[Real world data in radiotherapy: A data farming project by Unitrad]. / Données de vie réelle en radiothérapie : le data farming du groupe Unitrad.

The aim of the data farming project by the Unitrad group is to produce and use large quantities of structured real-life data throughout radiotherapy treatment. Starting in 2016, target real world data were selected at expert consensus conferences and regularly updated, then captured in MOSAIQ© as the patient was treated. For each partner institution, the data was then stored in a relational database, then extracted and used by researchers to create real world knowledge. This production was carried out in a multicentre, coordinated fashion. When necessary, the raw data was shared according to the research projects, in compliance with regulations. Feedack was provided at each stage, enabling the system to evolve flexibly and rapidly, using the "agile" method. This work, which is constantly evolving, has led to the creation of health data warehouses focused on data of interest in radiotherapy, and the publication of numerous academic studies. It forms part of the wider context of the exploitation of real-life data in cancerology. Unitrad data farming is a collaborative project for creating knowledge from real-life radiotherapy data, based on an active network of clinicians and researchers.

[Prognostic factors of acute radiodermatitis in breast cancer after adjuvant radiotherapy treated with RT3D or IMRT]. / Étude des facteurs pronostiques de radiodermite aiguë dans le cancer du sein traité par irradiation conformationnelle adjuvante avec ou sans modulation d'intensité.

PURPOSE: Real life study of prognostic factors of acute radiodermatitis in a monocentric cohort of 200 patients with breast cancer treated with RT3D or IMRT for adjuvant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study comprises 200 patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, included consecutively. For each patient, their clinical and tumoral characteristics and the irradiation schedule was retrospectively collected. The severity of acute radiodermatitis was also collected, during the treatment and 6weeks after the end of irradiation. The objective was to identify risk factors for acute radiodermatitis grade≥2. RESULTS: The univariate analysis found that a more important BMI (p<0.001), a more important volume of PTV (p<0.001) a normofractionated schedule (p=0.002) were statistically associated to a greater risk of occurrence of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis. The multivariate analysis found BMI>30 (OR=9.31, p=0.04), light phototype (OR=0.04, p=0.02) and histology other than invasive breast carcinomas (OR=0.07, p=0.04) to be statistically associated to the occurrence of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis. CONCLUSION: In this monocentric retrospective study, with a prospective collection of the severity of acute radiodermatitis, no grade 3 radiodermatitis has been observed and the frequency of occurrence of grade 2 radiodermatitis was lower than previously published. In contrast to previously published results, IMRT was not associated to a lower risk of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis. Multivariate analysis found BMI, phototype, and histology to be risk factors of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis.

[New concepts of medical consultation in oncology]. / Nouveaux concepts de consultations médicales en oncologie.

New concepts of medical consultations are currently disrupting the practice of medicine. The use of standardized questionnaires, or patient-reported outcome (PRO and ePRO) has already significantly changed the relationship between the physician and the patient. Telemedicine, or even automatic conversational agents, such as chatbots, are also providing more convenient access to care and medical information for many patients. These tools have a major impact in oncology, precisely because of the rising chronicity of the diseases the radiation oncologists treat. In this article, we provide a detailed analysis of these new concepts.

[Radiotherapy of bone metastases in France: A descriptive monocentric retrospective study]. / Radiothérapie des métastases osseuses en France : étude descriptive rétrospective monocentrique.

