Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 98(3): 306-314, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36263597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism (PA) has been associated with decreased kidney function after surgery. It has been proposed that elimination of excess aldosterone unmasks an underlying failure of the kidney function. Contralateral suppression (CLS) is considered a marker of aldosterone excess and disease severity, and the purpose of this study was to assess the hypothesis that CLS would predict change in kidney function after adrenalectomy in patients with PA. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Patients with PA referred for adrenal venous sampling (AVS) between May 2011 and August 2021 and who were subsequently offered surgical or medical treatment were eligible for the current study. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were included and after AVS 85/138 (61.6%) underwent adrenalectomy while 53/138 (38.4%) were treated with MR-antagonists. In surgically treated patients the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was reduced by 11.5 (SD: 18.5) compared to a reduction of 5.9 (SD: 11.5) in medically treated patients (p = .04). Among surgically treated patients, 59/85 (69.4%) were classified as having CLS. After adrenalectomy, patients with CLS had a mean reduction in eGFR of 17.5 (SD: 17.6) compared to an increase of 1.8 (SD: 12.8) in patients without CLS (p < .001). The association between CLS and change in kidney function remained unchanged in multivariate analysis. Post-surgery, 16/59 (27.1%) patients with CLS developed hyperkalemia compared to 2/26 (7.7%) in patients without CLS (p = .04). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study found that CLS was a strong and independent predictor of a marked reduction of eGFR and an increased risk of hyperkalemia after adrenalectomy in patients with PA.


Subject(s)
Hyperaldosteronism , Hyperkalemia , Humans , Prognosis , Aldosterone , Hyperaldosteronism/surgery , Hyperkalemia/etiology , Hyperkalemia/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Adrenalectomy , Kidney/surgery , Adrenal Glands
2.
Acta Radiol Open ; 11(4): 20584601221094826, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35464294

ABSTRACT

In this case report, we outline a tailored approach for a complex patient with acute in chronic proximal occlusive mesenteric disease complicated with fresh thrombosis and a heavily calcified aorta, where the standard treatment proved suboptimal. We outline the surgical considerations that ultimately led to performing a hybrid procedure of open thrombectomy combined with retrograde open mesenteric stenting of the superior mesenteric artery. The patient was a 75-year-old male, with a history of severe arteriosclerosis presenting with abdominal pain over 48 h. An initial diagnostic laparoscopy was performed at a local hospital showing signs of mesenteric ischemia. The patient was transferred to a major trauma hospital, where the patient underwent an open thrombectomy combined with retrograde open mesenteric stenting. The patient's intestines showed no signs of necrosis after surgery, and the patient was discharged nine days after surgery. The patient has experienced no complications and was alive at the 90-day follow-up. This case report outlines the clinical information available to the surgeons, leading to their decision of an infrequently used approach in emergency surgery. We believe that hybrid procedures utilizing the strengths of both open and endovascular surgery should be considered in complex patients where standard treatment options are suboptimal. European guidelines state that retrograde open mesenteric stenting should be performed when antegrade stenting fails, utilizing a through-and-through procedure. We believe that in some cases it is beneficial to the patient to use a hybrid approach including retrograde open mesenteric stenting as first line treatment.

3.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 96(6): 793-802, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060161

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of endocrine hypertension and adrenalectomy is the firstline treatment for unilateral PA. Suppression of aldosterone secretion of the nondominant adrenal gland at adrenal venous sampling (AVS), that is, contralateral suppression (CLS) has been suggested as a marker of disease severity. However, whether factors such as CLS, age, gender or comorbidities are associated with remission after surgery is controversial. The objective of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of CLS, age, gender, aldosterone-to-renin ratio, antihypertensives and comorbidities for clinical and biochemical remission following unilateral adrenalectomy in patients with PA. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A retrospective study of patients with PA referred for AVS at Rigshospitalet from May 2011 to September 2020, who subsequently underwent adrenalectomy. Clinical remission was defined according to the PA surgical outcome criteria, whereas complete biochemical remission was defined as normalization of hypokalaemia without potassium substitution. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were available for analysis of primary outcome. Among patients with CLS, 28/58 (48.3%) obtained complete clinical remission after surgery compared with 10/26 (38.5%) without CLS (p = .40). Complete biochemical remission was obtained in 55/58 (94.8%) of patients with CLS compared with 25/28 (89.3%) without CLS (p = .44). Female gender and lower number of antihypertensives at baseline were associated with higher odds for complete clinical remission, whereas none of the investigated variables were associated with biochemical remission. CONCLUSION: CLS was not significantly associated with complete clinical or biochemical remission in this cohort. Our results confirmed that female gender and lower number of antihypertensives were predictors of clinical remission.


