Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Invest ; 119(12): 3723-38, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19907079

ABSTRACT

The respiratory tract is continuously exposed to both innocuous airborne antigens and immunostimulatory molecules of microbial origin, such as LPS. At low concentrations, airborne LPS can induce a lung DC-driven Th2 cell response to harmless inhaled antigens, thereby promoting allergic asthma. However, only a small fraction of people exposed to environmental LPS develop allergic asthma. What prevents most people from mounting a lung DC-driven Th2 response upon exposure to LPS is not understood. Here we have shown that lung interstitial macrophages (IMs), a cell population with no previously described in vivo function, prevent induction of a Th2 response in mice challenged with LPS and an experimental harmless airborne antigen. IMs, but not alveolar macrophages, were found to produce high levels of IL-10 and to inhibit LPS-induced maturation and migration of DCs loaded with the experimental harmless airborne antigen in an IL-10-dependent manner. We further demonstrated that specific in vivo elimination of IMs led to overt asthmatic reactions to innocuous airborne antigens inhaled with low doses of LPS. This study has revealed a crucial role for IMs in maintaining immune homeostasis in the respiratory tract and provides an explanation for the paradox that although airborne LPS has the ability to promote the induction of Th2 responses by lung DCs, it does not provoke airway allergy under normal conditions.


Subject(s)
Asthma/prevention & control , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Lung/cytology , Lung/immunology , Macrophages/immunology , Adaptive Immunity , Allergens/toxicity , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Asthma/etiology , Asthma/immunology , Asthma/pathology , Cell Differentiation , Cell Movement , Immunity, Innate , Interleukin-10/biosynthesis , Interleukin-10/deficiency , Interleukin-10/genetics , Lipopolysaccharides/immunology , Lipopolysaccharides/toxicity , Macrophages, Alveolar/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Transgenic , Molecular Sequence Data , Ovalbumin/genetics , Ovalbumin/immunology , Peptide Fragments/genetics , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Th2 Cells/immunology , Toll-Like Receptor 4/deficiency , Toll-Like Receptor 4/genetics
2.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 127(3-4): 197-202, 2009 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19027176

ABSTRACT

Microarrays have become an important research tool for life science researchers. Expression microarrays are capable of profiling the gene expression pattern of tens of thousands of genes in a single experiment. It appears to be the platform of choice for parallel gene expression profiling. Various equine-specific gene expression microarrays have been generated and used. However, homologous microarrays are not yet commercially available for the horse. An alternative is the use of heterologous microarrays, mainly microarrays specific for mice or humans. Although the use of microarrays in equine research is still in its infancy, gene expression microarrays have shown their potential in equine research. This review presents the previous, current and potential use of expression microarrays in equine research.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling/veterinary , Gene Expression Regulation/physiology , Horses/genetics , Horses/metabolism , Protein Array Analysis/veterinary , Animals
3.
Vet J ; 177(2): 216-21, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17574458

ABSTRACT

Environmental causes of heaves are well described, but the molecular mechanisms of the disease remain unclear. Previous studies have highlighted the implications of variations in gene expression, most using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This well-known technique limits the number of genes that can be studied in a single assay. Microarray appears to be a valuable tool to by-pass this limitation, but so far there has been no equine-specific microarray available on the market. The present study was performed to determine whether a human microarray could be used to study gene expression in nucleated cells originating from peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in heaves-affected horses. With a four-fold cut-off, a total of 46 candidates were identified with differentially regulated genes between heaves-affected horses and controls. A real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT-QPCR) conducted on a selection of genes, determined on the basis of previous publications, was used to validate the microarray results. The microarray failed to detect the presence of interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-8 mRNA in the nucleated cells from BALF otherwise confirmed by real-time RT-QPCR. Although some candidate genes have been identified using this method, a complete expression profile of genes related to heaves could not be obtained with the use of the human microarray.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling , Horse Diseases/metabolism , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/veterinary , Protein Array Analysis/methods , Animals , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/cytology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Horses , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/metabolism , Male , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary
4.
Genet Sel Evol ; 39(6): 621-31, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18053572

