Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Rec ; 173(17): 422, 2013 Nov 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24097819

ABSTRACT

Four models are presented investigating risks present on Great Britain (GB) turkey farms in breeding and fattening flocks for ciprofloxacin and cephalosporin resistance. Risk factors for ciprofloxacin resistance in fattening flocks were sourcing of feed from national compounders, antimicrobial use in the flock and evidence of mice. Disinfection of floors and walls at depopulation, older flocks and division of the flock with partitions reduced the risk. In breeding farms holding over 10,000 birds, administration of fluoroquinolones within the last year and horses on the neighbouring farm all increased the risk, whereas replenishing foot dips more than once a week reduced the risk. For cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli on fattening farms, being an independent farm, having a watercourse near the poultry houses, dividing the flock with partitions and providing staff with gloves reduced the risk. Factors that increased the risk included if staff worked with other livestock and if there were pigs on neighbouring farms. This work suggests that good hygiene and biosecurity, rodent control and responsible use of antimicrobials on turkey farms might help minimise the prevalence of fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin resistance in E coli, and restrict the spread of resistance genes to other organisms.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Turkeys , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Models, Statistical , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
2.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 60(4): 296-303, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22856515

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at gaining information on the presence of Salmonella in UK turkey hatcheries and possible epidemiological links between breeding farms, hatcheries and finishing farms. The presence of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli in hatchery samples, as well as in faecal samples from farms, and trends in occurrence of resistance were also investigated. Over a 2 year-period, four British turkey hatcheries were visited and intensively sampled for the presence of Salmonella and ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli. In two hatcheries, a link could be demonstrated between the presence of certain Salmonella serovars in the hatcheries and on breeding and finishing farms. Within the hatcheries, serovars linked to breeding farms were found more frequently in the poult processing and dispatch areas, whereas serovars identified as 'resident hatchery contaminants' were predominantly found inside the hatcher cabinets. Ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates of S. Senftenberg were identified in one hatchery, which coincided with enrofloxacin treatment of some of the breeding flocks. Ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli was found in two hatcheries, and the majority of these isolates showed multidrug resistance.


Subject(s)
Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Turkeys , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Food Microbiology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
3.
Avian Pathol ; 41(1): 83-9, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22845325

ABSTRACT

Fluoroquinolones are a widely used group of antimicrobials in both human and animal medicine, with ciprofloxacin being a critically important fluoroquinolone for serious human infections. The present study reports on a 1-year survey for the presence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli in turkeys from Great Britain. Boot swabs were taken from 442 turkey flocks comprised of 125 breeding flocks and 317 meat flocks from 337 different farms over a 1-year period (2006 to 2007). CHROMagar ECC containing 1 mg/l ciprofloxacin was used to obtain ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates. Isolates were tested for sensitivity to 16 different antimicrobials. Isolates with ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations ≥8 mg/l were tested for mutations in gyrA by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Selected isolates were tested by multiplex polymerase chain reaction for qnrA, qnrB and qnrS, qepA and aac(6')-Ib-cr genes. Conjugations were performed to assess the transferability of resistance to quinolones. Ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli was found in 22.4% of turkey breeding flocks and 60.9% of meat flocks. Two main mutations in gyrA, as well as a range of silent mutations, were identified in resistant isolates. Flocks with transferable resistance genes qnrB, qnrS, and aac(6')-Ib-cr were found at a low flock prevalence of 4.2%, 1.6% and 1.0%, respectively; however, under laboratory conditions only transfer of qnrS genes could be demonstrated. This work has confirmed the occurrence of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli strains throughout turkey breeding and meat flocks, with almost one-third of E. coli isolates being resistant to ciprofloxacin. Of those, more than 87% were also resistant to three or more antimicrobial classes.


