ABSTRACT
The study's aim was to analyze a series of colon cancer cases in which the mirage of the first (clinically most obvious) lesion (gallstones) along with its minimally invasive approach - that explored only the biliary disease - had contributed to the delay of large bowel malignancy' diagnosis and treatment. 1327 patients aged between 17 and 83 years and diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis were operated upon laparoscopically in the Department of General Surgery of Craiova CFR University Hospital from 2000 through 2004. Four out of these 1327 patients (0,3%) were readmitted with the diagnosis of colon carcinoma between 1 and 16 months after the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our retrospective study gives a full report on these 4 cases insisting upon the links between their clinical - laboratory evaluations and final diagnosis. Despite the low laparoscopic cholecystectomy overlooked colon cancer' incidence it seems reasonable to both improve the technique of peritoneal cavity exploration during this type of surgery and extend the preoperative evaluation whenever the slightest suspicion of associated pathology is raised especially in patients over 50 years of age.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholelithiasis/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholelithiasis/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The aims of this paper are both to highlight some dilemmas concerning the diagnosis of primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma mainly in its early stages and to underline the capricious responses of this type of malignancy to an otherwise well coded modern management. This study is based on the analysis of the records of 78 patients with ovarian carcinoma admitted for diagnosis and surgical treatment to the Department of General Surgery of Craiova C.F.R. Clinic from 1993 through 2003. The results of this analysis are difficult to interpret due to loss to follow up (in terms of response rates) of some of our 78 operated on ovarian carcinoma patients who went on with their platinum-based chemotherapy (following surgical cytoreduction) under the supervision of different Oncology Departments nationwide. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that most of this study patients (71.9%) presented with advanced-stage (III and IV) ovarian carcinoma which sometimes seemed quite confusing by its clinical polymorphism but its prognosis was very much related to both the degree of surgical cytoreduction accomplished and tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy. Finally, although this study does not allow us to draw firm conclusions it is an attempt to share out our current perception on the primary epithelial ovarian cancer management.