The 8-foot up and go test is the best way to assess physical function in the rheumatoid arthritis clinic.

OBJECTIVES: RA is characterized by poor physical function, which compromises patients' quality of life and outcome. Clinical assessment of function is usually performed using self-reported questionnaires, such as the Multi-Dimensional HAQ (MDHAQ) and the Short Form-36 (physical component) (SF36-PC). However, such subjective measures may not accurately reflect real functional status. This study aimed to determine: (i) which clinically practicable objective test best represents overall physical function; and (ii) the extent to which self-reported subjective functional measures reflect objectively assessed function. METHODS: Objective [isometric knee extensor strength, handgrip strength, sit-to-stands in 30 s, 8-foot up and go (8'UG), 50-foot walk (50'W) and estimated aerobic capacity (V̇O2max)] and subjective (MDHAQ and SF36-PC) measures of function were correlated with one another to determine the best overall test of functional status in 82 well-controlled RA patients (DAS28 (s.d.) = 2.8 (1.0)). RESULTS: In rank order of size, averaged correlations (r) to the other outcome measures were as follows: 8'UG: 0.650; 50'W: 0.636; isometric knee extensor strength: 0.502; handgrip strength: 0.449; sit-to-stands in 30 s: 0.432; and estimated V̇O2max: 0.358. The MDHAQ was weakly (0.361) and the SF36-PC moderately correlated (0.415) with objective measures. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the most appropriate measure of objective physical function in RA patients is the 8'UG, followed by the 50'W. We found discordance between objectively and subjectively measured function. In clinical practice, an objective measure that is simple and quick to perform, such as the 8'UG, is advocated for assessing real functional status.

Tight control of disease activity fails to improve body composition or physical function in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: RA typically features rheumatoid cachexia [loss of muscle mass (MM) and excessive total fat mass (TFM), especially trunk FM], which contributes to physical disability. Since rheumatoid cachexia is driven by inflammation, it would be anticipated that the success of tight control of disease activity, such as treat-to-target (T2T), in attenuating inflammation would benefit body composition and physical function. This aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the impact of T2T on body composition and objectively assessed function in RA patients. METHODS: A total of 82 RA patients exclusively treated by T2T, were compared with 85 matched sedentary healthy controls (HCs). Body composition was estimated by DXA, with appendicular lean mass the surrogate measure of total MM. Physical function was assessed by knee extensor strength, handgrip strength, 30 s sit-to-stands, 8' up and go, and 50' walk (tests which reflect the ability to perform activities of daily living). RESULTS: Although generally well treated (mean DAS28 = 2.8, with 49% in remission), RA patients had ∼10% proportionally less appendicular lean mass and were considerably fatter (by ∼27%), particularly in the trunk (∼32%), than HCs. All measures of function were 24-34% poorer in the RA patients relative to HC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite marked improvements in disease control (most patients achieving or approaching remission), the relative loss of MM and increased adiposity in RA patients compared with matched HCs was similar to that observed pre-T2T. Additionally, performance of objective function tests was unchanged from that reported by our group for pre-T2T RA patients. Thus T2T, even in responsive RA patients, did not attenuate rheumatoid cachexia or improve objectively assessed function.