Association between cumulative surgeon experience and long-term outcomes in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

PURPOSE: While many factors have been correlated with lesser outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), the impact of surgeon experience has yet to be elucidated. We sought to evaluate the effect of cumulative surgeon experience on long-term complex AWR outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of all consecutive patients who underwent AWR using biologic mesh for the repair of ventral hernias or tumor resection defects from March 2005 to June 2019. The primary outcome measure was hernia recurrence (HR). Secondary outcomes were surgical site occurrences (SSOs) and surgical site infections (SSIs). Patients were a priori categorized into the following groups according to the cumulative number of hernia repairs performed by their surgeons: low (< 50), moderate experience (50-100), and high (> 100) experience. RESULTS: We identified 60 surgeons and 650 consecutive patients (62% women) who met our inclusion criteria. In adjusted models, AWR performed by surgeons with high experience was associated with a fourfold lower risk of HR (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.08 to 0.87), but the odds of surgical site occurrences (odds ratio, 0.72, 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 1.52) and surgical site infections (odds ratio, 0.89, 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 2.86) did not differ significantly in the high-experience group. CONCLUSIONS: High surgical experience, defined as > 100 cumulative hernia repairs, is predictive for markedly lower HR rates in complex AWR. These findings have potential implications for preoperative risk assessment, patient-centered surgeon selection, regulatory oversight, specific referral patterns, designations of centers of excellence, and individual provider or trainee quality improvement.

Multimodal imaging of hair follicle bulge-derived stem cells in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a devastating event for which current therapies are limited. Stem cell transplantation may lead to recovery of function via different mechanisms, such as cell replacement through differentiation, stimulation of angiogenesis and support to the microenvironment. Adult hair follicle bulge-derived stem cells (HFBSCs) possess neuronal differentiation capacity, are easy to harvest and are relatively immune-privileged, which makes them potential candidates for autologous stem cell-based therapy. In this study, we apply in vivo multimodal, optical and magnetic resonance imaging techniques to investigate the behavior of mouse HFBSCs in a mouse model of TBI. HFBSCs expressed Luc2 and copGFP and were examined for their differentiation capacity in vitro. Subsequently, transduced HFBSCs, preloaded with ferumoxytol, were transplanted next to the TBI lesion (cortical region) in nude mice, 2 days after injury. Brains were fixed for immunohistochemistry 58 days after transplantation. Luc2- and copGFP-expressing, ferumoxytol-loaded HFBSCs showed adequate neuronal differentiation potential in vitro. Bioluminescence of the lesioned brain revealed survival of HFBSCs and magnetic resonance imaging identified their localization in the area of transplantation. Immunohistochemistry showed that transplanted cells stained for nestin and neurofilament protein (NF-Pan). Cells also expressed laminin and fibronectin but extracellular matrix masses were not detected. After 58 days, ferumoxytol could be detected in HFBSCs in brain tissue sections. These results show that HFBSCs are able to survive after brain transplantation and suggest that cells may undergo differentiation towards a neuronal cell lineage, which supports their potential use for cell-based therapy for TBI.

International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence challenges clinical decision-making when breast reconstruction is considered in the context of radiotherapy. Current literature was evaluated and key statements on topical issues were generated and discussed by an expert panel at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting in Milan 2017. METHODS: Studies on radiotherapy and breast reconstruction (1985 to September 2017) were screened using MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL. The literature review yielded 30 controversial key questions. A set of key statements was derived and the highest levels of clinical evidence (LoE) for each of these were summarized. Nineteen panellists convened for dedicated discussions at the International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting to express agreement, disagreement or abstention for the generated key statements. RESULTS: The literature review identified 1522 peer-reviewed publications. A list of 22 key statements was produced, with the highest LoE recorded for each statement. These ranged from II to IV, with most statements (11 of 22, 50 per cent) supported by LoE III. There was full consensus for nine (41 per cent) of the 22 key statements, and more than 75 per cent agreement was reached for half (11 of 22). CONCLUSION: Poor evidence exists on which to base patient-informed consent. Low-quality studies are conflicting with wide-ranging treatment options, precluding expert consensus regarding optimal type and timing of breast reconstruction in the context of radiotherapy. There is a need for high-quality evidence from prospective registries and randomized trials in this field.

