ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to explore factors that helped when a child with cancer transitioned to end of life care in a hospital setting. DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory design using reflexive thematic analysis. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 7 sets of bereaved parents and 10 health professionals from one specialist paediatric oncology centre. Results were shared with professionals to help shape services in a new children's hospital. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: 'change and facing the unknown', 'the comfort of feeling normal' and 'knowing and being known'. Bereaved parents described a gradual awareness of the deterioration of their child's condition and the need for trust in health professionals. Professionals described the process as challenging but were guided by the needs of children and parents. Supportive and trusting relationships with professionals helped parents to cope with the transition. CONCLUSION: We identified practices that helped create a culture that supported parents and professionals involved in caring for children facing death from cancer. These were rooted in feeling supported and working to provide the best end of life care for children. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Given that the death of a child is a uniquely challenging event, this study indicates that the clinical setting can assist via the promotion of familiarity (supporting families over time) and normality (allowing family-focused activities). These were helpful to parents and to professionals. However, professionals need emotional support when working with these families. REPORTING METHOD: The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The project steering group included one bereaved parent (who was not involved in the study), one consultant paediatric oncologist and one hospital chaplain.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In the United Kingdom, fractures of the cervical dens process in older and/or frail patients are usually managed nonsurgically in a hard collar. However, hard collars can lead to complications and this management approach is now being questioned, with growing interest in maximising patients' short-term quality-of-life. It is vital that patients' perspectives are considered; yet, there is a dearth of literature examining the aspect. To help inform wider decision-making about use of collar/no collar management of dens fractures in older/frail people, we explored older/frail people's experience of the two management approaches and how they affected their perceived quality-of-life. METHODS: We interviewed older and/or frail adults with a recent dens fracture (aged ≥65 years or with a clinical frailty score of ≥5) or their caregiver. Participants were recruited from both arms of a clinical trial comparing management using a hard collar for 12 weeks (SM) with early removal of the collar (ERC) and were interviewed following randomisation and again, 12-16 weeks later. Data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Both participant groups (SM/ERC) reported substantial, negative quality-of-life (QoL) experiences, with the fall itself and lack of access to care services and information being frequent major contributory factors. Many negative experiences cut across both participant groups, including pain, fatigue, diminished autonomy and reduced involvement in personally meaningful activities. However, we identified some subtle, yet discernible, ways in which using SM/ERC reinforced or alleviated (negative) QoL impacts, with the perceived benefits/burdens to using SM/ERC varying between different individuals. CONCLUSION: Study findings can be used to support informed decision-making about SM/ERC management of dens fractures in older/frail patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Public and patient involvement contributors were involved in the study design, development of interview topic guides and interpretation of study findings.
Subject(s)
Frail Elderly , Spinal Fractures , Adult , Aged , Humans , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Quality of Life , Pain , Research DesignABSTRACT
Introduction: Recent high-profile calls have emphasized that women's experiences should be considered in maternity care provisioning. We explored women's experiences of using closed-loop during type 1 diabetes (T1D) pregnancy to inform decision-making about antenatal rollout and guidance and support given to future users. Methods: We interviewed 23 closed-loop participants in the Automated insulin Delivery Among Pregnant women with T1D (AiDAPT) trial after randomization to closed-loop and â¼20 weeks later. Data were analyzed thematically. Results: Women described how closed-loop lessened the physical and mental demands of diabetes management, enabling them to feel more normal and sleep better. By virtue of spending increased time-in-range, women also worried less about risks to their baby and being judged negatively by health care professionals. Most noted that intensive input and support during early pregnancy had been crucial to adjusting to, and developing confidence in, the technology. Women emphasized that attaining pregnancy glucose targets still required ongoing effort from themselves and the health care team. Women described needing education to help them determine when, and how, to intervene and when to allow the closed-loop to operate without interference. All women reported more enjoyable pregnancy experiences as a result of using closed-loop; some also noted being able to remain longer in paid employment. Conclusions: Study findings endorse closed-loop use in T1D pregnancy by highlighting how the technology can facilitate positive pregnancy experiences. To realize fully the benefits of closed-loop, pregnant women would benefit from initial intensive oversight and support together with closed-loop specific education and training. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04938557.
