How long is too long: A retrospective study evaluating the impact of the duration of noninvasive oxygenation support strategies (high flow nasal cannula & BiPAP) on mortality in invasive mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We investigated the association of noninvasive oxygenation support [high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and BiPAP], timing of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and inpatient mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: Retrospective chart review study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (ICD-10 code U07.1) and received IMV from March 2020-October 2021. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was calculated; Obesity defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2; morbid obesity was BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. Clinical parameters/vital signs recorded at time of admission. RESULTS: 709 COVID-19 patients underwent IMV, predominantly admitted from March-May 2020 (45%), average age 62±15 years, 67% male, 37% Hispanic, and 9% from group living settings. 44% had obesity, 11% had morbid obesity, 55% had type II diabetes, 75% had hypertension, and average CCI was 3.65 (SD = 3.11). Crude mortality rate was 56%. Close linear association of age with inpatient-mortality risk was found [OR (95% CI) = 1.35 (1.27-1.44) per 5 years, p<0.0001)]. Patients who died after IMV received noninvasive oxygenation support significantly longer: 5.3 (8.0) vs. 2.7 (SD 4.6) days; longer use was also independently associated with a higher risk of inpatient-mortality: OR = 3.1 (1.8-5.4) for 3-7 days, 7.2 (3.8-13.7) for ≥8 days (reference: 1-2 days) (p<0.0001). The association magnitude varied between age groups: 3-7 days duration (ref: 1-2 days), OR = 4.8 (1.9-12.1) in ≥65 years old vs. 2.1 (1.0-4.6) in <65 years old. Higher mortality risk was associated with higher CCI in patients ≥65 (P = 0.0082); among younger patients, obesity (OR = 1.8 (1.0-3.2) or morbid obesity (OR = 2.8;1.4-5.9) (p<0.05) were associated. No mortality association was found for sex or race. CONCLUSION: Time spent on noninvasive oxygenation support [as defined by high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and BiPAP] prior to IMV increased mortality risk. Research for the generalizability of our findings to other respiratory failure patient populations is needed.

Preclosure technique versus arterial cutdown after percutaneous cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Arteriotomy repair through the preclosure technique during elective arterial access procedures is well documented. Outcomes associated with application of this technique to the removal of arterial access cannulas in patients undergoing urgent venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have not previously been reported. METHODS: We reviewed the records of consecutive patients who required VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock. Patients were compared by use of the preclosure device (Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure System; Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Ill) at time of VA-ECMO cannulation. The rate of limb complications (composite of limb ischemia, infection, and site necrosis) and secondary end points of bleeding events, pseudoaneurysm, distal part embolization, and intensive care unit length of stay after decannulation were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Ninety-nine consecutive patients managed with VA-ECMO were identified and the preclosure device was utilized in 51 of these patients. Preclosure device failure occurred in 5 instances (9.8%) and was successfully managed with surgical repair in 4 cases and endovascular intervention in another. Use of the preclosure device was associated with both fewer limb complications (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.78) and bleeding events (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.89). Pseudoaneurysm (n = 0) and distal part embolization (n = 1) were infrequently encountered in the cohort and no difference in intensive care unit length of stay after decannulation was noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, use of the preclosure technique in weaning from VA-ECMO was technically feasible, safe, and associated with an approximate 80% lower likelihood of limb complications and bleeding events compared with surgical removal.