ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The health needs of the population are changing and the health care system must adapt to meet them. In France, the need for prevention is significant and recognized. Yet the shift toward prevention is struggling to take hold in primary care, and prevention indicators remain low. PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: This article presents the developments and challenges involved in integrating prevention into primary care. It is based on three leading French reports on the subject. RESULTS: Prevention and health promotion initiatives are described as poorly organized, being based on individual and opportunistic initiatives. In particular, this is due to the difficulty of integrating a collective, long-term dimension into preventive clinical practices, even though most preventive situations require a coordinated, repeated approach that is integrated intothe care offered. At the same time, the primary care system is being structured around coordinated practice. These organizational changes are opportunities to integrate prevention into the practices of primary care professionals. CONCLUSIONS: A great deal depends on successfully integrating prevention into the structuring and organizational evolution of the primary care system. The convergence of the operationalization of the preventive shift and the organizational transformation of the primary care system is potentially synergistic for the integration of prevention. But this development is not self-evident and must be accompanied by precise, up-to-date, and contextualized knowledge of the factors influencing the practice of prevention.
Subject(s)
Primary Health Care , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , France , Health Promotion , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The global burden of non-communicable diseases is increasing and the need for prevention is huge. Policies have yet to produce results and prevention indicators remain low. Primary care (PC) represents an opportunity to optimise the practice of prevention, but GPs are coming up against barriers that are holding back their prevention practices. AIM: The aim of this overview of reviews is to identify the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of routine prevention practices in PC. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study is an international overview of reviews focusing on the integration of prevention in PC settings. METHOD: The search was conducted on July 2022 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Included reviews are: systematic reviews or scoping reviews adopting a systematic approach. RESULTS: The 35 reviews included identify multiple barriers and facilitators related to the integration of prevention in PC. These factors are very heterogeneous as regards their source (the patient, the professional and the health system) and their level of action (individual, organisational or contextual). The results show the need to organise PC at the professional level (e.g. in training), at the local level (e.g. partnerships) and at the political level (e.g. funding model). CONCLUSION: The factors influencing the integration of prevention in PC are multiple and act at different levels (individual, organisational and health system level). Organisation factors play a major role and seem to be a means of overcoming the difficulties encountered by healthcare professionals in developing preventive practices.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of smoking among pregnant women is the highest in the European region, making smoking cessation a public health priority. In order to address this, pregnant smokers need to be better supported by their healthcare professionals in their attempts to quit smoking. The 5As model, which is a psychosocial intervention, seems to be effective in this specific population. The objective of this review is to identify the factors that act as barriers or facilitators to the implementation of the 5As model within prenatal practices. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of the literature on PubMed and Scopus databases, using the terms: 'smoking cessation', 'pregnan*', and ('5A' or '5As'). The identified factors were categorized using a theoretical framework of The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. RESULTS: Among the 43 articles identified in the databases, 13 articles were included in this review. In total, we identified 48 factors. When necessary, we grouped them together, resulting in 12 sub-categories, which in turn were grouped into 9 categories. Those 9 categories were then classified into the 3 levels of the theoretical framework: the clinical level (motivation), the organizational level (healthcare pathway), and the health system level (political environment). CONCLUSIONS: The factors identified are varied and numerous and are involved in each level of the theoretical framework.
