Contrasting global, regional and local patterns of genetic structure in gray reef shark populations from the Indo-Pacific region.

Human activities have resulted in the loss of over 90% of sharks in most ocean basins and one in four species of elasmobranch are now listed at risk of extinction by the IUCN. How this collapse will affect the ability of populations to recover in the face of continued exploitation and global climate change remains unknown. Indeed, important ecological and biological information are lacking for most shark species, particularly estimates of genetic diversity and population structure over a range of spatial scales. Using 15 microsatellite markers, we investigated genetic diversity and population structure in gray reef sharks over their Indo-Pacific range (407 specimens from 9 localities). Clear genetic differentiation was observed between the Indian and the Pacific Ocean specimens (FST = 0.145***). Further differentiation within the Pacific included a West and East cleavage as well as North-Central and South-Central Pacific clusters. No genetic differentiation was detected within archipelagos. These results highlight the legacy of past climate changes and the effects of large ocean expanses and circulation patterns on contrasting levels of connectivity at global, regional and local scales. Our results indicate a need for regional conservation units for gray reef sharks and pinpoint the isolation and vulnerability of their French Polynesian population.

Convergence of marine megafauna movement patterns in coastal and open oceans.

The extent of increasing anthropogenic impacts on large marine vertebrates partly depends on the animals' movement patterns. Effective conservation requires identification of the key drivers of movement including intrinsic properties and extrinsic constraints associated with the dynamic nature of the environments the animals inhabit. However, the relative importance of intrinsic versus extrinsic factors remains elusive. We analyze a global dataset of ∼2.8 million locations from >2,600 tracked individuals across 50 marine vertebrates evolutionarily separated by millions of years and using different locomotion modes (fly, swim, walk/paddle). Strikingly, movement patterns show a remarkable convergence, being strongly conserved across species and independent of body length and mass, despite these traits ranging over 10 orders of magnitude among the species studied. This represents a fundamental difference between marine and terrestrial vertebrates not previously identified, likely linked to the reduced costs of locomotion in water. Movement patterns were primarily explained by the interaction between species-specific traits and the habitat(s) they move through, resulting in complex movement patterns when moving close to coasts compared with more predictable patterns when moving in open oceans. This distinct difference may be associated with greater complexity within coastal microhabitats, highlighting a critical role of preferred habitat in shaping marine vertebrate global movements. Efforts to develop understanding of the characteristics of vertebrate movement should consider the habitat(s) through which they move to identify how movement patterns will alter with forecasted severe ocean changes, such as reduced Arctic sea ice cover, sea level rise, and declining oxygen content.

How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.

STUDY QUESTION: How does vitrification affect oocyte viability? SUMMARY ANSWER: Vitrification does not affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Oocyte vitrification is performed routinely and successfully in IVF and oocyte donation programs. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective study performed between June 2009 and February 2012 to compare ongoing pregnancy rates and other indices of viability between fresh and vitrified oocytes. A total of 99 donations with more than 16 oocytes (MII) in which oocytes were allocated both to a synchronous recipient (fresh oocytes) and to an asynchronous recipient (vitrified oocytes) were included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The participants were consenting couples (donors and recipients) from the oocyte donation program. On the day of retrieval, the oocytes allocated to the synchronous recipient were inseminated and those allocated for banking were denuded of cumulus and vitrified. Vitrified oocytes were microinjected with spermatozoa 2 h after warming. Embryo transfer was performed on Day 2 of development in both groups, and the remaining embryos were cryopreserved on Day 3. Clinical pregnancy was defined by a positive fetal heartbeat at 6 weeks. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 989 oocytes were warmed and 85.6% survived. No significant differences were observed between fresh and vitrified oocytes: fertilization rate (80.7 versus 78.2%), ongoing embryo rate (71.0 versus 68.2%) or good-quality embryo rate (54.1 versus 49.8%). The mean number of embryos transferred was similar in both groups (1.82 ± 0.44 versus 1.90 ± 0.34). The implantation rate (33.3 versus 34.0%) and the multiple pregnancy rate (27.7 versus 20.8) were also similar between both groups (P > 0.05). The live birth rate per cycle was 38.4% in the recipients of fresh oocytes and 43.4% in the recipients of vitrified oocytes (P > 0.05). Eighty five frozen embryo transfers were also evaluated. Comparing embryos from fresh and vitrified oocytes there were no significant differences in the embryo survival rate (70.1 versus 65.8%), clinical pregnancy rate (40.8 versus 33.3%) or implantation rate (21.8 versus 26.8%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The oocytes were donated by healthy, young women (≤35 years) and these results cannot be extrapolated to other populations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Outcomes obtained with vitrified oocytes are as good as with fresh oocytes and the use of vitrification can be extended to new applications, e.g. accumulation of oocytes from successive stimulations for preimplantation genetic diagnosis, for patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or in patients needing to preserve their fertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was done under the auspices of the Càtedra d'Investigació en Obstetrícia i Ginecologia of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

A prospective trial comparing oocyte donor ovarian response and recipient pregnancy rates between suppression with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone and dual suppression with a contraceptive vaginal ring and GnRH.

BACKGROUND: Contraceptive treatment before gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist administration presents advantages in women with a tendency to hyper-response and simplifies donor-recipient treatment synchronization. This study compares response to gonadotrophin stimulation under hypophyseal suppression in oocyte donors with or without vaginal contraceptive pretreatment. METHODS: One hundred and ninety oocyte donors were recruited in a single centre and prospectively assigned to one of two treatment groups, according to the day of the week menstruation initiated: Group VC-, no prior vaginal contraceptive and Group VC+, prior vaginal contraceptive. RESULTS: VC+ patients presented a significantly higher cancellation rate, lower plasma estradiol levels and fewer follicles >12 mm on the day of hCG, versus the VC- group. Number of oocytes recovered was significantly lower in the VC+ group. All the cases of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (SOHSS) were in the VC- group. Pregnancy rates by embryo transfer to synchronic recipients were similar between VC+ and VC- (59.5 versus 57.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal contraceptive pretreatment resulted in a higher ovarian suppression, whereas SOHSS rate was lower than in donors who did not receive pretreatment. There were no differences in pregnancy rates between the two groups of synchronic oocyte recipients.

Identification and molecular cloning of two homologues of protein phosphatase X from Arabidopsis thaliana.

In a recent paper [Ariño et al., Plant Mol Biol 21: 475-485 (1993)] we reported the amplification of a DNA fragment (AP-2) from the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana encoding an amino acid sequence corresponding to a Ser/Thr protein phosphatase distantly related to type 2A protein phosphatases. In this paper we report the use of the AP-2 fragment to isolate several cDNA clones from a leaf cDNA library. Two of these (EP124 and EP129) largely overlap and contain the AP-2 sequence, whereas a third clone (EP128) is different although very related in sequence (86% of identity). Clones EP124/EP129 and EP128 were found to encode two highly related polypeptides (93% identity) of 305 residues, showing a very high identity (83%) to the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase X (PPX) from rabbit. Therefore, they have been named PPX-1 (EP124/EP129) and PPX-2 (EP128). Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA indicates that only these two genes encoding phosphatases closely related to PPX are present in the genome of A. thaliana. Both PPX-1 and PPX-2 are expressed at very low levels in A. thaliana flowers, leaves, stems and roots. The expression levels of four previously identified type 2A phosphatases are higher than those of PPX genes. PP2A-1 appears to be the major mRNA species detected in all the tissues analyzed.