Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 105
Filter
1.
AIDS Care ; 35(6): 876-882, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277091

ABSTRACT

Previous studies showed that Erotic industry sShows (ES) were appropriate events for sexual health promotion and testing interventions. A cross-sectional survey exploring screening practices, sexual behaviors, substance use, and sexual motives for substance use was conducted in ES in December 2017 and completed by 781 respondents. Overall, . Eighteen18% percent reported substance use in the last 3 months (51% alcohol), 26%. Twenty-six percent reported a sexual purpose for substance use. Main sexual partners were spouse (68%), regular (21%), unknown (18%) and several (17%) partners. Main sexual practices were libertinism (22%), partner swapping (15%) and threesome (15%). Twenty-seven percent of respondents reported cContactless sex was reported by 27% of the respondents. 18% reported no previous HIV test. Univariate analysis showed that having or not previous HIV test was linked to male sex (76.8% vs. 54.5%, p < 10-3), alcohol consumption in the last three months (58.7% vs. 49.4%, p = .043), number of drugs in a lifetime (1.3% vs. 1.6%, p = .022), sexual partnership with spouse/long-term partner (57.3% vs. 70.5%; p = .002), at least one multiple-partner sexual practice (23.1% vs. 31.8%, p = .040) and type of sexual attraction (p = <10-3). Results contribute to establishing the usefulness of HIV-testing and awareness campaigns in ES eventsand informing potential combined risk behaviors and related interventions.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Substance-Related Disorders , Male , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Sexual Behavior , Sexual Partners , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Risk-Taking
3.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 30(12): 923-9, 2011 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22040869

ABSTRACT

In recent decades, anaesthesia and surgery have undergone major scientific and technical developments. However, these improvements have not solved a recurring problem, communication deficiencies within teams in charge of surgical patients. Current figures show that 21% to 65% of accidents and errors in patient management during the perioperative period are related to communication problems. These problems occur when gaps arise in the continuity and coordination of care within teams. Some of the contributing factors to these gaps are emergency status of patients, staff shifts and handovers following patient transfers. To minimize the impact of these phenomena, it is important to improve standardization of information flow within operating theatres and to improve teamwork between anaesthetists and surgeons. This can be done through crew resource management training programs or simulation. This should ultimately contribute to minimise medical error and improve the overall quality of care provided to patients in operating theatres and during all the perioperative period.


Subject(s)
Communication , Perioperative Period , Risk Management , Humans , Risk Factors
4.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 141: w13251, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21971666

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To control healthcare costs, Federal and Cantonal states have introduced policies to limit expenses and the number of practising physicians. It is unclear to date whether these policies have had a real impact on anaesthetists in Switzerland. The aim of the current study was to assess the density, characteristics and satisfaction of anaesthetists in Latin Switzerland and to compare the results with data collected before the introduction of cost containment policies in 2002. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional study between March and July 2009 and included all practicing anaesthetists in Latin Switzerland. A questionnaire consisting of 103 items analysing demographics, activity and job satisfaction was used. The results were analysed and compared to a previous survey conducted in 2002. RESULTS: Compared to 2002, there was an overall 12% increase in the number of practising anaesthetists who were older and more often females (42% versus 35% in 2002 (p = 0.06)). The number of non-Swiss anaesthetists significantly increased to 19% compared to 11% in 2002 (p <0.05). In contrast, working hours in public hospitals decreased from 59 to 53 hours/week (p <0.001). The majority of anaesthetists considered that their overall personal situation was better than in the previous 10 years and 87.7% considered that these measures had no impact on their future plans. CONCLUSIONS: Implicit rationing policies introduced in Switzerland to limit healthcare costs and the number of physicians has had no impact on anaesthetists' workforce density, working conditions and overall satisfaction in Latin Switzerland. This opens the question of the real usefulness of these policies, at least for anaesthetists.


