Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Front Physiol ; 14: 1148916, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37008016

ABSTRACT

Both physiology and pathophysiology are essential disciplines in health professional education however, clinicians do not use this knowledge in isolation. Instead, physicians use inter-disciplinary concepts embedded within integrated cognitive schema (illness scripts) established through experience/knowledge that manifest as expert-level thinking. Our goal was to develop a pre-clerkship curriculum devoid of disciplinary boundaries (akin to the physician's illness script) and enhance learners' clerkship and early clinical performance. As well as developing curricular content, the model considered non-content design elements such as learner characteristics and values, faculty and resources and the impact of curricular and pedagogical changes. The goals of the trans-disciplinary integration were to develop deep learning behaviors through, 1) developing of integrated, cognitive schema to support the transition to expert-level thinking, 2) authentic, contextualization to promote knowledge transfer to the clinical realm 3) allowing autonomous, independent learning, and 4) harnessing the benefits of social learning. The final curricular model was a case-based approach with independent learning of basic concepts, differential diagnosis and illness scripting writing, and concept mapping. Small-group classroom sessions were team-taught with basic scientists and physicians facilitating learners' self-reflection and development of clinical reasoning. Specifications grading was used to assess the products (written illness scripts and concept maps) as well as process (group dynamics) while allowing a greater degree of learner autonomy. Although the model we adopted could be transferred to other program settings, we suggest it is critical to consider both content and non-content elements that are specific to the environment and learner.

2.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 147(9): 729-38, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27233680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, investigators have reported transmissions of blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) in dental settings. In this article, the authors describe these transmissions and examine the lapses in infection prevention on the basis of available information. METHODS: The authors reviewed the literature from 2003 through 2015 to identify reports of the transmission of BBPs in dental settings and related lapses in infection prevention efforts, as well as to identify reports of known or suspected health care-associated BBP infections submitted by state health departments to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. RESULTS: The authors identified 3 published reports whose investigators described the transmission of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus. In 2 of these reports, the investigators described single-transmission events (from 1 patient to another) in outpatient oral surgery practices. The authors of the third report described the possible transmission of hepatitis B virus to 3 patients and 2 dental health care personnel in a large temporary dental clinic. The authors identified lapses in infection prevention practices that occurred during 2 of the investigations; however, the investigators were not always able to link a specific lapse to a transmission event. Examples of lapses included the failure to heat-sterilize handpieces between patients, a lack of training for volunteers on BBPs, and the use of a combination of unsafe injection practices. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that reports describing the transmission of BBPs in dental settings since 2003 were rare. Failure to adhere to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for infection control in dental settings likely led to disease transmission in these cases. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The existence of these reports emphasizes the need to improve dental health care personnel's understanding of the basic principles and implementation of standard precautions through the use of checklists, policies, and practices.


Subject(s)
Blood-Borne Pathogens , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Dental Care/adverse effects , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Contamination , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Oral Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Sterilization , United States/epidemiology
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(5): 822-8, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24751181

