BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the real-life direct and indirect costs of switching patients from intravenous to subcutaneous (SC) CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, in a tertiary UK Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) centre. METHODS: All adult patients with IBD on standard dosing CT-P13 (5 mg/kg 8 weekly) were eligible to switch. Of 169 patients eligible to switch to SC CT-P13, 98 (58%) switched within 3 months and one moved out of area. RESULTS: Total annual intravenous cost for 168 patients was £689 507.04 (direct=£653 671.20, indirect=£35 835.84). After the switch, as-treated analysis demonstrated total annual cost for 168 patients (70 intravenous and 98 SC) was £674 922.83 (direct = £654 563, indirect = £20 359.83) resulting in £891.80 higher cost to healthcare providers. Intention to treat analysis showed a total annual cost of £665 961.01 (direct = £655 200, indirect = £10 761.01) resulting in £1528.80 higher cost to healthcare providers. However, in each scenario, the significant decrease in indirect costs resulted in lower total costs after switching to SC CT-P13. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world analysis demonstrates switching from intravenous to SC CT-P13 is broadly cost neutral to healthcare providers. SC preparations have marginally higher direct costs, switching allows for efficient use of intravenous infusion units and reduces costs to patients.

A propensity score-matched, real-world comparison of ustekinumab vs vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn's disease. The Cross Pennine study II.

BACKGROUND: The optimal choice of biological agents after failure of anti-tumour-necrosis-factor-(TNF)α agent in Crohn's disease (CD) is yet to be defined. AIMS: To assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab compared to vedolizumab as second-line treatment in CD patients who failed anti-TNFα therapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical response and remission at 14 and 52 weeks to ustekinumab by physician global assessment (PGA). A propensity score-matched analysis with a cohort treated with vedolizumab was performed. RESULTS: Of 282 patients (mean age 40 ± 15, F:M ratio 1.7:1) treated with ustekinumab, clinical response or remission was reached by 200/282 patients (70.9%) at 14 weeks, and 162/259 patients (62.5%) at 52 weeks. Overall, 74 adverse events occurred, of which 26 were labelled as serious (8.3 per 100 person-year). After exclusion of patients without prior anti-TNFα exposure and patients previously exposed to vedolizumab or ustekinumab, we analysed 275/282 patients (97.5%) on ustekinumab and 118/135 patients (87.4%) on vedolizumab. Propensity score analysis revealed that at 14 weeks, patients treated with ustekinumab were 38% (95% CI 25%-50%; P < 0.001) more likely to achieve clinical remission, while at 52 weeks, the difference of 9% (95% CI -15% to 33%; P = 0.462) was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab was effective and well tolerated in this real-world cohort. While ustekinumab proved more effective at 14-weeks, we found no statistically significant differences at 52 weeks compared to vedolizumab.

Infliximab Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Virtual Biologics Clinic Leads to Durable Clinical Results.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab (IFX) trough levels and anti-drug antibodies in conjunction with symptoms, disease history, and investigations can aid decision-making. This study evaluated 1-year outcomes of patients with decisions that were altered on the basis of TDM results, in order to investigate whether outcomes from TDM-based decisions to adjust or stop IFX treatment are durable. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical outcomes 12 months post treatment decisions based on proactive TDM. Patients whose initial treatment decisions were altered on the basis of TDM results were compared with those where the decision remained unchanged. Events of interest were inpatient admissions with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), further changes to biologic therapy, and IBD-related health-care costs. RESULTS: Of 189 patients, 54 (28%) had initial treatment decisions altered in the light of TDM results. The 135 patients whose initial decision was not altered in light of TDM results served as the comparator. There were no differences in hospitalization rates or subsequent biologic switches between the altered decision groups and the comparator group. IBD-related health-care costs were higher in those whose initial decision was altered (median GBP 7,912 vs. GBP 6,521; p < 0.0001) due to higher drug costs (median GBP 7,062 vs. GBP 6,012; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates good outcomes from changes to IFX treatment based on TDM. Patients with a decision to stop, switch, or continue with an adjusted IFX dose experienced comparable clinical outcomes but had higher drug-related expenditure than those whose treatment decision was not altered in light of TDM.

Likely Exacerbation of Psychological Disorders from Covid-19 Response.

