Factors associated with falls in hemodialysis patients: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: to identify possible associations between a higher probability of falls among hemodialysis patients and laboratory values, comorbidities, pharmacological treatment, hemodynamic changes, dialysis results and stabilometric alterations. METHOD: this was a retrospective case-control study with hemodialysis patients. Patients in a hemodialysis unit who had suffered one or more falls were included in the case group. Patients from the same unit who had not suffered falls were the controls. Data were gathered from the patients' clinical history and also from the results of a balance test conducted six months before the study. RESULTS: thirty-one patients were included (10 cases and 21 controls). Intradialytic body weight change was significantly greater among cases (p <0.05). Patients in the case group also presented greater lateral instability after dialysis (p <0.05). Other factors such as high blood pressure, antihypertensives, beta-blockers, and lower heart rates were also associated with falls. CONCLUSION: a greater intradialytic weight change was associated with an increase in risk of falls. Nursing staff can control these factors to prevent the incidence of falls in dialysis patients.

Factors associated with falls in hemodialysis patients: a case-control study / Factores asociados a caídas en pacientes hemodializados: un estudio de caso-control / Fatores associados às quedas em pacientes de hemodiálise: um estudo caso-controle

Objective: to identify possible associations between a higher probability of falls among hemodialysis patients and laboratory values, comorbidities, pharmacological treatment, hemodynamic changes, dialysis results and stabilometric alterations. Method: this was a retrospective case-control study with hemodialysis patients. Patients in a hemodialysis unit who had suffered one or more falls were included in the case group. Patients from the same unit who had not suffered falls were the controls. Data were gathered from the patients' clinical history and also from the results of a balance test conducted six months before the study. Results: thirty-one patients were included (10 cases and 21 controls). Intradialytic body weight change was significantly greater among cases (p <0.05). Patients in the case group also presented greater lateral instability after dialysis (p <0.05). Other factors such as high blood pressure, antihypertensives, beta-blockers, and lower heart rates were also associated with falls. Conclusion: a greater intradialytic weight change was associated with an increase in risk of falls. Nursing staff can control these factors to prevent the incidence of falls in dialysis patients.

Objetivo: identificar la posible asociación entre los valores analíticos, comorbilidades, tratamiento farmacológico, cambios hemodinámicos, resultado de la diálisis y alteraciones estabilométricas con una mayor probabilidad de caídas en pacientes en hemodiálisis. Método: estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles en pacientes en hemodiálisis. Se consideraron como casos pacientes de una unidad de hemodiálisis que habían sufrido una o varias caídas. Los controles fueron pacientes de la misma unidad que no sufrieron caídas. Se obtuvieron los datos de la historia clínica de los pacientes y, también, se valoró una prueba de equilibrio realizada 6 meses antes a dichos pacientes. Resultados: se incluyeron 31 pacientes (10 casos y 21 controles). El cambio de peso durante la diálisis fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de personas que sufrieron una caída (p <0,05). Los pacientes que sufrieron una caída presentaron mayor inestabilidad lateral después de la diálisis (p <0.05). Otros factores como la hipertensión arterial, los antihipertensivos, los betabloqueantes y las frecuencias cardiacas más bajas también se relacionaron con las caídas. Conclusión: un mayor cambio de peso intradiálisis se relaciona con mayor riesgo de caídas. El control de estos factores por parte del personal de enfermería podría prevenir la incidencia de caídas en pacientes dializados.

Objetivo: identificar a possível associação entre valores laboratoriais, comorbidades, tratamento farmacológico, alterações hemodinâmicas, resultado da diálise e alterações estabilométricas com uma maior probabilidade de quedas em pacientes de hemodiálise. Método: estudo caso-controle retrospectivo em pacientes de hemodiálise. Foram analisados os casos de pacientes de uma unidade de hemodiálise que sofreram uma ou mais quedas. Os controles foram pacientes da mesma unidade que não sofreram quedas. Os dados foram obtidos a partir do histórico clínico dos pacientes e, também, de um teste de equilíbrio realizado seis meses antes nesses pacientes. Resultados: 31 pacientes foram avaliados (10 casos e 21 controles). A alteração de peso durante a diálise foi significativamente maior no grupo de pessoas que sofreu uma queda (p <0,05). Pacientes que sofreram queda apresentaram maior instabilidade lateral após a diálise (p <0,05). Outros fatores, como hipertensão, anti-hipertensivos, betabloqueadores e frequência cardíaca mais baixa, também foram associados às quedas. Conclusão: uma maior alteração do peso intradialítico está relacionada a um maior risco de quedas. O controle desses fatores pela equipe de enfermagem poderia prevenir a incidência de quedas em pacientes em diálise.

Acute effect of citrate bath on postdialysis alkalaemia.

INTRODUCTION: The correction of metabolic acidosis caused by renal failure is achieved by adding bicarbonate during dialysis. In order to avoid the precipitation of calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate that takes place in the dialysis fluid (DF) when adding bicarbonate, it is necessary to add an acid, usually acetate, which is not free of side effects. Thus, citrate appears as an advantageous alternative to acetate, despite the fact that its acute effects are not accurately known. OBJECTIVE: To assess the acute effect of a dialysis fluid containing citrate instead of acetate on acid-base balance and calcium-phosphorus metabolism parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective crossover study was conducted with twenty-four patients (15 male subjects and 9 female subjects). All patients underwent dialysis with AK-200-Ultra-S monitor with SoftPac® dialysis fluid, made with 3 mmol/L of acetate and SelectBag Citrate®, with 1 mmol/L of citrate and free of acetate. The following were measured before and after dialysis: venous blood gas monitoring, calcium (Ca), ionic calcium (Cai), phosphorus (P) and parathyroid hormone (PTH). RESULTS: Differences (p<0.05) were found when using the citrate bath (C) compared to acetate (A) in the postdialysis values of: pH, C: 7.43 (0.04) vs. A: 7.47 (0.05); bicarbonate, C: 24.7 (2.7) vs. A: 27.3 (2.1) mmol/L; base excess (BEecf), C: 0.4 (3.1) vs. A: 3.7 (2.4) mmol/L; corrected calcium (Cac), C: 9.8 (0.8) vs. A: 10.1 (0.7) mg/dL; and Cai, C: 1.16 (0.05) vs. A: 1.27 (0.06) mmol/L. No differences were found in either of the parameters measured before dialysis. CONCLUSION: Dialysis with citrate provides better control of postdialysis acid-base balance, decreases/avoids postdialysis alkalaemia, and lowers the increase in Cac and Cai. This finding is of special interest in patients with predisposing factors for arrhythmia and patients with respiratory failure, carbon dioxide retention, calcifications and advanced liver disease.