ABSTRACT

Microarray analyses have become an important tool in animal genomics. While their use is becoming widespread, there is still a lot of ongoing research regarding the analysis of microarray data. In the context of a European Network of Excellence, 31 researchers representing 14 research groups from 10 countries performed and discussed the statistical analyses of real and simulated 2-colour microarray data that were distributed among participants. The real data consisted of 48 microarrays from a disease challenge experiment in dairy cattle, while the simulated data consisted of 10 microarrays from a direct comparison of two treatments (dye-balanced). While there was broader agreement with regards to methods of microarray normalisation and significance testing, there were major differences with regards to quality control. The quality control approaches varied from none, through using statistical weights, to omitting a large number of spots or omitting entire slides. Surprisingly, these very different approaches gave quite similar results when applied to the simulated data, although not all participating groups analysed both real and simulated data. The workshop was very successful in facilitating interaction between scientists with a diverse background but a common interest in microarray analyses.


Subject(s)
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Animals, Domestic/genetics , Cattle , Computer Simulation , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Escherichia coli Infections/genetics , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Europe , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/standards , Gene Expression Profiling/statistics & numerical data , Host-Pathogen Interactions/genetics , Mastitis, Bovine/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/standards , Quality Control , Staphylococcal Infections/genetics , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary
5.
Genet Sel Evol ; 39(6): 651-68, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18053574

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper was to describe, and when possible compare, the multivariate methods used by the participants in the EADGENE WP1.4 workshop. The first approach was for class discovery and class prediction using evidence from the data at hand. Several teams used hierarchical clustering (HC) or principal component analysis (PCA) to identify groups of differentially expressed genes with a similar expression pattern over time points and infective agent (E. coli or S. aureus). The main result from these analyses was that HC and PCA were able to separate tissue samples taken at 24 h following E. coli infection from the other samples. The second approach identified groups of differentially co-expressed genes, by identifying clusters of genes highly correlated when animals were infected with E. coli but not correlated more than expected by chance when the infective pathogen was S. aureus. The third approach looked at differential expression of predefined gene sets. Gene sets were defined based on information retrieved from biological databases such as Gene Ontology. Based on these annotation sources the teams used either the GlobalTest or the Fisher exact test to identify differentially expressed gene sets. The main result from these analyses was that gene sets involved in immune defence responses were differentially expressed.


Subject(s)
Databases, Genetic , Gene Expression Profiling/statistics & numerical data , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Animals, Domestic/genetics , Cattle/genetics , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Escherichia coli Infections/genetics , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Europe , Female , Host-Pathogen Interactions/genetics , Mastitis, Bovine/genetics , Multivariate Analysis , Staphylococcal Infections/genetics , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary
6.
Genet Sel Evol ; 39(6): 633-50, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18053573

ABSTRACT

A large variety of methods has been proposed in the literature for microarray data analysis. The aim of this paper was to present techniques used by the EADGENE (European Animal Disease Genomics Network of Excellence) WP1.4 participants for data quality control, normalisation and statistical methods for the detection of differentially expressed genes in order to provide some more general data analysis guidelines. All the workshop participants were given a real data set obtained in an EADGENE funded microarray study looking at the gene expression changes following artificial infection with two different mastitis causing bacteria: Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. It was reassuring to see that most of the teams found the same main biological results. In fact, most of the differentially expressed genes were found for infection by E. coli between uninfected and 24 h challenged udder quarters. Very little transcriptional variation was observed for the bacteria S. aureus. Lists of differentially expressed genes found by the different research teams were, however, quite dependent on the method used, especially concerning the data quality control step. These analyses also emphasised a biological problem of cross-talk between infected and uninfected quarters which will have to be dealt with for further microarray studies.


Subject(s)
Databases, Genetic , Gene Expression Profiling/statistics & numerical data , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Animals, Domestic/genetics , Bias , Cattle/genetics , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Escherichia coli Infections/genetics , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Europe , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Mastitis, Bovine/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/standards , Quality Control , Software , Staphylococcal Infections/genetics , Staphylococcal Infections/veterinary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...