ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The intensity of exposure to index cases of tuberculosis [TB] may increase the risk of TB in their contacts. The aim was to determine TB risk factors among contacts of TB index cases. METHODS: A cohort study was carried out in the contacts of pulmonary TB cases registered by the epidemiological surveillance network from 01/01/2019 to 06/30/2021. The factors associated with the risk of TB in contacts were determined using the adjusted odds ratio [aOR] and its 95% confidence interval [CI]. RESULTS: From 847 TB cases, 7087 contacts were identified. The prevalence of TB was 2.0% [145/7087] and was higher in < 5 years compared to those ≥ 65 years [4.4% versus 1.2%; p < 0.001], in those exposed ≥ 6 h daily [4%], and < 6 h daily [1.6%] with respect to weekly exposure of < 6 h [0.7%; p < 0.001]. Those contacts exposed ≥ 6 h daily [aOR= 6.9; 95%CI:2.1-22.1], < 5 years [aOR= 8.3; 95%CI:1.8-37.8] and immigrants [aOR= 1.7; 95%CI:1.1-2.7] had a higher risk of TB. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of TB increases with the time of exposure to the index case and this risk is also higher in < 5 years and immigrants. Contact tracing has a high yield for detecting new cases of TB.
Subject(s)
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Tuberculosis , Humans , Cohort Studies , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Contact Tracing/methods , PrevalenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic could have negative effects on tuberculosis (TB) control. The objective was to assess the impact of the pandemic in contact tracing, TB and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in contacts of patients with pulmonary TB in Catalonia (Spain). METHODS: Contact tracing was carried out in cases of pulmonary TB detected during 14 months in the pre-pandemic period (1 January 2019 to 28 February 2020) and 14 months in the pandemic period (1 March 2020 to 30 April 2021). Contacts received the tuberculin skin test and/or interferon gamma release assay and it was determined whether they had TB or LTBI. Variables associated with TB or LTBI in contacts (study period and sociodemographic variables) were analyzed using adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: The pre-pandemic and pandemic periods showed, respectively: 503 and 255 pulmonary TB reported cases (reduction of 50.7%); and 4676 and 1687 contacts studied (reduction of 36.1%). In these periods, the proportion of TB cases among the contacts was 1.9% (84/4307) and 2.2% (30/1381) (P = 0.608); and the proportion of LTBI was 25.3% (1090/4307) and 29.2% (403/1381) (P < 0.001). The pandemic period was associated to higher LTBI proportion (aOR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5), taking into account the effect on LTBI of the other variables studied as sex, age, household contact and migrant status. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is affecting TB control due to less exhaustive TB and LTBI case detection. An increase in LTBI was observed during the pandemic period. Efforts should be made to improve detection of TB and LTBI among contacts of TB cases.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Latent Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Tuberculosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Contact Tracing , Humans , Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Pandemics , Tuberculin Test , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of rifampin for 4 months and isoniazid for 6 months in contacts with latent tuberculosis infection. METHODS: The cost was the sum of the cost of treatment with isoniazid for 6 months or with rifampin for 4 months of all contacts plus the cost of treatment of cases of tuberculosis not avoided. The effectiveness was the number of cases of tuberculosis avoided with isoniazid for 6 months or with rifampin for 4 months. When the cost with one schedule was found to be cheaper than the other and a greater number of tuberculosis cases were avoided, this schedule was considered dominant. The efficacy adopted was 90% for rifampin for 4 months and 69% for isoniazid for 6 months. A sensitivity analysis was made for efficacies of rifampin for 4 months of 80%, 69%, 60% and 50%. RESULTS: Of the 1002 patients studied, 863 were treated with isoniazid for 6 months and 139 with rifampin for 4 months The cost-effectiveness ratio with isoniazid for 6 month was 19759.48/avoided case of tuberculosis and 8736.86/avoided case of tuberculosis with rifampin for 4 months. Rifampin for 4 months was dominant. In the sensitivity analysis, rifampin for 4 months was dominant for efficacies from 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Rifampin for 4 months was more cost-effective than isoniazid for 6 months.
