ABSTRACT
This study examined effects of caffeine on session ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) following 30 min constant-load cycling. Individuals (n = 15) of varying aerobic fitness completed a [Formula: see text] max trial and two 30 min cycling bouts (double-blind, counterbalanced) following ingestion of 6 mL/kg of caffeine or matched placebo. RPE overall, legs and breathing were estimated every 5 min and session RPE was estimated 30 min post-exercise using the OMNI pictorial scale. Session RPE for caffeine and placebo trails were compared using paired t test. Between-trial comparisons of HR, RPE overall, RPE legs and RPE breathing were analyzed using an independent 2 (trial) × 6 (time point) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each dependent variable. Caffeine resulted in a significantly lower session RPE (p < 0.05) for caffeine (6.1 ± 2.2) versus placebo (6.8 ± 2.1). Acute perceptual responses were significantly lower for caffeine for RPE overall (15, 20, 25, and 30 min), RPE breathing (15, 20, 25, and 30 min) and RPE legs (20 and 30 min). Survey responses post-exercise revealed greater feelings of nervousness, tremors, restlessness and stomach distress following caffeine versus placebo. Blunted acute RPE and survey responses suggest participants responded to caffeine ingestion. Caffeine decreased acute RPE during exercise which could partially account for lower session RPE responses. However, decreased session RPE could also reveal a latent analgesic affect of caffeine extending into recovery. Extending the understanding of session RPE could benefit coaches in avoiding overtraining when adjusting training programs.
Subject(s)
Caffeine/administration & dosage , Exercise/psychology , Perception/drug effects , Physical Exertion/drug effects , Adult , Athletic Performance/physiology , Athletic Performance/psychology , Bicycling/physiology , Bicycling/psychology , Exercise/physiology , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Male , Physical Endurance/drug effects , Physical Endurance/physiology , Placebos , Research Design , Single-Blind Method , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Attempts at in-vitro fertilization (IVF) may be used as a method of evaluating whether in a given couple, the inability of the sperm to fertilize the oocyte may be the cause of infertility. We evaluated all IVF patients in our practice who had at least one cycle with no fertilization to determine how often this was an isolated event or was repeated in multiple cycles; would poor semen quality be found as a frequent cause; and how well can a donor sperm or oocyte 'probe' uncover which of the two is the problem? Of 35 couples who used their own gametes exclusively, 30 (85.7%) had at least one cycle with zero fertilization; 42.5% of those failing to fertilize in cycle 1 and 35% of those failing in cycle 2 had a subnormal concentration of motile spermatozoa, morphology or hypo-osmotic swelling test scores. The pregnancy rate per cycle with both husband's and wife's gametes was only 2.3% (3/130), but was 8.3% for those using donor spermatozoa (3/36) and 18.2% (2/11) for donor oocytes. Thus, failing to fertilize in a given cycle does not necessarily predict failure to fertilize in a subsequent cycle, but does predict a poor fertility outcome unless donor gametes are used.
Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Infertility/therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Oocytes/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Spermatozoa/physiology , Tissue Donors , Treatment FailureABSTRACT
Two women with elevated preoperative serum CA-125 levels were found to have extensive endometriosis - one, the highest level related to endometriosis ever reported in the English literature. Endometriosis was found to be etiologic as seen by the prompt reduction in serum CA-125 levels following surgical treatment limited to endometriosis. Thus, a very high CA-125 level does not necessarily forebode ovarian malignancy.
