Mutational and cysteine scanning analysis of the glucagon receptor N-terminal domain.

The glucagon receptor belongs to the B family of G-protein coupled receptors. Little structural information is available about this receptor and its association with glucagon. We used the substituted cysteine accessibility method and three-dimensional molecular modeling based on the gastrointestinal insulinotropic peptide and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor structures to study the N-terminal domain of this receptor, a central element for ligand binding and specificity. Our results showed that Asp(63), Arg(116), and Lys(98) are essential for the receptor structure and/or ligand binding because mutations of these three residues completely disrupted or markedly impaired the receptor function. In agreement with these data, our models revealed that Asp(63) and Arg(116) form a salt bridge, whereas Lys(98) is engaged in cation-π interactions with the conserved tryptophans 68 and 106. The native receptor could not be labeled by hydrophilic cysteine biotinylation reagents, but treatment of intact cells with [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate increased the glucagon binding site density. This result suggested that an unidentified protein with at least one free cysteine associated with the receptor prevented glucagon recognition and that [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate treatment relieved this inhibition. The substituted cysteine accessibility method was also performed on 15 residues selected using the three-dimensional models. Several receptor mutants, despite a relatively high predicted cysteine accessibility, could not be labeled by specific reagents. The three-dimensional models show that these mutated residues are located on one face of the protein. This could be part of the interface between the receptor and the unidentified inhibitory protein, making these residues inaccessible to biotinylation compounds.

VPAC(1) receptors have different agonist efficacy profiles on membrane and intact cells.

The vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor VPAC(1) is preferentially coupled to G(alpha s) protein but also increases [Ca(2+)](i) through interaction with G(alpha i)/G(alpha q) protein. We evaluated a panel of full, partial and null agonists for their capability to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity in both intact cells and membrane and [Ca(2+)](i) in intact cells transfected with the reporter gene aequorin. In intact cells, the agonists efficacy for cAMP and calcium increase were well, but not linearly correlated: VPAC(1) receptors activated G(alpha s) protein more efficiently but with the same pharmacological profile as the other G proteins. In contrast, there was a difference between cAMP increase in intact and broken cell membranes: EC(50) values were generally lower in intact cells whereas the efficacy was higher. There was, however, no correlation between the shift in the EC(50) value and the intrinsic activity. Of interest, the (4-28) fragment, a reported antagonist on cell membrane, was a full agonist in intact cells. We concluded that the active states of the VPAC(1) receptor resulting from the coupling to different effector are undistinguishable by the VIP analogs tested but that receptor properties are different when evaluated in intact cells or cell membranes.