Anxiety and fear felt by people around the world regarding the coronavirus pandemic is real and can be overwhelming, resulting in strong emotional reactions in adults and children. With depressive and anxiety disorders already highly prevalent in the general population (300 million worldwide), depression and/or anxiety specifically because of the pandemic response is likely. Moreover, the current state of panic in the face of uncertainty is apt to produce significant amounts of stress. While this situation has the potential to cause psychological disorders in previously unaffected populations, perhaps more impactful is the exacerbation of symptoms of many existing disorders including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and hoarding disorder.

Efficacy and tolerability of initiating, or switching to, infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): a large single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, the infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13) received market authorisation for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), allowing cost benefits when switching to CT-P13. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of switching from originator infliximab to CT-P13 for new and existing patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Treatment response, remission, primary and secondary loss of response rates, and adverse events in patients who initiated infliximab originator in the 12 months pre-switch (n = 53) were compared with the patients who initiated CT-P13 in the 12 months post-switch (n = 69). Sustained responses were compared for existing infliximab originator patients who switched to CT-P13 (n = 191) and those who continued with the originator (n = 19). RESULTS: There was no difference in remission (58.1% vs. 47.4%, p = .37), response (12.6% vs. 10.5%, p = .80), secondary loss of response (24.6% vs. 42.1%, p = .10), or adverse events (4.7% vs. 0% p = 1.0) between those who switched to CT-P13 and those who continued infliximab originator. There was no difference in remission (42.0% vs. 26.4%, p = .074), response (21.7% vs. 22.6%, p = .91), primary non-response (5.8% vs. 15.1%, p = .09), secondary loss of response (21.7% vs. 22.6%, p = .91), or adverse events (8.7% vs. 11.3%, p = .63) in those who initiated CT-P13 compared with infliximab originator. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the efficacy and safety of infliximab originator and CT-P13 during the first 12 months after switching.

Infliximab Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Changes Clinical Decisions in a Virtual Biologics Clinic for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Virtual biologics clinics are often used to review patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving biological therapy, with decisions whether to continue, switch, or stop therapy made based on review of symptoms, disease history, and investigations. We aimed to investigate whether therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab (IFX) trough levels and anti-drug antibodies influences decision making within a virtual biologics clinic. METHODS: For all patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving IFX maintenance therapy, 2 decisions were recorded in a preset format. The first decision was based on assessment of clinical details, with clinicians blinded to IFX trough levels and anti-drug antibodies. The second decision was made after unblinding of these data. RESULTS: Among 191 patients (mean age 40 years; 106 (55.5%) male), IFX trough levels were sub-therapeutic in 53 (27.7%) (<2 mg/L), therapeutic in 100 (52.4%), and supra-therapeutic in 38 (19.9%) (>6 mg/L). Anti-drug antibodies were detected in 58 (30.4%), and were >50 AU/mL in 26 (13.6%). Blinded treatment decisions were changed on unblinding these data in 56 cases (29.3%; P < 0.0001). Knowledge of these data led to 7 (3.7%) patients receiving intensified IFX, whereas 33 (17.3%) patients were able to either dose de-escalate or stop IFX. CONCLUSIONS: Basing decisions on therapeutic drug monitoring, rather than clinical acumen alone, led to a change in almost one-third of decisions made, offering considerable cost savings and reducing exposure to potentially toxic therapies. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered an integral part of annual biologics assessment (see Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/IBD/B629).

Relationship of Body Mass Index to Clinical Outcomes after Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are conflicting data for the role of obesity in Crohn's disease (CD) and the effect on long-term clinical outcomes is poorly studied. Some evidence suggests obesity is associated with diminished responsiveness to biological agents, especially anti-tumour necrosis factor antibodies. METHODS: We aimed to examine the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the response to infliximab in CD in a retrospective analysis. The outcomes of interest within 12 months were: (1) Composite loss of response (CD-related flare or surgery; LOR); (2) any CD-related surgery (CDRS); and (3) CD-related intestinal resectional surgery (CDRIS). RESULTS: A total of 388 patients were included. The mean BMI was 24.2kg/m(2) [± standard deviation (SD) 5.1]. Of the 388 patients, 137 (35.4%) were overweight (BMI: 25-29.9kg/m(2)) or obese (BMI: ≥30kg/m(2))-160 (41.6%) patients had LOR during the 12 months follow-up; 121 (31.4%) required CDRS, and 109 (28.2%) required CDRIS. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing BMI (per unit, kg/m(2) increase) reduced the risk of LOR [odds ratio (OR): 0.98], CDRS (OR: 0.95), and CDRIS (OR: 0.95). Rates for all outcomes were higher, but not significantly so, in the extreme categories (underweight and obese) and lower in the underweight categories compared with normal BMI. Exclusion of the obese category of patients strengthened this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Body mass index at first infusion of infliximab has a non-linear relationship with outcomes at 12 months. The worst outcomes are at the extremes of weight (underweight and obese categories). Increasing BMI is associated with a modest reduction in risk of LOR, CDRS, and CDRIS within 12 months, increasing with the exclusion of the obese category.