Subject(s)
Hyperaldosteronism , Adrenal Glands , Adrenalectomy/methods , Aldosterone , Antihypertensive Agents , Female , Humans , Hyperaldosteronism/drug therapy , Hyperaldosteronism/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
4.
Horm Res Paediatr ; 93(4): 226-238, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33017824

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is an autosomal recessive disease predominantly caused by 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Clinical management in children includes glucocorticoid and often mineralocorticoid treatment alongside monitoring outcomes such as an-thro-po-metry, pubertal status, blood pressure, and biochemistry. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this pilot study was to present the use of 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) and androgen metabolites expressed as standard deviation (SD) scores rather than actual concentrations as a tool in the management of children with CAH as well as in research settings. METHODS: The study was a retrospective, longitudinal study that took place in a single, tertiary center and included 38 children and adolescents aged 3-18 years with CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Biochemical measurements of 17-OHP, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEAS), and testosterone using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry were expressed as SD scores, and outcomes such as genotype, height, bone maturation, blood pressure, and treatment doses were extracted from patient files. RESULTS: The majority (86%) of CAH patients had 17-OHP measurements above +2 SD during standard hydrocortisone therapy, receiving an average daily hydrocortisone dose of 12.6 mg/m2. Androstenedione concentrations were mostly within ±2 SD, whereas DHEAS values were below -2 SD in 47% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Applying sex- and age-related SD scores to 17-OHP and androgen metabolite concentrations allows for monitoring of hydrocortisone treatment independent of age, sex, assay, and center. We propose that 17-OHP and androgen metabolites expressed as SD scores be implemented as a unifying tool that simplifies research and, in the future, also optimal management of treatment.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital , Androstenedione/blood , Hydrocortisone/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital/blood , Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital/drug therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies
5.
Dan Med J ; 64(7)2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28673383

ABSTRACT

An increasing number of patients develop symptomatic spinal metastasis and increasing evidence supports the benefit of surgical decompression and spinal stabilization combined with radiation therapy. However, surgery for metastatic spinal disease is known to be associated with a risk of substantial intraoperative blood loss and perioperative allogenic blood transfusion. Anemia is known to increase morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery, but studies also indicate that transfusion with allogenic red blood cells (RBC) may lead to worse outcomes. To reduce intraoperative bleeding preoperative embolization has been used in selected cases suspected for hypervascular spinal metastases, but no randomized trial has examined the effect. The final decision on whether preoperative embolization should be performed is based on the preoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) tumor blush, and as such considered the "gold standard" for determining the vascularity of spinal metastases. Reliability studies evaluating vascularity ratings of DSA tumor blush have not been published before. This PhD thesis is based on three studies with the following aims: I. To assess whether perioperative allogenic blood transfusions in patients undergoing surgical treatment for spinal metastases independently influence patient survival (Study 1). II. To assess whether preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization of spinal metastases reduces blood loss, the need for transfusion with allogenic RBC and surgery time in the surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression (Study 2). III. To describe the vascularity of metastasis causing spinal cord compression (Study 2). IV. To evaluate inter- and intra-observer agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using DSA tumor blush (Study 3). In conclusion the findings of this thesis demonstrate that preoperative embolization in patients with symptomatic spinal metastasis independent of primary tumor diagnosis does not reduce intraoperative blood loss and the need for allogenic RBC transfusion significantly, but does reduce the surgery time. However, a small reduction of intraoperative blood loss was observed in the hypervascular metastases. This tendency could be underestimated because of the study design and furthermore the tendency may be enhanced in metastases of only the most pronounced hypervascularity. The findings furthermore support that perioperative blood transfusion of less than 5 units does not decrease survival in patients operated for spinal metastases and transfusion of 1-2 units seems to be weakly associated with increased 12-month survival. It was demonstrated that approximately 75 percent of spinal metastases are hypervascular in a consecutive series of patients with symptoms of metastatic medullary compression and spinal instability operated by decompression and instrumented spinal stabilization. In addition the findings show that there is satisfactory moderate inter- and intrarater agreement in classifying the vascularity of spinal metastases on a three-step ordinal scale for DSA tumor blush. Nevertheless, there is a call for an accurate preoperative way to evaluate the vascularity of spinal metastases in order to select patients most likely to benefit from preoperative embolization.


Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Spinal Cord Compression/therapy , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Angiography , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Humans , Observer Variation , Operative Time , Preoperative Care/methods , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Acta Radiol ; 58(6): 734-739, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27650032

ABSTRACT

Background Preoperative embolization is based on the preoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) tumor blush, and as such is considered the "gold standard" for determining tumor vascularity. However, to our knowledge reliability studies evaluating vascularity ratings of DSA tumor blush in spinal metastases have not been published previously. Purpose To evaluate inter- and intra-rater agreement in the assessment of the vascularity of spinal metastases using DSA tumor blush. Material and Methods This reliability study included 46 patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression requiring surgery. DSA data stored in the hospital picture archiving and communication system (PACS) from the participants of a randomized controlled trial were used. Inter- and intra-rater agreement on vascularity assessment using DSA tumor blush according to a three-step ordinal scale was evaluated: no hypervascularity; moderate hypervascularity; and pronounced hypervascularity. The statistical analysis was based on the linear weighted kappa's for multiple raters that extend Cohen's κ. Three raters and κ = 0.2 in the null hypothesis implied that the power of the study was 0.96. Results Inter- and intra-rater agreements were moderate in rating the vascularity of spinal metastases and the agreements were significantly higher than the κ = 0.20 in the null hypothesis ( P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0001). The κ value for inter-rater agreement was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.72) and for intra-rater agreement 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38-0.71). Conclusion There is moderate inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in classifying the vascularity of spinal metastases on a three-step ordinal scale for DSA tumor blush.


Subject(s)
Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Spinal Neoplasms/blood supply , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary
7.
J Emerg Trauma Shock ; 9(3): 107-14, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27512332

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Exsanguination due to coagulopathy and vascular injury is a common cause of death among trauma patients. Arterial injury can be treated either by angiography and embolization or by explorative laparotomy and surgical packing. The purpose of this study was to compare 30-day mortality and blood product consumption in trauma patients with active arterial haemorrhage in the abdominal and/or pelvic region treated with either angiography and embolization or explorative laparotomy and surgical packing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 1(st) 2006 to December 31(st) 2011 2,173 patients with an ISS of >9 were admitted to the Trauma Centre of Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Of these, 66 patients met the inclusion criteria: age above 15 years and active arterial haemorrhage from the abdominal and/or pelvic region verified by a CT scan at admission. Gender, age, initial oxygen saturation, pulse rate and respiratory rate, mechanism of injury, ISS, Probability of Survival, treatment modality, 30-day mortality and number and type of blood products applied were retrieved from the TARN database, patient records and the Danish Civil Registration System. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received angiography and embolization, and 35 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy and surgical packing. Gender, age, initial oxygen saturation, pulse rate and respiratory rate, ISS and Probability of Survival were comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: A significant increased risk of 30-day mortality (P = 0.04) was found in patients with active bleeding treated with explorative laparotomy and surgical packing compared to angiography and embolization when data was adjusted for age and ISS. No statistical significant difference (P > 0.05) was found in number of transfused blood products applied in the two groups of patients.

8.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 158: 252-7, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994334

