Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Med Sci ; 355(4): 396-401, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29661355

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As a result of the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work hour guideline implementation, the structure of intensive care unit (ICU) teams at training institutions has been affected. The impact these changes have had on the current work environment has not been well described. METHODS: The authors conducted an online survey of internal medicine program directors in 2016. The survey investigated how training institutions structure their intensive care units in reference to volume, resident housestaff and alternative coverage options, with a focus on changes made after the implementation of the 2011 ACGME duty hour restrictions. RESULTS: Notable differences were found in program director responses to coverage of patients in the ICUs. A total of 62 of the 132 (48%) responding program directors describe coverage of all patients solely by resident housestaff. Since 2011, 54 (41%) programs have increased the number of resident physicians rotating in the ICU per month and initiated or increased the use of nonresident coverage of patients. Use of non-resident providers is not associated with a decrease in the number of total ICU months per resident or a decrease in educational value. CONCLUSIONS: Since the 2011 ACGME duty hour implementation, there is wide variability in the learning environment of medical intensive care units in training institutions.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/standards , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Workload/standards , Accreditation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Guidelines as Topic , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(36): e1285, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26356688

ABSTRACT

Pasteurella multocida, a zoonotic infectious organism, has most often been described in patients after an animal bite. Here, we characterize the clinical features and outcomes of P multocida infection in a large cohort of patients according to the presence or absence of an animal bite.We retrospectively searched MUSC's laboratory information system for all patients with positive P multocida cultures from 2000 to 2014. Extensive data were abstracted, including clinical and outcome data. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was used to assess comorbidities among patients.We identified 44 patients with P multocida infections, including 25 with an animal bite. The average age was 64 years and the majority of patients were women (N = 30). There was no difference in age and sex distribution among those with and without a bite (P = 0.38 and 0.75, respectively). A CCI ≥1 was significantly associated with the absence of a bite (P = 0.006). Patients presenting without a bite were more frequently bacteremic (37% vs 4%, respectively, P = 0.001), and were hospitalized more often (84% vs 44%, respectively, P = 0.012). Of the 8 patients who required intensive care unit (ICU)-based care, 7 were non-bite-related. There were 4 deaths, all occurring in patients not bitten.P multocida infections not associated with an animal bite were often associated with bacteremia, severe comorbidity(ies), immune-incompetent states, the need for ICU management, and were associated with substantial mortality.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Bites and Stings , Pasteurella Infections , Pasteurella multocida , Aged , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/etiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bites and Stings/complications , Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Bites and Stings/microbiology , Cats , Comorbidity , Dogs , Female , Humans , Immunocompetence , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pasteurella Infections/complications , Pasteurella Infections/diagnosis , Pasteurella Infections/drug therapy , Pasteurella Infections/epidemiology , Pasteurella Infections/immunology , Pasteurella Infections/physiopathology , Pasteurella multocida/drug effects , Pasteurella multocida/isolation & purification , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , South Carolina/epidemiology
3.
Acad Med ; 89(10): 1366-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25119553

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: Handoffs are an integral component of patient care, and the number of handoffs has increased as a result of duty hours restrictions for resident physicians. A structured handoff curriculum improves accuracy and has been shown to decrease medical errors. A standardized approach across all specialties is lacking in the published literature. The authors discuss the development and implementation of an institution-wide handoff curriculum for incoming first-year residents. APPROACH: An Innovation in Graduate Medical Education committee, including faculty from multiple specialties, identified an educational deficiency in handoffs and selected this as the target for the educational innovation. Meetings were held to develop and implement an extensive handoff curriculum for incoming first-year residents. The designed curriculum included large- and small-group sessions, and a specialty-specific observed simulated handoff experience. The authors analyzed participants' pre- and postsurveys using descriptive statistics. OUTCOMES: One hundred and twenty-four participants attended the formalized handoff training day. Following training, residents recognized that dedicated time for verbal exchange, templates for accessing and recording information, interactive handoffs giving priority to ill patients, and highlighting action items were most important for effective handoff. NEXT STEPS: Both undergraduate and graduate medical education curricula need to develop formalized training and methods to assess competencies in handoffs. Training incoming residents is a logical starting place, but programs should be systematically disseminated across all specialties, from residents to faculty, in order to be effectively integrated into the culture of an institution.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate , Internship and Residency , Patient Handoff/organization & administration , Patient Safety , Quality Improvement/standards , Academic Medical Centers , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , South Carolina
4.
Acad Med ; 87(8): 1041-5, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22722351

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A profile of the activities and responsibilities of vice chairs for education is notably absent from the medical education literature. The authors sought to determine the demographics, roles and responsibilities, and major priorities and challenges faced by vice chairs for education. METHOD: In 2010, the authors sent a confidential, Web-based survey to all 82 identified department of medicine vice chairs for education in the United States and Canada. The authors inquired about demographics, roles, expectations of and for their position, opinions on the responsibilities outlined for their position, metrics used to evaluate their success, top priorities, and job descriptions. Analysis included creating descriptive statistics and categorizing the qualitative comments. RESULTS: Fifty-nine vice chairs for education (72%) responded. At the time of appointment, only 6 (10%) were given a job description, and only 17 (28%) had a defined job description and metrics used to evaluate their success. Only 20 (33%) had any formal budget management training, and 23 (38%) controlled an education budget. Five themes emerged regarding the responsibilities and goals of the vice chair for education: oversee educational programs; possess educational expertise; promote educational scholarship; serve in leadership activities; and, disturbingly, respondents found expectations to be vague and ill defined. CONCLUSIONS: Vice chairs for education are departmental leaders. The authors' findings and recommendations can serve as a beginning for defining educational directions and resources, building consensus, and designing an appropriate educational infrastructure for departments of medicine.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Education, Medical , Faculty, Medical , Job Description , Leadership , Physician Executives , Canada , Female , Humans , Male , Organizational Objectives , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...