ABSTRACT

We conducted a study to determine prevalence of HPV types in oropharyngeal cancers in the United States and establish a prevaccine baseline for monitoring the impact of vaccination. HPV DNA was extracted from tumor tissue samples from patients in whom cancer was diagnosed during 1995-2005. The samples were obtained from cancer registries and Residual Tissue Repository Program sites in the United States. HPV was detected and typed by using PCR reverse line blot assays. Among 557 invasive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, 72% were positive for HPV and 62% for vaccine types HPV16 or 18. Prevalence of HPV-16/18 was lower in women (53%) than in men (66%), and lower in non-Hispanic Black patients (31%) than in other racial/ethnic groups (68%-80%). Results indicate that vaccines could prevent most oropharyngeal cancers in the United States, but their effect may vary by demographic variables.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/classification , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Prevalence , Public Health Surveillance , Registries , United States/epidemiology
5.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 144(10): 1110-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24080927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission in dental settings is rare, in 2009 a cluster of acute HBV infections was reported among attendees of a two-day portable dental clinic in West Virginia. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective investigation by using treatment records and volunteer logs, interviews of patients and volunteers with acute HBV infection as well as of other clinic volunteers, and molecular sequencing of the virus from those acutely infected. RESULTS: The clinic was held under the auspices of a charitable organization in a gymnasium staffed by 750 volunteers, including dental care providers who treated 1,137 adults. Five acute HBV infections-involving three patients and two volunteers-were identified by the local and state health departments. Of four viral isolates available for testing, all were genotype D. Three case patients underwent extractions; one received restorations and one a dental prophylaxis. None shared a treatment provider with any of the others. One case volunteer worked in maintenance; the other directed patients from triage to the treatment waiting area. Case patients reported no behavioral risk factors for HBV infection. The investigation revealed numerous infection control breaches. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission of HBV to three patients and two volunteers is likely to have occurred at a portable dental clinic. Specific breaches in infection control could not be linked to these HBV transmissions. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: All dental settings should adhere to recommended infection control practices, including oversight; training in prevention of bloodborne pathogens transmission; receipt of HBV vaccination for staff who may come into contact with blood or body fluids; use of appropriate personal protective equipment, sterilization and disinfection procedures; and use of measures, such as high-volume suction, to minimize the spread of blood.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/transmission , Dental Clinics , Hepatitis B/transmission , Adult , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Humans , Mobile Health Units , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , West Virginia/epidemiology
6.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 143(10): 1127-38, 2012 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23024311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW: The authors set out to identify factors associated with implementation by U.S. dentists of four practices first recommended in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings-2003. METHODS: In 2008, the authors surveyed a stratified random sample of 6,825 U.S. dentists. The response rate was 49 percent. The authors gathered data regarding dentists' demographic and practice characteristics, attitudes toward infection control, sources of instruction regarding the guidelines and knowledge about the need to use sterile water for surgical procedures. Then they assessed the impact of those factors on the implementation of four recommendations: having an infection control coordinator, maintaining dental unit water quality, documenting percutaneous injuries and using safer medical devices, such as safer syringes and scalpels. The authors conducted bivariate analyses and proportional odds modeling. RESULTS: Responding dentists in 34 percent of practices had implemented none or one of the four recommendations, 40 percent had implemented two of the recommendations and 26 percent had implemented three or four of the recommendations. The likelihood of implementation was higher among dentists who acknowledged the importance of infection control, had practiced dentistry for less than 30 years, had received more continuing dental education credits in infection control, correctly identified more surgical procedures that require the use of sterile water, worked in larger practices and had at least three sources of instruction regarding the guidelines. Dentists with practices in the South Atlantic, Middle Atlantic or East South Central U.S. Census divisions were less likely to have complied. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the four recommendations varied among U.S. dentists. Strategies targeted at raising awareness of the importance of infection control, increasing continuing education requirements and developing multiple modes of instruction may increase implementation of current and future Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.


Subject(s)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Guidelines as Topic , Health Plan Implementation , Infection Control, Dental/standards , Practice Patterns, Dentists'/statistics & numerical data , Administrative Personnel , Canada , Dental Instruments , Education, Dental, Continuing , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Infection Control, Dental/methods , Infection Control, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration , Water Microbiology
7.
Tex Dent J ; 129(5): 491-507, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22779205

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This article presents evidence-based clinical recommendations developed by a panel convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. This report addresses the potential benefits and potential risks of screening for oral squamous cell carcinomas and the use of adjunctive screening aids to visualize and detect potentially malignant and malignant oral lesions. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The panel members conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, identifying 332 systematic reviews and 1,499 recent clinical studies. They selected 5 systematic reviews and 4 clinical studies to use as a basis for developing recommendations. RESULTS: The panel concluded that screening by means of visual and tactile examination to detect potentially malignant and malignant lesions may result in detection of oral cancers at early stages of development, but that there is insufficient evidence to determine if screening alters disease-specific mortality in asymptomatic people seeking dental care. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The panel suggested that clinicians remain alert for signs of potentially malignant lesions or early-stage cancers while performing routine visual and tactile examinations in all patients, but particularly in those who use tobacco or who consume alcohol heavily. Additional research regarding oral cancer screening and the use of adjuncts is needed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Evidence-Based Dentistry , Mass Screening/methods , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Alcohol Drinking , American Dental Association , Asymptomatic Diseases , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Coloring Agents , Cytodiagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Incidence , Light , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Physical Examination , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Smoking , Tolonium Chloride , United States/epidemiology
9.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 142(8): 915-24, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21804058