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Light in the blue spectrum is well known to cure composites. This in vitro-study was aimed to analyze a potential antimicrobial activity when combined with riboflavin as a photosensitizer. METHODS: Photoactivated disinfection (PAD) using a LED lamp emitting in the blue spectrum for 30s (PAD30) and 60s (PAD60) after application of 0.1% riboflavin was compared with a LED lamp emitting in the red spectrum with the respective photosensitizer (PADred). Killing activity was analyzed against planktonic 14 single species and a 12-species mixture with and without 25% serum. In addition, there was a reduction of viable bacterial counts in single species and a 12-species biofilm was measured after PAD. RESULTS: Gram-positive bacteria were less sensitive to PAD30 and PAD60 than Gram-negatives. PAD60 decreased the counts by more than 3log10cfu in two of five Gram-positive and in six of nine Gram-negative strains, the total viable counts of the mixture were reduced by 1.04±0.46log10cfu. In the presence of 25% serum a decrease by more than 2log10cfu was only found in tests with one Porphyromonas gingivalis strain. PADred killed all included strains except for the 12-species mixture and Eubacterium nodatum. PAD60 reduced the counts in P. gingivalis biofilms by 2-3log10cfu, however there was no activity of PAD60 and PADred on the multi-species biofilm. CONCLUSIONS: PAD using LED emitting in the blue spectrum combined with riboflavin is active against periodontopathogenic microbial species but clearly inferior to PADred. Multi-species biofilms are not sensitive to PAD using LED.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Light , Biofilms
9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 26(3): 402-12.e1, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25636672

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess whether preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization of spinal metastases reduces blood loss, the need for transfusion with allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs), and surgery time in the surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-blind, randomized (1:1), controlled, parallel-group, single-center trial was approved by the Danish National Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics and was conducted from May 2011-March 2013. Participants (N = 45) were scheduled for decompression and posterior thoracic/lumbar spinal instrumentation and randomly assigned to either preoperative embolization (n = 23) or a control group (n = 22). The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes were perioperative blood loss, allogeneic RBC transfusion, and surgery time. Analyses were performed by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis included 45 patients. Mean intraoperative blood loss did not differ significantly (P = .270) between the embolization group (618 mL [SD, 282 mL]) and the control group (735 mL [SD, 415 mL]). There was also no significant difference in allogeneic RBC transfusion (P = .243). Surgery time was significantly shorter in the embolization group (P = .031): median 90 minutes (range, 54-252 min) versus 124 minutes (range, 80-183 min). The subanalysis of hypervascular metastases revealed a significant (P = .041) reduction in blood loss in the embolization group: 645 mL (SD, 289 mL) versus 902 mL (SD, 416 mL). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative embolization in patients with symptomatic spinal metastasis independent of primary tumor diagnosis did not reduce intraoperative blood loss and allogeneic RBC transfusion significantly but did reduce the surgery time. A small reduction of intraoperative blood loss was shown in hypervascular metastases.


Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Laminectomy/methods , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Spinal Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Laminectomy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Postoperative Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Preoperative Care/methods , Single-Blind Method , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Treatment Outcome
10.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 93(10): 1034-41, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25138733

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between mode of delivery and subsequent reproductive outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort study. POPULATION: Women with term singleton live births from 1987 to 2009. SETTING: Denmark, birth registration data. METHODS: Women with a first singleton delivery after 37 weeks were followed until the end of 2010, from a first birth to include subsequent live births. We used Cox's proportional hazards model stratified by parity to compare the likelihood for subsequent delivery according to mode of delivery at first and later births, estimating maternal age effects and lag time to next delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Likelihood of a subsequent live-born child by previous delivery mode. RESULTS: We identified 642,052 women with a first delivery. Compared with women with a non-instrumental vaginal delivery, delivering a child by elective cesarean section implied a 23% (95% CI 0.76-0.787) decreased likelihood for subsequent delivery. Emergency cesarean section meant 16% fewer (95% CI 0.84-0.85), and vaginal instrumental delivery 4% fewer subsequent deliveries (95% CI 0.95-0.96). Hazard ratios were largely unchanged after controlling for parity and year of birth. Small age-trends were seen, with hazard ratios affected by maternal age at birth. Delivery mode at first birth affected marginally the time lag until next birth. CONCLUSIONS: Fecundity, measured as likelihood of a successive live-born child, varied with mode of delivery at the first and also subsequent births. A first or later delivery by cesarean section implied decreased likelihood of subsequent delivery compared with women with a first vaginal birth.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric , Natural Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Birth Certificates , Cohort Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Denmark/epidemiology , Emergencies/epidemiology , Female , Fertility , Humans , Maternal Age , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Proportional Hazards Models , Reproductive History
11.
Eur Spine J ; 23(8): 1791-6, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24866254