Subject(s)
Job Satisfaction , Nurse Anesthetists/supply & distribution , Public Policy , Adult , Cost Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse Anesthetists/psychology , Switzerland , Workload
6.
J Hosp Infect ; 77(4): 304-8, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21288595

ABSTRACT

There are few data on indications for central venous catheter (CVC) use. We conducted an observational, hospital-wide prospective cohort study to quantify the indications for catheter placement over dwell time and to investigate agreement between healthcare workers (HCWs) on CVC use. Catheter use was observed by on-site visits, HCW interviews, and screening of patient charts. A total of 378 CVCs were inserted in 292 patients, accounting for 2704 catheter-days. Of these, 93% CVCs were multilumen catheters and 70% were placed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Median dwell time (interquartile range) was 5 (2-9) days overall, and 4 (2-7) and 8 (3-15) in the ICU and non-ICU settings, respectively. The mean number of specified indications for CVC use per day was 1.7 (1.9 for ICU and 1.5 for non-ICU; P<0.001). The most frequent reason (49%) for catheter use was prolonged (>7 days) antibiotic therapy followed by parenteral nutrition (22.3%). A total of 130 catheter-days (4.8%) were unnecessary with a higher proportion in non-ICU settings (6.6%). In 94% of cases, there was agreement among HCWs on indications for CVC use. However, 35 on-site visits (8.3%) in non-ICU settings revealed that neither the nurse nor the treating physician knew why the catheter was in place. ICU catheters have a short dwell time but are utilised more often, whereas catheters in non-ICU settings show a reverse characteristic. Prevention measures targeting catheter care are more likely to be successful in non-ICU settings.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
7.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 39(5): 371-8, 2010 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20598813

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Clinical indicators are increasingly used to assess safety of patient care. In obstetrics, only a few indicators have been validated to date and none is used across specialties. The purpose of this study was to identify and assess for face and content validity a group of safety indicators that could be used by anaesthetists, obstetricians and neonatologists involved in labour and delivery units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We first conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify potential measures. Indicators were then validated by a panel of 30 experts representing all specialties working in labour and delivery units. We used the Delphi method, an iterative questionnaire-based consensus seeking technique. Experts determined on a 7-point Likert scale (1=most representative/7=less representative) the soundness of each indicator as a measure of safety and their possible association with errors and complications caused by medical management. RESULTS: We identified 44 potential clinical indicators from the literature. Following the Delphi process, 13 indicators were considered as highly representative of safety during obstetrical care (mean score

Subject(s)
Obstetrics , Patient Care , Safety Management/methods , Anesthesia, Obstetrical/standards , Consensus , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Labor, Obstetric , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Neonatology/standards , Obstetrics/standards , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
J Hosp Infect ; 73(1): 41-6, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19646788

ABSTRACT

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections and cause considerable morbidity, mortality, and resource use. CRBSI surveillance serves quality improvement, but is often restricted to intensive care units (ICUs). We conducted a four-month prospective cohort study of all non-cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs) to design an efficient CRBSI surveillance and prevention programme. CVCs were assessed on a daily basis for ward exposure time, care parameters, and the occurrence of laboratory-confirmed CRBSI. Overall, 248 patients with 426 CVCs accounted for 3567 CVC-days (median: 5) and 15 CRBSI episodes. CVCs were inserted by anaesthetists, ICU physicians and internists in 45%, 47%, and 8% of cases, respectively. CVC utilisation rates for intensive care, internal medicine, non-abdominal surgery and abdominal surgery were 29.8, 3.8, 1.7 and 4.9 per 100 patient-days, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients changed wards while having a CVC in place, so spending CVC-days at risk within multiple departments. CRBSI incidence densities for ICU, internal medicine, surgery and abdominal surgery were 5.6, 1.9, 2.4 and 7.7 per 1000 CVC-days at risk, respectively. In a univariate Cox proportional hazards model, the high CRBSI rate in abdominal surgery was associated with longer CVC duration, frequent use of parenteral nutrition and CVC insertion by anaesthetists. CRBSI numbers were insufficient to perform a multivariate analysis. Our surveillance revealed similar CRBSI rates in both ICU and non-ICU departments, and when frequent ward transfers occurred. Hospital-wide CRBSI surveillance is advisable when a large proportion of CVC-days occur outside the ICU.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
10.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 17(6): 454-8, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19064662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The potential severity of wrong patient/procedure/site of surgery and the view that these events are avoidable, make the prevention of such errors a priority. An intervention was set up to develop a verification protocol for checking patient identity and the site of surgery with periodic audits to measure compliance while providing feedback. ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM: A nurse auditor performed the compliance audits in inpatients and outpatients during three consecutive 3-month periods and three 1-month follow-up periods; 11 audit criteria were recorded, as well as reasons for not performing a check. STRATEGY FOR CHANGE: The nurse auditor provided feedback to the health professionals, including discussion of inadequate checks. RESULTS: 1,000 interactions between patients and their anaesthetist or nurse anaesthetist were observed. Between the first and second audit periods compliance with all audit criteria except "surgical site marked" noticeably improved, such as the proportion of patients whose identities were checked (62.6% to 81.4%); full compliance with protocol in patient identity checks (9.7% to 38.1%); proportion of site of surgery checks carried out (77.1% to 92.6%); and full compliance with protocol in site of surgery checks (32.2% to 52.0%). Thereafter, compliance was stable for most criteria. The reason for failure to perform checks of patient identity or site of surgery was mostly that the anaesthetist in charge had seen the patient at the preanaesthetic consultation. LESSONS AND MESSAGES: By combining the implementation of a verification protocol with periodic audits with feedback, the intervention changed practice and increased compliance with patient identity and site of surgery checks. The impact of the intervention was limited by communication problems between patients and professionals, and lack of collaboration with surgical services.