PURPOSE: Bone metastases cause pain and affect patients' quality of life. Radiation therapy is one of the reference analgesic treatments. The objective of this study was to compare the current practices of a French radiotherapy department for the treatment of uncomplicated bone metastases with data from the literature in order to improve and optimize the management of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective monocentric study of patients who underwent palliative irradiation of uncomplicated bone metastases was performed. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients had 116 treatments of uncomplicated bone metastases between January 2014 and December 2015, including 44 men (48%) and 47 women (52%) with an average age of 63years (25-88years). Primary tumours most commonly found were breast cancer (35%), lung cancer (16%) and prostate cancer (12%). The regimens used were in 29% of cases 30Gy in ten fractions (group 30Gy), in 21% of cases 20Gy in five fractions (group 20Gy), in 22% of cases 8Gy in one fraction (group 8Gy) and in 28% of cases 23.31Gy in three fractions of stereotactic body irradiation (stereotactic group). The general condition of the patient (P<0.001), pain score and analgesic (P<0.001), oligometastatic profile (P=0.003) and practitioner experience (P<0.001) were factors influencing the choice of the regimen irradiation. Age (P=0.46), sex (P=0.14), anticancer treatments (P=0.56), concomitant hospitalization (P=0.14) and the distance between the radiotherapy centre and home (P=0.87) did not influence the decision significantly. A total of three cases of spinal compression and one case of post-therapeutic fracture were observed, occurring between one and 128days and 577days after irradiation, respectively. Eight percent of all irradiated metastases were reirradiated with a delay ranging between 13 and 434days after the first irradiation. The re-irradiation rate was significantly higher after 8Gy (P=0.02). The rate of death was significantly lower in the stereotactic arm (P<0.001) and overall survival was significantly greater in the stereotactic arm (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients' analysed was comparable to the population of different studies. Predictive factors for the choice of the treatment regimen were identified. Non-fractionnated therapy was underutilised while stereotactic treatment was increasingly prescribed, showing an evolution in the management of patients.

[Spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy: French assessment in 2016]. / État des lieux de la radiothérapie en conditions stéréotaxiques vertébrale en France en 2016.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy to vertebral column remains uncommon practice and only relevant in selected group of patients. The main objective of the study was to describe the current state of medical practices of stereotactic body radiotherapy to vertebral column in France in 2016 and to assess the diversity of practices to identify areas for improvement and establish a common database set for this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was written with contribution of a medical physicist, a radiation oncologist, an information technologist and a radiotherapy resident. The questionnaire was distributed online to a radiation oncologists and a medical physicists partner of selected French radiotherapy specialized centres that provide stereotactic body radiotherapy to vertebral metastasis from April to June 2016. The questionnaire surveyed the following topics: patients' selection, simulation, targeted volume and organs at risk delineation, prescription, dosimetric implementation and image guidance. RESULTS: A total of 31 centres were surveyed. Seventy eight per cent of centres (n=21) completed the questionnaire. The "ideal" patient for spine stereotactic radiotherapy according to these institutions has a good performance status, a long life expectancy, controlled primary tumour with oligometastatic spread. The most prescribed protocol was 30Gy in three fractions. For clinical target volume delineation, about two thirds of centres used the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC) recommendations (Noël G et al.,2006). CONCLUSION: This study identified some consistency of practices in some aspects despite the lack of consensus guidelines. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to establish consensus of planning and treatment.

[Risk of radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases]. / Risque de radionécrose après radiothérapie hypofractionnée en conditions stéréotaxiques du lit opératoire de métastases cérébrales.

PURPOSE: To investigate the factors that potentially lead to brain radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis conducted in two French centres, was performed in patients treated with trifractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (3×7.7Gy prescribed to the 70% isodose line) for resected brain metastases. Patients with previous whole-brain irradiation were excluded of the analysis. Radionecrosis was diagnosed according to a combination of criteria including clinical, serial imaging or, in some cases, histology. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of radionecrosis including clinical and dosimetric variables such as volume of brain receiving a specific dose (V8Gy-V22Gy). RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients, with a total of 189 cavities were treated between March 2008 and February 2015. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow-up of 15 months (range: 3-38 months) after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. One third of patients with radionecrosis were symptomatic. Multivariate analysis showed that infra-tentorial location was predictive of radionecrosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.47-6.01; P=0.0025). None V8Gy-V22Gy was associated with appearance of radionecrosis, even if V14Gy trended toward significance (P=0.059). CONCLUSION: Analysis of patients and treatment variables revealed that infratentorial location of brain metastases was predictive for radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for postoperative resection cavities.

