Pediatrician Explanations of Pediatric Pain in Clinical Settings: A Delicate Craft.

Explaining chronic pain to children and families can be challenging, particularly in the absence of an obvious physiologically identifiable cause for the child's pain. In addition to medical intervention, children and families may expect clinicians to provide clarity around the cause of pain. Such explanations are often provided by clinicians who have not received formal pain training. This qualitative study sought to explore the following question: What do pediatricians consider to be important when providing pain explanations to children and their parents? Using semistructured interview methods, 16 UK pediatricians were interviewed regarding their perceptions of explaining chronic pain to children and families in clinical settings. Data were analyzed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Analyses generated 3 themes: 1) timing of the explanation, 2) casting a wider net, and 3) tailoring of the narrative. Study findings demonstrated the need for pediatricians to skilfully interpret where children and families are in their pain journey and deliver an appropriate and adaptable explanation relating to individual needs. Analyses identified the importance of providing a pain explanation that could be repeated and understood by others outside the consultation room, to enable children and families to accept the explanation. PERSPECTIVE: Study findings identify the importance of language in addition to familial and broader factors that may influence the provision and adoption of chronic pain explanations provided by pediatricians to children and families. Improving pain explanation provision may influence treatment engagement for children and their parents, subsequently impacting pain related outcomes.

'Drawing a line in the sand': Physician diagnostic uncertainty in paediatric chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic uncertainty is the subjective perception of an inability to provide an accurate explanation of the patient's health problem or that a label is missing or incorrect. While recently explored in youth with chronic pain and families, this is the first study to investigate diagnostic uncertainty from the perspectives of physicians. METHODS: Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 paediatricians who assess and/or treat youth who experience complex chronic pain. Interviews explored paediatricians' perceptions, beliefs and confidence regarding the assessment and management of chronic pain in youth and how they manage uncertainty regarding the diagnosis. Interviews were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Analyses generated one prominent theme: 'drawing a line in the sand'. Within this theme, physicians discussed uncertainty as inherent to their role treating youth with chronic pain. The metaphor of 'drawing a line in the sand' was used to describe a process of identifying a point at which physicians no longer sought a new diagnosis for the child's pain or continued diagnostic investigations. This line was influenced by numerous factors, which are highlighted through four subthemes: physician training, experience and mentorship; individual patient and family factors; perceived reassurance of diagnostic investigations; and the broader social context and implications. CONCLUSIONS: How physicians manage diagnostic uncertainty must be understood, as it is likely to critically impact how a diagnosis of chronic pain is communicated, the diagnostic investigations undertaken, the wait time to receiving a diagnosis, and ultimately youths' pain experiences.

Pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in children: an overview of systematic reviews.

We know little about the safety or efficacy of pharmacological medicines for children and adolescents with chronic pain, despite their common use. Our aim was to conduct an overview review of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions that purport to reduce pain in children with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) or chronic cancer-related pain (CCRP). We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, EMBASE, and DARE for systematic reviews from inception to March 2018. We conducted reference and citation searches of included reviews. We included children (0-18 years of age) with CNCP or CCRP. We extracted the review characteristics and primary outcomes of ≥30% participant-reported pain relief and patient global impression of change. We sifted 704 abstracts and included 23 systematic reviews investigating children with CNCP or CCRP. Seven of those 23 reviews included 6 trials that involved children with CNCP. There were no randomised controlled trials in reviews relating to reducing pain in CCRP. We were unable to combine data in a meta-analysis. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low, and we have very little confidence in the effect estimates. The state of evidence of randomized controlled trials in this field is poor; we have no evidence from randomised controlled trials for pharmacological interventions in children with cancer-related pain, yet cannot deny individual children access to potential pain relief. Prospero ID: CRD42018086900.

Adolescent chronic pain and disability: A review of the current evidence in assessment and treatment.

Adolescents who suffer from chronic pain also report complex syndrome-associated disability and distress that can detrimentally affect the quality of their lives and the lives of their family members. Over the past 10 years, there have been significant developments in both methods of assessment and in treatment programs. There have also been good developments in clinical assessment tools, although many need further study. However, the evidence base of available treatments remains small, and there is an urgent need for new trials in both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. The greatest challenges are organizational, and the concern is how to bring patients in contact with available treatments. Many patients who could benefit from evidence-supported treatments are not currently able to access treatment. Theoretical developments aimed at explaining chronic pain within the context of the family, as well as family attempts at coping with complex disability, are underway.