Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Rheumatol ; 33(7): 989-94, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24510025

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal education in primary care has previously been shown, in 1995, to be inadequate [1]. The aims of this study were to evaluate the current musculoskeletal education and skills during vocational training for general practice and to see if progress has been made. Questionnaires were sent to General Practice Registrars, in general practice attachments in June 2004. Four UK General Practice Deaneries participated (Northern, Mersey, Yorkshire and Wessex). Questionnaires were received from 251 (44 %) registrars. Of the responders, only 77 % reported receiving specific clinical rheumatology teaching at medical school and 30 % had not received any tutorials on musculoskeletal conditions during their vocational training. Of the registrars, 16 % reported having completed a rheumatology post, and an additional 19 % had been able to attend rheumatology outpatient clinics; 70 % of the registrars had injected or aspirated the knee although less than half of these (22 %) had done this in a primary care setting. Lack of experience was associated with low confidence at knowing when to perform the injection and with performing the injection itself. A significant proportion of registrars reported being pre-dominantly self-taught for performing injections (soft tissue = 10.7 %, joint injections = 8.7 %) and for the management of shoulder pain (20.1 %). Registrars rated their overall musculoskeletal training as inadequate. Primary care musculoskeletal education remains inadequate and needs to be improved to enable registrars to be confident in managing a significant proportion of their workload. Identifying learning needs for primary care would inform future educational interventions.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical , General Practice/methods , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Primary Health Care/methods , Rheumatology/education , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Physicians , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
2.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 33(1): 47-51, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15124943

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To elicit the barriers to the effective teaching of musculoskeletal examination skills amongst medical students. METHODS: This was a qualitative study including six focus groups with specialities most often involved in delivering musculoskeletal clinical teaching: rheumatology, orthopaedics, general practice, and geriatrics. RESULTS: The main barriers to the delivery of effective clinical teaching included the lack of agreement on what to teach, lack of confidence in teaching amongst non-musculoskeletal specialities, and poor communication between specialities. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to overcome the identified barriers if musculoskeletal clinical teaching to medical students is to be improved. In particular, there is a need to agree which examination skills medical students should learn.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Physical Examination/methods , Teaching/methods , Adult , Educational Measurement , Family Practice/education , Female , Focus Groups , Geriatrics/education , Humans , Male , Musculoskeletal System/physiopathology , Orthopedics/education , Rheumatology/education , Students, Medical , United Kingdom
6.
Med Teach ; 23(6): 585-590, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12098480

ABSTRACT

The objective was to determine whether routinely available textbooks describe the core musculoskeletal examination skills for medical students. Textbooks were evaluated for content against a list of 27 core examination skills as perceived by rheumatologists, orthopaedic surgeons and general practitioners. The study took place in Newcastle upon Tyne, libraries of the rheumatology department, teaching hospital and medical school. The main outcome was the inclusion of a description of examination skills by available textbooks. Median score for each textbook was only 19 (range 1-24) of a possible 27 core skills. Screening examination was not included in general texts. General principles were well covered but detail was insufficient, particularly in texts aimed at students taking final examinations. It is not easy for students to access adequate information about core items of musculoskeletal examination from textbooks readily available to them. This may reflect a general view of the lack of importance of musculoskeletal clinical examination skills.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...