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Results from studies conducted in the past several years suggest that some oropharyngeal cancers, those of the base of the tongue and the tonsils, are associated with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV). In this article, the authors summarize the available evidence regarding the epidemiology of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers in the United States, the available HPV vaccines and the implications of these for dentistry. They also examine the differences in HPV prevalence between cancers of the oral cavity and those of the oropharynx. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and the National Guideline Clearinghouse to identify English-language systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers published from January 2005 through May 2011. RESULTS: Molecular and epidemiologic evidence suggest a strong etiologic association of HPV with oropharyngeal cancers. The incidence of oropharyngeal cancers in the United States has increased between 1973 and 2007, whereas that of cancers at other head and neck sites has decreased steadily. Compared with HPV-negative cancers, HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers are associated with certain sexual behaviors, occur more often among white men and people who do not use tobacco or alcohol, and may occur in a population younger by about four years (median ages, 52-56 years). Despite often having a later stage of diagnosis, people with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers have a lower risk of dying or recurrence than do those with HPV-negative cancers. The effectiveness of the HPV vaccine in preventing oropharyngeal cancers is unknown. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dental health care personnel (DHCP) should be knowledgeable about the role of HPV in carcinogenesis, the association of HPV with oropharyngeal cancers and HPV vaccines, and they should be prompt in referring patients with suggestive symptoms for evaluation. DHCP can play an important role in increasing patients' knowledge about HPV and oropharyngeal cancers.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/physiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Age Factors , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/virology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Risk Factors , Sexual Behavior , United States/epidemiology
10.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 141(5): 509-20, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20436098

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This article presents evidence-based clinical recommendations developed by a panel convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. This report addresses the potential benefits and potential risks of screening for oral squamous cell carcinomas and the use of adjunctive screening aids to visualize and detect potentially malignant and malignant oral lesions. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The panel members conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, identifying 332 systematic reviews and 1,499 recent clinical studies. They selected five systematic reviews and four clinical studies to use as a basis for developing recommendations. RESULTS: The panel concluded that screening by means of visual and tactile examination to detect potentially malignant and malignant lesions may result in detection of oral cancers at early stages of development, but that there is insufficient evidence to determine if screening alters disease-specific mortality in asymptomatic people seeking dental care. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The panel suggested that clinicians remain alert for signs of potentially malignant lesions or early-stage cancers while performing routine visual and tactile examinations in all patients, but particularly in those who use tobacco or who consume alcohol heavily. Additional research regarding oral cancer screening and the use of adjuncts is needed.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Evidence-Based Dentistry , Mass Screening , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cytodiagnosis/instrumentation , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Mass Screening/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Review Literature as Topic , Risk Factors
12.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 140(10): 1266-74, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19797557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral and dental diseases may be associated with other chronic diseases. METHODS: Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004, the authors calculated the prevalence of untreated dental diseases, self-reported poor oral health and the number of missing teeth for adults in the United States who had certain chronic diseases. The authors used multivariate analysis to determine whether these diseases were associated with indicators of dental disease after controlling for common risk factors. RESULTS: Participants with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes or a liver condition were twice as likely to have an urgent need for dental treatment as were participants who did not have these diseases. After controlling for common risk factors, the authors found that arthritis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, emphysema, hepatitis C virus, obesity and stroke still were associated with dental disease. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a high burden of unmet dental care needs among participants with chronic diseases. This association held in the multivariate analysis, suggesting that some chronic diseases may increase the risk of developing dental disease, decrease utilization of dental care or both. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dental and medical care providers should work together to ensure that adults with chronic diseases receive regular dental care.


Subject(s)
Dental Care for Chronically Ill/statistics & numerical data , Dental Caries/complications , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Periodontal Diseases/complications , Adult , Aged , Arthritis/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , DMF Index , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Emphysema/complications , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hepatitis C/complications , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Periodontal Diseases/epidemiology , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Stroke/complications , Tooth Loss/complications , Tooth Loss/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 140(9): 1092-9, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19723941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although rates of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States have decreased in recent years, disparities in TB incidence still exist between U.S.-born and foreign-born people (people living in the United States but born outside it) and between white people and nonwhite people. In addition, the number of TB outbreaks among health care personnel and patients has decreased since the implementation of the 1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines to prevent transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this article, the authors provide updates on the epidemiology of TB, advances in TB diagnostic methods and TB infection control guidelines for dental settings. RESULTS: In 2008, 83 percent of all reported TB cases in the United States occurred in nonwhite people and 17 percent occurred in white people. Foreign-born people had a TB rate about 10 times higher than that of U.S.-born people. New blood assays for M. tuberculosis have been developed to diagnose TB infection and disease. Changes from the 1994 CDC guidelines incorporated into CDC's "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005" include revised risk classifications, new TB diagnostic methods, decreased frequencies of tuberculin skin testing in various settings and changes in terminology. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Although the principles of TB infection control have remained the same, the changing epidemiology of TB and the advent of new diagnostic methods for TB led to the development of the 2005 update to the 1994 guidelines. Dental health care personnel should be aware of the modifications that are pertinent to dental settings and incorporate them into their overall infection control programs.


