Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 18(4): e426-e441, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34694907

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: People with cancer are at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. ASCO's COVID-19 registry promotes systematic data collection across US oncology practices. METHODS: Participating practices enter data on patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer treatment. In this analysis, we focus on all patients with hematologic or regional or metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Primary outcomes are 30- and 90-day mortality rates and change over time. RESULTS: Thirty-eight practices provided data for 453 patients from April to October 2020. Sixty-two percent had regional or metastatic solid tumors. Median age was 64 years. Forty-three percent were current or previous cigarette users. Patients with B-cell malignancies age 61-70 years had twice mortality risk (hazard ratio = 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3 to 3.3]) and those age > 70 years had 4.5 times mortality risk (95% CI, 1.8 to 11.1) compared with patients age ≤ 60 years. Association between survival and age was not significant in patients with metastatic solid tumors (P = .12). Tobacco users had 30-day mortality estimate of 21% compared with 11% for never users (log-rank P = .005). Patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 before June 2020 had 30-day mortality rate of 20% (95% CI, 14% to 25%) compared with 13% (8% to 18%) for those diagnosed in or after June 2020 (P = .08). The 90-day mortality rate for pre-June patients was 28% (21% to 34%) compared with 21% (13% to 28%; P = .20). CONCLUSION: Older patients with B-cell malignancies were at increased risk for death (unlike older patients with metastatic solid tumors), as were all patients with cancer who smoke tobacco. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 later in 2020 was associated with more favorable 30- and 90-day mortality, likely related to more asymptomatic cases and improved clinical management.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
2.
Am Surg ; 87(6): 979-981, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33295796

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The management of the pediatric trauma patient is variable among trauma centers. In some institutions, the trauma surgeon maintains control of the patient throughout the hospital stay, while others transfer to a pediatric specialist after the initial evaluation and resuscitation period. We hypothesized that handoff to the pediatric surgeon would decrease the length of stay by more efficient coordination with pediatric subspecialists and ancillary staff. METHODS: A retrospective review from October 2014 to October 2018 was conducted at our rural level 1 trauma center analyzing the length of stay across all demographics and trauma triage levels before and after institution of a handoff protocol from adult specialized trauma surgeons to pediatric surgeons within a 24-hour window. Further analysis included emergency department (ED) disposition to include the effect of handoff on the length of stay in the setting of a higher post-ED acuity, that is, disposition of monitored beds. RESULTS: 1267 patient charts were analyzed and the mean length of stay was reduced by .38 days (t = 5.92, P < .0005) across all demographics, trauma triage levels, post-ED dispositions, and mechanisms of injury after institution of our handoff protocol. CONCLUSION: Handoff from adult specialized trauma surgeons to pediatric surgeons within a 24-hour window at a rural level 1 trauma center significantly improved the length of stay by .38 (t = 5.92, P < .0005) among pediatric trauma patients in all demographics, trauma triage activations levels, mechanisms of injury, and post-ED dispositions acuity levels.


Subject(s)
Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Handoff/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals, Rural , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male
3.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 99, 2019 Jan 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674296

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Seroma formation is the most common complication after mastectomy and places patients at risk of associated morbidities. Microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) consists of hydrophilic, plant based, polysaccharide particles and is currently used as an absorbable hemostatic agent. An animal model evaluating MPH and seroma formation after mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection showed a significant decrease in seroma volume. Study aim was to evaluate topical MPH on the risk of post-mastectomy seroma formation as measured by total drain output and total drain days. METHODS: Prospective randomized single-blinded clinical trial of patients undergoing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. MPH was applied to the surgical site in the study group and no application in the control group. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled; eight were excluded due to missing data. Forty-two patients were evaluated, control (n = 21) vs. MPH (n = 21). No difference was identified between the two groups regarding demographics, tumor stage, total drain days, total drain output, number of clinic visits, or complication rates. On a subset analysis, body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 was identified as an independent risk factor for high drain output. Post hoc analyses of MPH controlling for BMI also revealed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the data presented in an animal model, no difference was demonstrated in the duration and quantity of serosanguinous drainage related to the use of MPH in patients undergoing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. BMI greater than 30 was identified as an independent risk factor for high drain output and this risk was not affected by MPH use. NCT03647930, retrospectively registered 08/2018.


Subject(s)
Drainage/methods , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Mastectomy/rehabilitation , Polysaccharides/administration & dosage , Surgical Wound/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Drainage/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Seroma/etiology , Seroma/prevention & control , Single-Blind Method , Surgical Wound/etiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 79(6): 995-1003; discussion 1003, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26680139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: When clinical examination is not reliable for brain death (BD) diagnosis, the preferred confirmatory test at our institution is nuclear medicine perfusion test (NMPT). Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has been described as an alternative for BD confirmation. This study was designed to quantitatively analyze CTA, assess its accuracy compared with NMPT, and define set parameters for BD confirmation. METHODS: This is a prospective clinical study, from 2007 to 2014, evaluating a consecutive series of clinically BD patients (n = 60) and randomly selected control group with normal CTA findings (n = 20). NMPT, used as the reference standard, was performed on all study patients followed immediately by CTA. Assessment of NMPT and quantitative CTA Hounsfield units of the horizontal segment of middle cerebral artery (M1), precommunicating segment of anterior cerebral artery (A1), and basilar artery (BA) was performed. RESULTS: In the study cohort, 88% demonstrated absence of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on NMPT; however, only 50% demonstrated absence on CTA. Together, 50% had no CBF on NMPT and CTA (Group 1), 38% had no CBF on NMPT but persistent CBF on CTA (Group 2), 12% had persistent CBF on both NMPT and CTA (Group 3). Analysis of variance demonstrated that all groups varied significantly for M1, A1, and BA (p < 0.001). We were able to establish criteria that differentiate persistent CBF on CTA as either preserved cerebral perfusion or stasis filling. CONCLUSION: We propose that a CTA Hounsfield units less than 80 in M1, A1, and BA is concordant with no CBF on NMPT, therefore indicative of a lack of physiologic cerebral perfusion, and thus allows the confirmation of BD with 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II.


Subject(s)
Brain Death/diagnosis , Cerebral Angiography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Angiography, Digital Subtraction , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Trauma Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...