[Frameless set-up with ExacTrac® system for stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastasis: Descriptive study from five French centres]. / Repositionnement par le système ExacTrac® pour l'irradiation sans cadre invasif de métastases cérébrales en conditions stéréotaxiques : étude descriptive de cinq centres français.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyse the positioning protocols with the ExacTrac® system, associated with a dedicated linear accelerator such as Novalis®, for stereotactic treatment of brain metastases in several French centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey, including three questions about the prescription of irradiation and twenty-one questions about how the ExacTrac® system is used, was sent to nine French centres owning a dedicated Novalis® accelerator. Five centres have accepted to participate in the study. RESULTS: All centres checked the positioning before each treatment's bow, with residual mismatch tolerances of 0.5 to 0.7mm for the translations and 0.5 to 1° for the rotations. All centres except one also realised orthogonal planar images of classic incidences to help operators ensure proper isocentre positioning. Prescribed doses were 20Gy in one fraction, 30Gy and 33Gy in three fractions or 34Gy in four fractions, mainly depending on the size of the lesion. Finally, a physician validated the images at the treatment station before starting the irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: The practices of the different centres concerning the positioning protocols were rather homogeneous, in agreement with the literature data on ExacTrac® system's accuracy, as well as proposed fractionations. The systematic medical validation at the treatment station may, however, be questioned because of the waiting time between the doctor's call and validation itself and because of its usefulness; indeed, corrections by the radiation oncologist are very rare and in some centres, non-existent.

Patterns of relapse in patients with high grade glioma receiving combined treatments including stereotactic re-irradiation for a first relapse.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab and stereotactic treatment are efficient combined or alone in relapse glioma. However, patterns of relapse after this kind of salvage treatment have never been studied. The purpose of this unicentric retrospective analysis was to assess and understand the patterns of relapse of high grade glioma treated with stereotactic radiation, with or without bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with high grade glioma relapse received a stereotactic radiation; among them two patients received temozolomide and eight patients received bevacizumab; among the latter, four received also irinotecan. We matched the stereotactic radiation treatment planning scan with the images of the first treatment and of the second relapse in order to determine the patterns of failure and associate dosimetric profile. RESULTS: For the total population, median follow-up from the first diagnosis and relapse were 46.1 and 17.6 months, respectively. Among the 13 patients who relapsed, ten did not receive chemotherapy and three received it (P<0.05), two received temozolomide and one bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab had no "out-of-field" recurrences. Among the 32 irradiated relapses, 15 were "in-field" recurrences; among them two were treated with bevacizumab and 13 were not (P<0.05). For the 32 lesions, a favourable prognostic factor of control was the association of a high-dose of irradiation and the use of bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: For patients with relapsed high grade glioma, local control was higher with combined bevacizumab and high-dose stereotactic radiation.

An unusual pituitary stalk lesion: What is the place of surgery?

BACKGROUND: Sellar and suprasellar primary melanocytic tumors are exceptional occurrences. Besides the difficulty of differential diagnosis between a primary and secondary lesion, treatment of these pathologies is still unclear and controversial. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 36-year-old woman with no relevant previous medical history who presented with 1 month history of diabetes insipidus, blurred vision and generalized weakness; a brain MRI disclosed an atypical pituitary stalk lesion; initially the tumor was biopsied through an endonasal endoscopic approach that revealed a melanocytic tumor; the patient was afterwards managed by a second stage extended endonasal endoscopic approach achieving a subtotal tumor removal. The overall survival was of 14 months due to the multidisciplinary management including surgery, radio and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: If a biopsy is essential to deal with these invasive lesions, treatment including surgical resection should be part of a multidisciplinary approach.

[Radio-induced breast morphoea: an unrecognized complication]. / Morphée du sein radio-induite : une complication méconnue.