ANTECEDENTES: El hecho de que la evidencia disponible sea conflictiva supone un reto para la toma de decisiones a la hora de considerar la reconstrucción mamaria en el contexto de radioterapia (radiotherapy, RT). En el seno de un panel de expertos reunidos durante el International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting celebrado en Milán en 2017, se revisó la literatura disponible y se generaron y discutieron los aspectos más relevantes. MÉTODOS: Se hizo una búsqueda bibliográfica de los estudios de RT y reconstrucción mamaria (1985-septiembre de 2017) en las bases MEDLINE, EMBASE y CENTRAL. La revisión de la literatura permitió identificar 30 cuestiones clave controvertidas. A partir de ellas, se construyeron una serie de afirmaciones, para las que se obtuvo el mayor nivel de evidencia (levels of clinical evidence, LoE) posible. El acuerdo, desacuerdo o abstención respecto a las cuestiones propuestas fueron el resultado de las discusiones de 19 expertos reunidos durante el International Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Meeting. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 1.522 artículos publicados en revistas con peer review. Se elaboró una lista de 22 afirmaciones clave y se anotó el LoE más alto obtenido para cada una de ellas. El grado de variabilidad fue de II a IV, pero la mayoría de las afirmaciones (54,5%) obtuvieron un LoE III. Hubo un consenso total en el 41% (9/22) de las afirmaciones, mientras que se obtuvo más de un 75% de acuerdo en la mitad de las afirmaciones (11/22). CONCLUSIÓN: La evidencia en la que basar el consentimiento informado en estos pacientes es escasa. Se trata de estudios de baja calidad con gran variedad de opciones terapéuticas, que dificultan el consenso de los expertos acerca del tipo y momento óptimo para la reconstrucción mamaria en el contexto de RT. Para obtener datos de mayor calidad se precisan estudios prospectivos y ensayos clínicos en este campo.

Active Nano-targeting of Macrophages.

Macrophages play a role in almost every disease such as cancer, infections, injuries, metabolic and inflammatory diseases and are becoming an attractive therapeutic target. However, understanding macrophage diversity, tissue distribution and plasticity will help in defining precise targeting strategies and effective therapies. Active targeting of macrophages using nanoparticles for therapeutic purposes is still at its infancy but holds promises since macrophages have shown high specific uptake of nanoparticles. Here, we highlight recent progress in active nanotechnology-based systems gaining pivotal roles to target diverse macrophage subsets in diseased tissues.

VEGF-initiated blood-retinal barrier breakdown in early diabetes.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to (1) determine whether endogenous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) triggers diabetic blood-retinal barrier breakdown, and (2) identify the site as well as phenotype of the hyperpermeable diabetic retinal vessels. METHODS: Retinal VEGF mRNA levels were quantified in 1-week diabetic rats using the RNase protection assay. VEGF bioactivity was blocked via the systemic administration of a highly specific VEGF-neutralizing soluble Flt/F(c) construct (VEGF TrapA(40)). An inactive IL6 receptor/F(c) construct (IL6R Trap) was used as an isotype control. Blood-retinal barrier breakdown was quantified using the Evans blue technique and was spatially localized with fluorescent microspheres. RESULTS: Retinal VEGF mRNA levels in 1-week diabetic animals were 3.2-fold higher than in nondiabetic controls (P < 0.0001). Similarly, retinal vascular permeability in 8-day diabetic animals was 1.8-fold higher than in normal nondiabetic controls (P < 0.05). Diabetes-induced blood-retinal barrier breakdown was dose-dependently inhibited with VEGF TrapA(40), with 25 mg/kg producing complete inhibition of the diabetes-induced increases (P < 0.05). Blood-retinal barrier breakdown in diabetic animals treated with solvent alone or IL6R Trap did not differ significantly from untreated diabetic animals (P > 0.05). Spatially, early blood-retinal barrier breakdown was localized to the retinal venules and capillaries of the superficial retinal vasculature. CONCLUSIONS: Early blood-retinal barrier breakdown in experimental diabetes is VEGF dependent and is restricted, in part, to the venules and capillaries of the superficial inner retinal vasculature. VEGF inhibition should prove a useful therapeutic approach in the treatment of early diabetic blood-retinal barrier breakdown.