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess whether perioperative allogenic blood transfusions in patients undergoing surgical treatment for spinal metastases independently influence patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective study including 170 consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for spinal metastases in 2009 and 2010 at a tertiary referral center. Variables related to postoperative survival were all included in the same multivariable logistic regression analysis with either 3- or 12-month survival as the dependent variable. The independent variables were: transfusion of allogenic red blood cells, age at surgery, gender, preoperative hemoglobin, revised Tokuhashi score and no. of instrumented levels. RESULTS: Perioperative allogenic blood transfusion of 1-2 units was associated with increased 12-month survival [p = 0.049, odds ratio 2.619 (confidence interval 1.004-6.831)], but not with 3-month survival. Larger transfusion volumes did not significantly influence survival. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study support that perioperative blood transfusion of <5 units does not decrease survival in patients operated for spinal metastases. Transfusion of 1-2 units seems to be associated with increased 12-month survival. Future studies should assess if a liberal transfusion regime can be applied to this group of patients; thereby, prioritizing early postoperative mobilization.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/mortality , Preoperative Care/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Blood Transfusion/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Preoperative Care/trends , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Survival Rate/trends , Treatment Outcome
12.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 93(2): 138-43, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24266548

ABSTRACT

Publications on abnormally invasive placenta in general report what can be considered a mixture of the conditions true accreta, increta and percreta varieties. The aim of this review was to identify all published cases of the most severe condition, placenta percreta in order to describe complications associated with the three commonly used surgical strategies: local resection, hysterectomy or leaving the placenta in situ, and to describe the outcome, with respect to blood loss and transfusion requirements, with the different endovascular interventions that may be used as adjuncts in the management of the conditions. A PubMed search was performed in April 2013 and the final review included 119 published placenta percreta cases. Conservative management, where the placenta is left in situ for resorption, seems to be associated with severe long-term complications of hemorrhage and infections, including a 58% risk that a hysterectomy will eventually be needed up till nine months after the delivery. Local resection seems to be associated with fewer complications within 24 h postoperatively compared with hysterectomy or leaving the placenta in situ. A selection bias in the direction of less severe cases for the local resection technique might in part explain the lower complication rates with that approach. Future prospective data collection activities should include intended as well as actual management, and long-term follow-up of all cases is of vital importance.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Hysterectomy/statistics & numerical data , Placenta Accreta/therapy , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Uterine Artery Embolization/statistics & numerical data , Blood Volume , Cesarean Section/methods , Female , Humans , Placenta Accreta/pathology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/pathology , Treatment Outcome
13.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 92(4): 386-91, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22574880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate our experience with prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries as a part of a multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of placenta percreta. DESIGN: Consecutive case series. Setting. Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark. Sample. Seventeen women with placenta percreta. METHODS: Demographic characteristics, intraoperative data and outcomes are summarized and discussed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility of local resection, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: The multidisciplinary management allowed for local resections in nine of the 11 women who requested preservation of fertility. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 4050 mL (range 450-16 000 mL, median 2500 mL). Adhesions to the bladder or the parietal peritoneum were associated with an intraoperative blood loss >6000 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries as part of a multidisciplinary algorithm allowed for a safe management of all cases in our consecutive series of 17 women with placenta percreta. However, intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were significant. We have therefore decided to modify our multidisciplinary algorithm to include balloon occlusion of the common iliac arteries rather than the internal iliac arteries.


Subject(s)
Balloon Occlusion/methods , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Iliac Artery , Interdisciplinary Communication , Placenta Accreta/surgery , Adult , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Cesarean Section/methods , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Hemostasis, Surgical/methods , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology
14.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 173(33): 1952-5, 2011 Aug 15.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21849134

ABSTRACT

Placenta percreta is a rare life-threatening obstetrical condition, often resulting in severe haemorrhage and hysterectomy. The incidence seems to be increasing, probably secondary to the increase in caesarean section rates. We present a protocol for an elective multidisciplinary approach with proactive management to reduce haemorrhage and allow appropriate surgery, which imply a low maternal and fetal morbidity as well as maintained fertility.


Subject(s)
Perioperative Care/methods , Placenta Previa/surgery , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/methods , Critical Pathways , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Care Team , Placenta Previa/diagnostic imaging , Placenta Previa/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...