Subject(s)
Ciprofloxacin , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/genetics , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Turkeys , Animals , DNA Gyrase/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis/veterinary , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Prevalence , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(1): 86-95, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21098542

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to determine the prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) in Escherichia coli from poultry in Great Britain (GB). METHODS: E. coli was isolated from 388 broiler chicken caecal samples from 22 abattoirs and from boot swabs from 442 turkey flocks over successive 1 year periods. CHROMagar ECC with and without cephalosporin antibiotics was used as isolation medium and the chicken study also used CHROMagar CTX. ESBL phenotype isolates were tested for the presence of bla(CTX-M,) bla(OXA), bla(SHV), bla(TEM) and ampC genes(.) CTX-M isolates were tested for O25 serogroup, replicon, CTX-M sequence, multilocus sequence type (MLST), PFGE type, plasmid transfer and qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qepA and aac(6')-Ib genes. RESULTS: CTX-M-carrying E. coli were isolated from 54.5% of the broiler abattoirs and from 3.6% of individual broiler caecal samples and were CTX-M sequence types 1 (mainly), 3 and 15 with replicon types I1-γ, A/C and P/F, and I1-γ, respectively. CTX-M-carrying E. coli were isolated from 5.2% of turkey meat production farms and 6.9% of turkey breeder farms and were CTX-M sequence types 1, 14 (mainly), 15 and 55 with mainly replicon types F, FIA, K and I1-γ, respectively. None of the CTX-M isolates was serogroup O25. PFGE/MLST showed the CTX-M isolates to be clonally diverse, although MLST 156 with CTX-M-15 was isolated from both chickens and turkeys and has been previously reported in gulls. CTX-M-negative, ESBL- and bla(TEM)-positive strains were mainly TEM-52C. CONCLUSIONS: poultry-derived CTX-M E. coli in GB are different from major CTX-M sequence types causing disease in humans.


Subject(s)
Cecum/microbiology , Chickens/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Turkeys/microbiology , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Genes, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Plasmids/analysis , Prevalence , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
J Appl Microbiol ; 105(5): 1421-31, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18778293

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To estimate the proportions of farms on which broilers, turkeys and pigs were shedding fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant Escherichia coli or Campylobacter spp. near to slaughter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Freshly voided faeces were collected on 89 poultry and 108 pig farms and cultured with media containing 1.0 mg l(-1) ciprofloxacin. Studies demonstrated the specificity of this sensitive method, and both poultry and pig sampling yielded FQ-resistant E. coli on 60% of farms. FQ-resistant Campylobacter spp. were found on around 22% of poultry and 75% of pig farms. The majority of resistant isolates of Campylobacter (89%) and E. coli (96%) tested had minimum inhibitory concentrations for ciprofloxacin of > or =8 mg l(-1). The proportion of resistant E. coli and Campylobacter organisms within samples varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: FQ resistance is commonly present among two enteric bacterial genera prevalent on pig and poultry farms, although the low proportion of resistant organisms in many cases requires a sensitive detection technique. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: FQ-resistant bacteria with zoonotic potential appear to be present on a high proportion of UK pig and poultry farms. The risk this poses to consumers relative to other causes of FQ-resistant human infections remains to be clarified.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Campylobacter/drug effects , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Campylobacter/growth & development , Campylobacter Infections/microbiology , Campylobacter Infections/veterinary , Chickens , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli Infections , Feces/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/drug therapy , Swine , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Turkeys , United Kingdom
6.
J Appl Microbiol ; 98(3): 556-63, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15715857

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine if three classes of farm disinfectants were able to select for ciprofloxacin or cyclohexane tolerant [indicative of a multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) phenotype] Escherichia coli and if cyclohexane-tolerant E. coli could be isolated from farms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Chicken slurry containing ca 1 : 99 ratio ciprofloxacin resistant : susceptible E. coli (10 different resistant strains examined) was treated for 24 h with each of the disinfectants and examined for survival of resistant : susceptible strains. Ciprofloxacin-sensitive (n=5) and -resistant (n=5) E. coli were grown with sublethal concentrations of the disinfectants and then plated to agar containing ciprofloxacin or overlaid with cyclohexane. Escherichia coli (n=389) isolated from farms were tested for cyclohexane tolerance. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined against representative isolates and mutants. The disinfectants did not select for the ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli in poultry slurry but following growth with each of the three disinfectants, higher numbers (P < or = 0.023) of cyclohexane-tolerant E. coli were isolated and these had a MAR phenotype. Of the 389 farm E. coli tested, only one was cyclohexane tolerant. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible that in a farm environment, E. coli could be exposed to similar concentrations of the disinfectants that are selected for MAR type organisms under these laboratory conditions. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Data from this study suggest that cyclohexane-resistant E. coli are not common on farms, but in view of the ease of isolating them in the laboratory with farm disinfectants, further investigations on farms are warranted.


