Comparison of novel synthetic materials with traditional methods to repair exposed abdominal wall fascial defects.

Repair of large abdominal wall defects is a challenge, particularly when full-thickness tissue loss prohibits coverage of the fascial repair. Two novel synthetic materials (TMS-1 and TMS-2) have been shown to be better accepted than expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex), and polypropylene (Marlex) in the closure of clean and contaminated fascial wounds that are immediately covered by skin/soft tissue. Therefore, 1-cm2 abdominal wall defects were created in each of the four quadrants of rat groups. Gore-Tex, Marlex, and TMS-1 or TMS-2 were used to repair three defects, the fourth being primarily closed. To ensure that each repair remained exposed, skin edges were sutured to underlying muscle. Additional animal groups underwent the same protocol; however, peritonitis was induced at surgery using a fecal inoculum technique. Animals were sacrificed 2 weeks later, at which time a blinded observer assessed the surface area and severity of adhesions. In clean wounds, the surface area of formed adhesions was less (p < .004) after primary closure than each synthetic material; among the synthetics, TMS-2 caused significantly (p < .01) less extensive adhesions than Marlex. In addition, the severity of adhesions to TMS-2 was comparable to that of defects closed primarily, and less severe (p < .02) than those formed to Gore-Tex and Marlex. In animals with peritonitis, primary closure caused less extensive (p < .03) adhesions than Marlex and Gore-Tex and significantly (p < .002) less severe adhesions than Marlex, Gore-Tex, and TMS-2. However, the severity of adhesions formed to TMS-1 repairs proved comparable to primarily closed wounds. These experiments reaffirm the tenet that, whenever possible, abdominal wounds should undergo primary fascial closure. When soft tissue coverage over the repair cannot be achieved, TMS-2 is well tolerated in clean wounds. However, the superiority of TMS-1 over the other synthetic materials in contaminated wounds suggests it may also ultimately prove to be of clinical utility.

Efficacy of a novel synthetic material to close exposed fascial defects.

BACKGROUND: After developing a synthetic composite material (TMS-1) made from a porous polypropylene mesh (placed in apposition to fascia) coated on the "visceral" side with solid polyurethane, we compared its efficacy with that of porous polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and primary fascial closure when the repairs were left exposed to the environment. METHODS: We created 1 cm2 abdominal wall defects in each of the four abdominal quadrants of rats (n = 12). We used porous polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and TMS-1 to repair three defects; the fourth we primarily closed. The skin was left open in all cases, leaving the fascial closures exposed. A second group of rats (n = 24) had the same operation, except that peritonitis was induced using a standard fecal inoculation technique. When the rats were killed 2 weeks later, a "blinded" observer using a standard scale assessed the surface area and severity of adhesions formed. RESULTS: When compared with the other synthetic materials, the surface area of adhesions formed was significantly less after primary closure in clean conditions; in contaminated conditions, it was less than porous polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and the same as TMS-1. Furthermore, in contaminated conditions, the severity of adhesions beneath TMS-1 was the same as primary closure and significantly less than those beneath the polypropylene. CONCLUSION: The overall superiority of TMS-1 over porous polytetrafluoroethylene and polypropylene in septic conditions justifies further experiments to define its long-term efficacy in the repair of large defects.

Development of a novel synthetic material to close abdominal wall defects.

To compare the efficacy of a novel synthetic material (TMS-2) with polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene (Marlex), and primary closure of experimentally fashioned clean and contaminated abdominal wounds, 1-cm2 abdominal wall defects were created in each of the four abdominal quadrants of rats (n = 10). Patches of each material were used to repair three of these defects, the fourth being primarily closed. A second group of rats (n = 7) underwent the same operative protocol; however, peritonitis was induced at the time of surgery using a fecal inoculation technique. Animals were killed 2 weeks later, and surface area and severity of formed adhesions were assessed by a "blinded" observer. All closure techniques were successful insofar as none demonstrated fascial dehiscence. Compared with each synthetic material, the surface area of formed adhesions was smaller after primary closure in clean and in contaminated conditions; however, the three synthetic materials were equally matched regarding surface area of adhesions under both conditions. In the face of fecal contamination, TMS-2 proved identical to primary closure, each generating significantly (P < 0.02) milder adhesions than the other prosthetic materials. It is concluded that the TMS-2 may prove of clinical benefit to repair abdominal wall defects.