Subject(s)
Infection Control, Dental , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Global Health , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Interferon-gamma/blood , Masks , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/physiology , Occupational Exposure , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Sterilization/methods , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology
14.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 138(2): 169-78; quiz 247-8, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17272371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that health care personnel (HCP) adopt safer work practices and consider using medical devices with safety features. This article describes the circumstances of percutaneous injuries among a sample of hospital-based dental HCP and estimates the preventability of a subset of these injuries: needlesticks. METHODS: The authors analyzed percutaneous injuries reported by dental HCP in the CDC's National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers (NaSH) from December 1995 through August 2004 to describe the circumstances. RESULTS: Of 360 percutaneous injuries, 36 percent were reported by dentists, 34 percent by oral surgeons, 22 percent by dental assistants, and 4 percent each by hygienists and students. Almost 25 percent involved anesthetic syringe needles. Of 87 needlestick injuries, 53 percent occurred after needle use and during activities in which a safety feature could have been activated (such as during passing and handling) or a safer work practice used. CONCLUSIONS: NaSH data show that needlestick injuries still occur and that a majority occur at a point in the workflow at which safety syringes--in addition to safe work practices and recapping systems--could contribute to injury prevention. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: All dental practices should have a comprehensive written program for preventing needlestick injuries that describes procedures for identifying, screening and, when appropriate, adopting safety devices; mechanisms for reporting and providing medical follow-up for percutaneous injuries; and a system for training staff members in safe work practices and the proper use of safety devices.


Subject(s)
Dental Staff, Hospital , Infection Control, Dental/methods , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Dental Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Needlestick Injuries/etiology , Population Surveillance , Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Syringes/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
15.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 25(7): 570-5, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15301029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate infection control knowledge and practices, provide training on universal-standard precautions (USP), and improve infection control knowledge and practices among dentists. SETTING: Private and public dental offices in Vâlcea, Romania. METHODS: Information about the use of hepatitis B vaccine, knowledge of and training in USP, perceived risks of disease transmission, and infection control practices was gathered from a sample of dentists through interviews, direct observations, and a survey administered during a training session. RESULTS: Interviews among dentists and direct observations of infection control practices revealed that resources were often scarce in public clinics; however, availability of supplies in private or public clinics often did not correlate with adherence to proper infection control. Of 125 registered dentists, 46 (37%) attended the session and completed the survey. Of these, 75% worked in public clinics, 40% in private practices, and a few in both. More than 50% believed that the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) was low in their patients compared with the Romanian population. Only 26% of dentists had received hepatitis B vaccine. Dentists reported a mean of six percutaneous injuries a year. Most (89%) reported that gloves were effective in preventing HBV transmission; 24% wore them for every patient. Most used dry heat sterilization; however, chemical disinfectants were also used. CONCLUSIONS: Resources were limited, receipt of hepatitis vaccine was low, and infection control knowledge and practices varied. Training and education are needed regarding the importance of USP, hepatitis B vaccination, and alternative practices when resources are insufficient.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Dentistry/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Surveys , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Romania/epidemiology , Sterilization/methods , Sterilization/statistics & numerical data , Universal Precautions/statistics & numerical data
16.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ; 17(6): 865-70, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15270404

ABSTRACT

We analyzed glycemic control and insulin usage patterns of 14 preschoolers and 14 adolescents on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) matched for sex to determine how CSII therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) differs in preschoolers as compared to adolescents. Average hemoglobin A(1c) was lower in the adolescents. The percent of insulin delivered as the basal rate was the same in both groups; however, during the hours after midnight the preschoolers needed a much lower basal rate per kg body weight. There were also significant differences in insulin sensitivity and insulin/carbohydrate ratios. The number of basal rates, number of boluses, and percent of insulin administered as the basal rate were not different between groups. This is the first report of discrete differences in insulin usage patterns for preschoolers and adolescents on insulin pumps. Reasons for these dissimilarities include differences in hormone production, insulin absorption, frequency of food intake, and glycemic targets. Recognizing these variations is essential for safe and efficacious use of CSII in preschoolers with DM1.