Subject(s)
Agrochemicals/pharmacology , Cyclohexanes , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Environmental Microbiology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Chickens , Ciprofloxacin , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Humans , Manure , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
7.
J Appl Microbiol ; 94(6): 1024-9, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12752810

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To provide molecular fingerprinting evidence of the contribution of wildlife vectors in the on-farm epidemiology of Salmonella Enteritidis infections. METHODS AND RESULTS: Salmonella Enteritidis strains were isolated from wildlife and from farm environment samples collected in 10 egg layer farms. Isolates were typed using plasmid profiling, XbaI-pulsed field gel electrophoresis and PstI-SphI ribotyping. In all 10 farms we were able to identify the same S. Enteritidis clones in wildlife vectors and farm environment. On several occasions the same clones were found before and after cleansing and disinfecting the farm premises. Also in some instances the same clones were present in mice samples, egg contents and spent hens. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive molecular evidence for the involvement of several wildlife species (mice, rats, flies, litter beetles and foxes) in the maintenance of S. Enteritidis infection on farms has been presented. Failures in biosecurity seriously compromise the control of this pathogen on laying farms. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This paper reports on the use of molecular tools for the study of the epidemiology of S. Enteritidis. It gives useful information to be considered in control programmes for this organism on poultry farms.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild , Chickens , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Salmonella Infections/transmission , Salmonella enteritidis/genetics , Animals , Clone Cells , Coleoptera , Disease Vectors , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Female , Food Microbiology , Foxes , Mice , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Poultry Diseases/transmission , Rats
8.
J Appl Microbiol ; 93(5): 732-44, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12392517

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the degree of genetic diversity among animal Salmonella Dublin UK isolates, and to compare it with the genetic diversity found among human isolates from the same time period. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred isolates (50 human and 50 animal) were typed using plasmid profiling, XbaI-pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and PstI-SphI ribotyping. Antimicrobial resistance data to 16 antibiotics was presented, and the presence of class-I integrons was investigated by real-time PCR. Seven different plasmid profiles, 19 ribotypes and 21 PFGE types were detected. A combination of the three methods allowed clear differentiation of 43 clones or strains. Eighteen isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial; five of them were multi-resistant and of these, only three presented class I integrons. CONCLUSIONS: Ribotyping data suggest the existence of at least three very different clonal lines; the same distribution in well-defined groups was not evident from the PFGE data. The existence of a variety of clones in both animals and humans has been demonstrated. A few prevalent clones seem to be widely disseminated among different animal species and show a diverse geographical and temporal distribution. The same clones were found in animals and humans, which may infer that both farm and pet animals may act as potential vehicles of infection for humans. Some other clones seem to be less widely distributed. Clustering analysis of genomic fingerprints of Salmonella Dublin and Salm. Enteritidis isolates confirms the existence of a close phylogenetic relationship between both serotypes. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This paper describes the utility of a multiple genetic typing approach for Salm. Dublin. It gives useful information on clonal diversity among human and animal isolates.


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Salmonella enterica/genetics , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/classification , Birds , Cattle , Chickens , Cluster Analysis , Dogs , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Humans , Integrons/genetics , Phylogeny , Plasmids/analysis , Plasmids/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Ribotyping/methods , Salmonella enterica/classification , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification , Sheep , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...