Subject(s)
Feedback , Guideline Adherence , Management Audit , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Patient Identification Systems/standards , Guideline Adherence/organization & administration , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care
11.
Anaesthesia ; 63(12): 1358-64, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19032306

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: Several indirect laryngoscopes have recently been developed, but relatively few have been formally compared. In this study we evaluated the efficacy and the usability of the Macintosh, the Glidescope, the McGrath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes. Sixty anaesthesia providers (20 staff, 20 residents, and 20 nurses) were enrolled into this study. The volunteers intubated the trachea of a Laerdal SimMan manikin in three simulated difficult airway scenarios. In all scenarios, indirect laryngoscopes provided better laryngeal exposure than the Macintosh blade and appeared to produce less dental trauma. In the most difficult scenario (tongue oedema), the Macintosh blade was associated with a high rate of failure and prolonged intubation times whereas indirect laryngoscopes improved intubation time and rarely failed. Indirect laryngoscopes were judged easier to use than the Macintosh. Differences existed between indirect devices. The Airtraq consistently provided the most rapid intubation. Laryngeal grade views were superior with the Airtraq and McGrath than with the Glidescope.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopes , Adult , Airway Obstruction/complications , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cervical Vertebrae , Clinical Competence , Edema/complications , Humans , Immobilization , Laryngoscopy , Manikins , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Tongue Diseases/complications
12.
Anaesthesia ; 62(11): 1090-4, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17924887

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of differences in drug label information on injectable drug selection errors. Differences in the display of drug strength information were assessed in a randomised controlled trial involving ward nurses, intensive care nurses, nurse anaesthetists, ward physicians, and anaesthetists. A set of 24 on-screen tasks were constructed. For each task, a label corresponding to an instruction consisting of two from three possible pieces of information (concentration, quantity, volume) had to be selected from a list of 10 items. The set was presented three times to participants using three different label formats. Format A provided two pieces of strength information different from those in the instruction. Format B and C provided all three pieces in a random and a fixed sequence, respectively. The frequency of errors was statistically higher with formats A and B than with format C, and greater in nurses than in anaesthetists. Regulatory bodies should therefore implement a standard requiring that the concentration (expressed in 'mg x ml(-1)'), the amount and the volume of drug be displayed on medication labels in fixed locations.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Drug Labeling/methods , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Computer Simulation , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Labeling/standards , Humans , Injections , Medical Staff, Hospital/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Switzerland
14.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 50(9): 1114-9, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16987341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A potentially dangerous situation was revealed by an incident report describing the use of an inappropriate device to administer post-operative epidural analgesia to a patient on a surgical ward. The incident occurred in a 1200-bed university affiliated tertiary hospital (Geneva University Hospitals, HUG) and involved three clinical departments: anaesthesiology, the surgical intensive care unit and urology. METHODS: A multidisciplinary system analysis was carried out to identify care-delivery problems and contributory factors. Corrective actions were devised on the basis of their ability to prevent and absorb unsafe situations. RESULTS: The system analysis identified three care-delivery problems in relation to the management of epidural analgesia. It enabled medical and nursing managers to adopt an interdepartmental set of corrective actions: a common protocol for post-operative epidural analgesia, leading to the exclusive use of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pumps; greater availability of the patient-controlled pumps; the dissemination of guidelines; permanent proactive training of nurses by the acute-pain team; the clarification of medical responsibilities; and a common help-line phone number for all surgical departments. DISCUSSION: The analysis provided a convincing exposure of various care-delivery problems and their corresponding contributory factors, as well as an opportunity to address a systemic issue in a multidisciplinary way. By thus facilitating decisions and corrective actions, the analysis was instrumental in strengthening our safety culture.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Systems Analysis , Adult , Analgesia, Epidural/instrumentation , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Clinical Competence , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Infusion Pumps , Male , Nurses , Organizational Culture , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Patient Care Team , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Risk Management , Safety
15.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 25(1): 50-62, 2006 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16099129