Subject(s)
Aging , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Circadian Rhythm , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Insulin Resistance , Male
17.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 135(1): 33-47, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14959873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC, is the lead federal agency for disease prevention in the United States. It has been 10 years since CDC infection control guidelines for dental health care settings were last published. During those 10 years, new technologies and issues have emerged, and other CDC infection control guidelines for health care settings have been updated. RESULTS: In light of these developments, CDC collaborated with experts in infection control to revise its infection control recommendations for dental health care settings. Existing guidelines and published research pertinent to dental infection control principles and practices were reviewed. This article provides background information, describes the process used to create these guidelines, and lists the new recommendations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CDC believes that dental offices that follow these new recommendations will strengthen an already admirable record of safe dental practice. Patients and providers alike can be assured that oral health care can be delivered and received in a safe manner.


Subject(s)
Infection Control, Dental/methods , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Dental Equipment/microbiology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure , Protective Devices , Sterilization , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration , Water Microbiology , Water Supply
18.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 52(RR-17): 1-61, 2003 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14685139

ABSTRACT

This report consolidates previous recommendations and adds new ones for infection control in dental settings. Recommendations are provided regarding 1) educating and protecting dental health-care personnel; 2) preventing transmission of bloodborne pathogens; 3) hand hygiene; 4) personal protective equipment; 5) contact dermatitis and latex hypersensitivity; 6) sterilization and disinfection of patient-care items; 7) environmental infection control; 8) dental unit waterlines, biofilm, and water quality; and 9) special considerations (e.g., dental handpieces and other devices, radiology, parenteral medications, oral surgical procedures, and dental laboratories). These recommendations were developed in collaboration with and after review by authorities on infection control from CDC and other public agencies, academia, and private and professional organizations.


Subject(s)
Dentistry/standards , Infection Control/standards , Oral Health/standards , Humans
19.
Dent Clin North Am ; 47(4): 681-96, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14664459

ABSTRACT

Current data indicate that the risk for transmitting bloodborne pathogens in dental health care settings is low. Pre-exposure hepatitis B vaccination and the use of standard precautions to prevent exposure to blood are the most effective strategies for preventing DHCP from occupational infection with HIV, HBV or HCV. Each dental health care facility should develop a comprehensive written program for preventing and managing occupational exposures to blood that: (1) describes the types of blood exposures that may place DHCP at risk for infection; (2) outlines procedures for promptly reporting and evaluating such exposures; and (3) identifies a health care professional who is qualified to provide counseling and perform all medical evaluations and procedures in accordance with the most current USPHS recommendations. Finally, resources should be available that permit rapid access to clinical care, testing, counseling, and PEP for exposed DHCP and the testing and counseling of source patients.


Subject(s)
Dental Auxiliaries , Dentists , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Cross Infection/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Risk Factors
20.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 133(12): 1619-26, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12512659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study on the use of postexposure prophylaxis, or PEP, for exposure to human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV, among dental health care personnel, or DHCP, enrolled in a surveillance system established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC. They also discuss updated U.S. Public Health Service, or USPHS, recommendations for managing occupational exposures to HIV, as well as considerations for dentistry. METHODS: The authors analyzed occupational exposures reported by DHCP to the CDC to describe characteristics of the exposure (for example, type and severity), the source patient's HIV status and use of PEP. RESULTS: From June 1995 through August 2001, DHCP reported 208 exposures--199 percutaneous injuries, six mucous membrane exposures and three skin exposures--to the CDC. One-third of these percutaneous injuries were caused by small-bore hollow syringe needles, and most (66 percent) were moderate in depth. Nearly half the devices involved (46 percent) were visibly bloody at the time of injury. Per the criteria described in USPHS guidelines, one-half of the injuries were categorized as "less severe." Twenty-four (13 percent) known source patients were HIV-positive; 14 had symptomatic HIV infection or a high viral load. In this study, three in four DHCP exposed to an HIV-positive source warranted a three-drug PEP regimen. Twenty-nine (24 percent) DHCP exposed to a source patient who subsequently was found to be HIV-negative took PEP; six took PEP for five to 29 days. No exposures resulted in HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study are consistent with earlier reports indicating that the risk of HIV transmission in dental settings is low. Strategies such as rapid HIV testing of source patients and follow-up counseling may reduce unnecessary use of PEP. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dental practices should develop comprehensive, written programs for preventing and managing occupational exposures to blood.


Subject(s)
Dental Auxiliaries , Dentists , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Equipment Contamination , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Seronegativity , HIV Seropositivity/classification , HIV Seropositivity/epidemiology , Humans , Needlestick Injuries/classification , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/classification , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Statistics as Topic , United States/epidemiology , United States Public Health Service , Viral Load
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...