A 2-step comprehensive high-dose chemoradiotherapy second-line program for relapsed and refractory Hodgkin disease: analysis by intent to treat and development of a prognostic model.

Salvage of patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin disease (HD) with high-dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) results in event-free survival (EFS) rates from 30% to 50%. Unfortunately, the reduction in toxicity associated with modern supportive care has improved EFS by only 5% to 10% and has not reduced the relapse rate. Results of a comprehensive 2-step protocol encompassing dose-dense and dose-intense second-line chemotherapy, followed by HDT and ASCT, are reported. Sixty-five consecutive patients, 22 with primary refractory HD and 43 with relapsed HD, were treated with 2 biweekly cycles of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE). Peripheral blood progenitor cells from responding patients were collected, and the patients were given accelerated fractionation involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) followed by cyclophosphamide-etoposide and either intensive accelerated fractionation total lymphoid irradiation or carmustine and ASCT. The EFS rate at a median follow-up of 43 months, as analyzed by intent to treat, was 58%. The response rate to ICE was 88%, and the EFS rate for patients who underwent transplantation was 68%. Cox regression analysis identified 3 factors before the initiation of ICE that predicted for outcome: B symptoms, extranodal disease, and complete remission duration of less than 1 year. EFS rates were 83% for patients with 0 to 1 adverse factors, 27% for patients with 2 factors, and 10% for patients with 3 factors (P <.001). These results compare favorably with other series and document the feasibility and efficacy of giving uniform dose-dense and dose-intense cytoreductive chemotherapy and integrating accelerated fractionation radiotherapy into an ASCT treatment program. This prognostic model provides a basis for risk-adapted HDT.

Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide: a highly effective cytoreduction and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a chemotherapy regimen that consisted of ifosfamide administered as an infusion with bolus carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for cytoreduction and stem-cell mobilization in transplant-eligible patients with primary refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-three transplant-eligible patients with relapsed or primary refractory NHL were treated from October 1993 to December 1997 with ICE chemotherapy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Administration of three cycles of ICE chemotherapy was planned at 2-week intervals. Peripheral-blood progenitor cells were collected after cycle 3, and all patients who achieved a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to ICE chemotherapy were eligible to proceed to transplantation. Event-free and overall survival, ICE-related toxicity, and the number of CD34(+) cells collected after treatment with ICE and G-CSF were evaluated. RESULTS: All 163 patients were assessable for response, and there was no treatment-related mortality. A major response (CR/PR) was evident in 108 patients (66.3%); 89% of the responding patients underwent successful transplantation. Patient who underwent transplantation and achieved a CR to ICE had a superior overall survival to that of patients who achieved a PR (65% v 30%; P =.003). The median number of CD34(+) cells/kg collected was 8.4 x 10(6). The dose-limiting toxicity of ICE was hematologic, with 29.4% of patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. There were minimal nonhematologic side effects. CONCLUSION: ICE chemotherapy, with ifosfamide administered as a 24-hour infusion to decrease CNS side effects, and the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin to minimize nephrotoxicity, is a very effective cytoreduction and mobilization regimen in patients with NHL. Furthermore, the quality of the clinical response to ICE predicts for posttransplant outcome.

Factors affecting mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoma.

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with poor mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) or delayed platelet engraftment after high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma. Fifty-eight patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma underwent PBPC transplantation as the "best available therapy" at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) between 1993 and 1995. PBPCs were mobilized with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (n = 19) or G-CSF following combination chemotherapy (n = 39). Forty-eight of these patients underwent a PBPC transplant, receiving a conditioning regimen containing cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and either total body irradiation, total lymphoid irradiation, or carmustine. A median number of 4.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were obtained with a median of three leukapheresis procedures. Mobilization of PBPCs using chemotherapy plus G-CSF was superior to G-CSF alone (6.7 x 10(6) versus 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.0002). Poorer mobilization of progenitor cells was observed in patients who had previously received stem cell-toxic chemotherapy, including (a) nitrogen mustard, procarbazine, melphalan, carmustine or > 7.5 g of cytarabine chemotherapy premobilization (2.0 x 10(6) versus 6.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.005), or (b) > or = 11 cycles of any previous chemotherapy (2.6 x 10(6) versus 6.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.02). Platelet recovery to > 20,000/microliter was delayed in patients who received < 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells (median, 13 versus 22 days; P = 0.06). Patients who received > or = 11 cycles of chemotherapy prior to PBPC mobilization tended to have delayed platelet recovery to > 20,000/microliter and to require more platelet transfusions than less extensively pretreated patients (median, 13.5 versus 23.5 days; P = 0.15; median number of platelet transfusion episodes, 13 versus 9; P = 0.17). These data suggest that current strategies to mobilize PBPCs may be suboptimal in patients who have received either stem cell-toxic chemotherapy or > or = 11 cycles of chemotherapy prior to PBPC mobilization. Alternative approaches, such as ex vivo expansion or the use of other growth factors in addition to G-CSF, may improve mobilization of progenitor cells for PBPC transplantation.