ABSTRACT

Informing patients about available treatments, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the associated risks, is critical to obtain an informed consent and is the responsibility of physicians, including anaesthesiologists. However, risks issues are not systematically discussed during anaesthesia consultations or are addressed in a vague and incomplete way. In order to improve communication and the quality of the informed consent, it is therefore essential to scrutinize problems linked to communication about risks. This article is based on a review of French and English literature on perception and communication about medical risks. Its objectives are for the one hand to summarize the main difficulties concerning risk communication in medicine and, on the other hand, to offer tools that can foster quality communication with patients especially during anaesthesia consultations.


Subject(s)
Informed Consent , Patient Education as Topic , Preoperative Care , Communication , Humans , Risk Assessment , Terminology as Topic
20.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 22(9): 778-86, 2003 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14612165

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine on a national level the factors associated with the use of laparoscopy for digestive surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Nation wide study using a large representative sample (3 days of anaesthesia in France). METHODS: Univariate followed by multivariate analyses of data gathered in 1996 during the survey led by the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive care ("SFAR") including 2847 surgical procedures for cholecystectomy, appendicectomy or inguinal herniorraphy. RESULTS: Independent factors associated with the use of laparoscopy were: for cholecystectomy: age (less frequent when > or =71 years: adjusted Odds ratio [AOR] 0.4), sex (more frequent in female: AOR 1.7), ASA physical status (less frequent when > or =3: AOR 0.5), private hospital (AOR 2.0), procedure scheduled at least the night before (AOR 2.1), and use of closed circuit general anaesthesia (AOR 1.6); for appendectomy: age >15 years (AOR 1.9-2.2), female (AOR 2.1), private hospital (AOR 2.7), scheduled procedure (AOR 2.1), prolonged procedure (AOR 8.4), endotracheal intubation (AOR 16.7), and closed circuit (AOR 2.7); for inguinal herniorraphy: ASA physical status (less frequent when > or =3: AOR 0.4), private hospital (AOR 3.4), prolonged procedure (AOR 5.6), and endotracheal intubation (AOR 21.6). Association with a closed circuit was confirmed for general anaesthesia using a volatile agent (AOR 1.5). Overall, ambulatory surgery was rarely performed and used only for open procedures. Regional anaesthesia was used only for inguinal open herniorraphy. CONCLUSION: These data obtained from a large national survey confirmed the higher frequency of laparoscopy in middle aged patients, female (except for inguinal herniorraphy), without important comorbidity, in private hospitals. Laparoscopy was associated with prolonged procedures and with a change in the anaesthetic technique for appendicectomy and inguinal herniorraphy: tracheal intubation was almost constantly used. Whatever the procedure, closed circuit anaesthesia was more frequently used when surgery was performed under laparoscopy, reflecting newer equipment of the hospital, private or public.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/statistics & numerical data , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/statistics & numerical data , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Anesthesia, Closed-Circuit , Anesthesia, General , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Collection , Decision Making , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , France/epidemiology , Hernia, Inguinal/epidemiology , Hospitals, Private , Humans , Infant , Intubation, Intratracheal , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...