Morphoea is a localized scleroderma. Since the 1990s, it is described as a complication after irradiation for breast cancer. This complication is unrecognized and underdiagnosed. Irradiation seems to be a factor inducing an autoimmune process. Clinicians should be aware in case of an erythema in a treated area, appearing on average one year after the end of the irradiation. Histology alone can prove the diagnosis and rule out differential diagnoses: principally mastitis (carcinomatous, infectious), chronic radiodermatitis or radiation recall. Treatment of this rare complication is not consensual; it is most often topical steroids. The evolution is marked by a gradual decrease from the initial inflammation. Sclerosis persists, more or less substantially.

Baseline nutritional status is prognostic factor after definitive radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Identify prognostic factors for survival and patterns of treatment failure after definitive radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. Between 2003 and 2006, 143 patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were retrospectively reviewed. Median age was 65 years (42-81). Median radiation dose was 62.5 Gy (38-72) with 1.8-2 Gy fraction. Median follow-up was 20.8 months (2.8-92.4). Three and 5-year local recurrence-free survival rates were 58.3% and 50.9%. In univariate analysis, traversable esophageal stricture was a prognostic factor. Three, 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 42.4% and 34.9%. In multivariate analysis, traversable esophageal stricture and stage < IIB were independent prognostic factors. Three and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 30.5% and 25.9%. In multivariate analysis, Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) ≥ 97.5 and performance status (PS) = 0 were independent prognostic factors. Median, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were 22.1 months, 34.4%, and 19.8%. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors were NRI ≥ 97.5 and PS = 0. Median survival times for the NRI classes (no denutrition, moderate and severe denutrition) were 29.5, 19.7, and 12 months (P = 0.0004), respectively. A major impact of baseline NRI was found in terms of survival; it should be included in future prospective trials.

[An analysis of 20 consecutive patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy on Novalis Tx(®) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer]. / Analyse des résultats d'une série de 20 patients traités par irradiation hypofractionnée en conditions stéréotaxiques par Novalis Tx(®) pour un cancer bronchopulmonaire non à petites cellules de stade I.

PURPOSE: Recent clinical results of dose escalation with stereotactic body radiation therapy to increase local tumour control for patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer who either refuse surgery or are medically inoperable resulted in making it a standard treatment in this setting. This treatment technique was implemented at the Paul-Strauss Centre, Strasbourg, in 2010. The objective of this study is to describe and analyze the data of the first 20 treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2010 to May 2012, 20 patients were treated with this technique for T1N0M0 or T2N0M0 lung tumour. The indication was proposed by the multidisciplinary thoracic oncology team meeting, and approved by the technical committee of the Department of Radiotherapy. After the realization of a dosimetric CT Scan (4DCT or three phases-free breathing and deep breath-hold inspiration and expiration) and after performing a ((18)F)-FDG PET scan in the treatment position, all patients were treated on Novalis Tx(®) linear accelerator, with arctherapy or modulated intensity radiotherapy (IMRT). A protocol has been defined for the prescribed dose, depending on the size and location of the tumor, central or peripheral. The patients underwent follow-up during treatment and at 1 month, 3-4 months, 6 and 9 months to assess outcomes and toxicities. RESULTS: The mean age was 72.6 years (52-89). Seventeen patients had one or more pulmonary comorbidities. The mean delivered dose was 59.9 Gy (40-70) in 4 Gy to 17.5 Gy fractions. The mean gross tumour volume was 14.9 mL (median 7.2, 0.9 to 73.5) and the mean planning target volume was 77.8 mL (median 49.5; 17-300). The mean initial SUV max was 7.7 (1.8 to 16.7). Dose constraints and planning target volume coverage recommended by the protocol were achieved in the majority of cases. The mean lung V20 was 7.63% (1.2 to 17.7) and the mean dose delivered to the planning target volume was 94.6% (88-99). The duration of treatment was 21 days (median: 23; 8-27), and no change or interruption of prescribed treatment has occurred. Median follow-up was 6.6 months, and crude rates of objective response for patients evaluated were 85% (11/13 patients) at 3 months and 100% at 6 and 9 months. The complete response rate at 3 and 6 months were 0 (0/13 patients) and 50% (5/10 patients). Two patients had metastatic disease in the 6 months following treatment. Concerning pulmonary toxicity at 3 months, 6 patients developed G2 radiation pneumonitis and three patients G3, with positive evolution. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the results of this series, comparable with those described in literature, shows that lung stereotactic radiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for inoperable patients. The extension of the indications could be envisaged based on the results of ongoing trials.

[Definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: 66Gy versus 50Gy, a retrospective study]. / Chimioradiothérapie exclusive pour cancer de l'œsophage : comparaison entre 66Gy et 50Gy, une étude rétrospective.

PURPOSE: To compare the influence of radiation dose, high dose versus standard dose, on survival for patients with esophageal carcinomas treated with definitive radiochemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, 143 consecutive patients with squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, clinical stage I to IVA, treated in two different institutions were retrospectively reviewed, 83 patients had received more than 50.4Gy, median dose 66Gy (50.7-72Gy) and 60 less than or equal to 50.4Gy, median dose 50Gy (38-50.4Gy). RESULTS: Median age was higher in high dose group (67.6 versus 61.7 years). Nutritional status and stage were better in high dose group with a lower weight loss (5.1 versus 7.9%), a higher body mass index (25.7 versus 22.9), more N0 patients (60.2 versus 31.7%) and less stage III (27.7 versus 63.3%). Median follow up was 20.8 months (2.8-92.4 months), and 64.9 months (4.2-92.4 months) for the 33 surviving patients. No statistically significant difference was shown for local/locoregional control, disease-free survival. Overall survival at 2-, 3- and 5-year and median survival was respectively 44.7%, 36.8%, 19.1% and 21.2 months in high dose group and 50.8%, 31.6%, 20.7% and 24.6 months in standard dose group (P=0.9). CONCLUSION: No difference was found between the two groups in terms of local/distant control and overall survival. A prospective randomised study is needed.

[Stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial benign tumors]. / Radiothérapie en conditions stéréotaxiques des tumeurs bénignes intracrâniennes.

Stereotactic radiotherapy can be delivered in one fraction or in multiple fractions schedule. It is used in benign tumours such as meningiomas, mainly localized in the base of the skull, for acoustic schwannoma and pituitary tumours. Whatever the tumour, results with the Gamma Knife(®) are the most numerous, but those obtained by linear accelerators, adapted or dedicated, are comparable. The peripheral dose is preferred to the dose delivered to the isocentre. One fraction stereotactic irradiation should be proposed in small lesions and fractionated treatment for tumours larger. Whatever the tumour, the results are satisfactory with a control rate of 90%. However, this value reflects a disparity assessment, radiological stability for meningiomas, radiological stability and preservation of useful hearing in schwannoma and radiological stability and a decrease in hormonal secretions for pituitary adenomas. Overall complication rates are low. In total, the treatment of benign lesions with stereotactic irradiation gives satisfactory results with few complications.

[Systematic review of stereotactic radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas]. / Radiothérapie en conditions stéréotaxiques des gliomes de haut grade: une revue de la littérature.

The purpose of this literature systematic review was the use of stereotactic radiotherapy in glioma. Research was performed in Medline/PubMed and associated references found in published articles without publication date limit. The quality of series is variable and many biases can be evidenced. Only two randomized trials have been published using stereotactic radiotherapy for up-front treatment. There is a lack of evidence of survival advantages to use this treatment at the time of diagnosis or relapse. There is also insufficient evidence regarding the benefice/harms in the use of stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy for patients with glioma. No recommendations can be enounced. Stereotactic irradiation as boost in primary diagnosed glioma or relapsed tumour is not associated with survival improvement. For relapsed patients, treatment needs to be discussed according to the other treatment options.