Long-term efficacy and safety of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Azathioprine (AZA) is an established treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC).However, controversy exists regarding its efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical remission, and long-term data are lacking. We studied the effectiveness of AZA in a large cohort of UC patients treated in a single center. METHODS: All UC patients treated with AZA were identified from a prospective electronic database. We assessed response to therapy at 4 months and sustained clinical benefit at the last point of follow-up. We also examined predictors of response and sustained clinical benefit, as well as outcomes in those treated with AZA for >5 years. RESULTS: The study included 255 patients. At 4 months, 207 (81.2%) of 255 patients were still on AZA and 163 (63.9%) had responded to therapy. At the last point of follow-up 164 (64.3%) patients were still receiving AZA, of whom 154 (60.4%) achieved sustained clinical benefit. This effect was durable among 71 patients who received AZA for >5 years, with 61 (85.9%) considered to have achieved sustained clinical benefit. Twenty-six patients required admission to hospital for an exacerbation during AZA treatment, 20 patients ultimately required biologic therapy, and 21 underwent colectomy. Only two (2.8%) of 71 patients receiving AZA for >5 years needed to escalate to a biologic therapy, and only one (1.4%) required a colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: AZA is a safe and effective therapy in UC patients who fail 5-aminosalisylates in both the short and long term. Escalation to a biologic therapy or colectomy was unlikely among patients who were able to continue AZA therapy beyond 5 years.

Costs of adalimumab versus infliximab as first-line biological therapy for luminal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomised controlled trials demonstrate that the anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) therapies infliximab and adalimumab are effective in inducing remission and preventing relapse of Crohn's disease (CD). As few studies have compared costs and efficacy of these two drugs directly, we examined this issue. METHODS: Data were collected for patients receiving either drug as first-line anti-TNFα for CD. Patients were matched as closely as possible on age, gender, weight, height, and date of commencement of therapy. Response to induction therapy was assessed at 12weeks, and sustained clinical benefit at last point of follow-up. Resource data were collected for all patients until study end, with National Health Services reference costs applied to calculate the total cost per patient with adalimumab compared with infliximab. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had been treated with adalimumab as first-line anti-TNFα since 2010. We matched an identical number of infliximab patients. Demographic data were similar between the two groups. Costs were significantly lower with adalimumab (£6692.95 less per patient (95% confidence interval £1816.61-£11569.29)), which was largely driven by the drug costs and drug administration costs associated with infliximab. Twenty-nine (80.6%) patients responded to induction therapy with both drugs, and 22 (61.1%) achieved glucocorticosteroid-free sustained clinical benefit with either drug at last point of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Costs of infliximab used as first-line anti-TNFα therapy are greater, which may have implications for selection. Clinical outcomes appeared comparable, although power to detect a statistically significant difference would be limited.

A laboratory school comparison of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) and atomoxetine (Strattera) in school-aged children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Mixed amphetamine salts extended release (MAS XR; Adderall XR) and atomoxetine (Strattera) were compared in children 6 to 12 years old with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) combined or hyperactive/impulsive type in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, forced-dose-escalation laboratory school study. Primary efficacy measure was the SKAMP (Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham) behavioral rating scale. Changes in mean SKAMP deportment scores from baseline were significantly greater for MAS XR (n = 102) than for atomoxetine (n = 101) overall (-0.56 and -0.13, respectively; p < .0001) and at each week (p < .001). Adverse events were similar for both treatment groups. The extended time course of action and greater therapeutic efficacy of MAS XR suggests that it is more effective than atomoxetine in children with ADHD.