Efectividad de la mensajería móvil para el control glucémico en pacientes diabéticos en atención primaria. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado / Effectiveness of mobile messaging for glycemic control in diabetic patients in primary care. Randomized clinical trial

No disponible

Assessment of a smartphone app (Capstesia) for measuring pulse pressure variation: agreement between two methods: A Cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Less invasive and noninvasive methods are emerging for haemodynamic monitoring. Among them is Capstesia, a smartphone app that, from photographs of a patient monitor showing invasive arterial pressure, estimates advanced haemodynamic variables after digitising and analysing the pressure curves. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the level of agreement between the analysis of the signals obtained from the patient monitor and a photograph of the same images using the Capstesia app. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Araba University hospital (Txagorritxu), Vitoria-Gasteiz, Alava, Spain, from January to February 2015. PATIENTS: Twenty patients (229 images) who had an arterial catheter (radial or femoral artery) inserted for haemodynamic monitoring. INTERVENTION: Snapshots obtained from the patient monitor and a photograph of these same snapshots using the Capstesia application were assessed with the same software (MATLAB, Mathworks, Natick, Massachusetats, USA) for evaluating the level of concordance of the following variables: pulse pressure variation (PPV), cardiac output (CO) and maximum slope of the pressure curve (dP/dt). Comparison was made using interclass correlation coefficients with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, and Bland-Altman plots with the corresponding percentages of error. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (PPV). Secondary outcome: CO and maximum slope of the pressure curve [dP/dt]. RESULTS: The interclass correlation coefficients for PPV, CO and max dP/dt were 0.991 (95% confidence interval 0.988 to 0.993), 0.966 (95% confidence interval 0.956 to 0.974) and 0.962 (95% confidence interval 0.950 to 0.970), respectively. In the Bland-Altman analysis, bias and limits of agreement of PPV were (0.50% ±â€Š1.42) resulting in a percentage of error of 20% for PPV. For CO they were 0.19 ±â€Š0.341, with a 13.8% of error. Finally bias and limits of agreement for max dP/dt were 1.33 ±â€Š77.71, resulting in an error of 14.20% CONCLUSIONS: Photograph of the screenshots obtained with the Capstesia app show a good concordance with analysis of the original screenshots. Either approach could be used to monitor the haemodynamic variables assessed.

Effectiveness and efficiency of platelet rich plasma in the treatment of diabetic ulcers.

"There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that wound healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers is growth factor dependent, and that the therapeutic delivery of these growth factors to wounds topically, has the potential ability to accelerate wound healing in conjunction with conventional wound care". There is, however, confusion about the utility of platelet rich plasma because the studies that have evaluated them use a wide range of products (different platelet and leukocyte concentrations, different techniques and frequencies of application, very heterogeneous simple, and different endpoints) making almost impossible to compare data and draw conclusions. In this study, we have analyzed the different platelet rich plasma products from a new perspective: cost-efficiency. According to our data, we observe that platelet rich plasma is a cost-effective option that allows faster healing of ulcers, and that should be taken into account in patients with long evolution ulcers.

Drug delivery technologies and stem cells for tissue repair and regeneration.

In the last few years several technologies are being developed for eventually repairing or replacing damaged or injured tissues and even organs. Some of these emerging technologies include the design and development of new biomaterials, the optimization of nano- and micro-technologies for drug and cell delivery, the use of autologous proteins or the application of stem cells as therapeutics. Thus, several types of stem cells, e.g. ESCs, iPSCs, MSCs, CD133+ stem cells are being evaluated for tissue regeneration purposes. The present review describes some of these emerging technologies and discusses their potential benefits and challenges.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of alendronate and zoledronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two bisphosphonates (alendronate and zoledronate) in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The incidence of fractures was considered as primary endpoint. Only randomized trials with a follow-up period of 1 year or more were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We excluded studies that included patients with secondary osteoporosis especially in relation to therapy with corticosteroids or other drugs or diseases known to affect bone mineral density. Studies published as subgroup analysis, extension studies, economic evaluations, and comparisons with active control were excluded. The methodological quality of controlled clinical trials that met these inclusion criteria was evaluated. No studies were excluded from analysis due to lack of quality. The risk ratio of hip, vertebral and wrist fractures for alendronate were 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.93], 0.54 (95% CI 0.44-0.66) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.33-1.25), respectively. Zoledronate risk ratio was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.82) and 0.38 (95% CI 0.22-0.67) for hip and vertebral fractures, respectively.

Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of health professionals in relation to A/H1N1 influenza and its vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the intention of health professionals, doctors and nurses, concerning whether or not to be vaccinated against A/H1N1 influenza virus, and their perception of the severity of this pandemic compared with seasonal flu. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out based on an questionnaire e-mailed to health professionals in public healthcare centres in Vitoria between 6 and 16 November 2009; the percentage of respondents who wanted to be vaccinated and who perceived the pandemic flu to carry a high risk of death were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 115 people completed the questionnaire of whom 61.7% (n=71) were doctors and 38.3% (n=44) were nurses. Of these, 33.3% (n=23) of doctors and 13.6% (n=6) of nurses intended to be vaccinated (p=0.019). Even among those who considered themselves to be at a high risk, 70.6% (n=48) of doctors and 31.7% (n=13) of nurses participating in the study (p=0.001) planned to have the vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Most health professionals, and in particular nurses, had no intention to be vaccinated against A/H1N1 influenza virus at the beginning of the vaccination campaign.

Variability of indication criteria in knee and hip replacement: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Total knee (TKR) and hip (THR) replacement (arthroplasty) are effective surgical procedures that relieve pain, improve patients' quality of life and increase functional capacity. Studies on variations in medical practice usually place the indications for performing these procedures to be highly variable, because surgeons appear to follow different criteria when recommending surgery in patients with different severity levels. We therefore proposed a study to evaluate inter-hospital variability in arthroplasty indication. METHODS: The pre-surgical condition of 1603 patients included was compared by their personal characteristics, clinical situation and self-perceived health status. Patients were asked to complete two health-related quality of life questionnaires: the generic SF-12 (Short Form) and the specific WOMAC (Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities) scale. The type of patient undergoing primary arthroplasty was similar in the 15 different hospitals evaluated.The variability in baseline WOMAC score between hospitals in THR and TKR indication was described by range, mean and standard deviation (SD), mean and standard deviation weighted by the number of procedures at each hospital, high/low ratio or extremal quotient (EQ5-95), variation coefficient (CV5-95) and weighted variation coefficient (WCV5-95) for 5-95 percentile range. The variability in subjective and objective signs was evaluated using median, range and WCV5-95. The appropriateness of the procedures performed was calculated using a specific threshold proposed by Quintana et al for assessing pain and functional capacity. RESULTS: The variability expressed as WCV5-95 was very low, between 0.05 and 0.11 for all three dimensions on WOMAC scale for both types of procedure in all participating hospitals. The variability in the physical and mental SF-12 components was very low for both types of procedure (0.08 and 0.07 for hip and 0.03 and 0.07 for knee surgery patients). However, a moderate-high variability was detected in subjective-objective signs. Among all the surgeries performed, approximately a quarter of them could be considered to be inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS: A greater inter-hospital variability was observed for objective than for subjective signs for both procedures, suggesting that the differences in clinical criteria followed by surgeons when indicating arthroplasty are the main responsible factors for the variation in surgery rates.

Estudio transversal basado en la población sobre la aceptabilidad de la vacuna y la percepción de la gravedad de la gripe A/H1N1: opinión de la población general y de los profesionales sanitarios / Population-based cross sectional study about vaccine acceptability and perception of the severity of A/H1N1 influenza: Opinion of the general population and health professionals

ObjetivosDeterminar la intención de la población general y de los profesionales sanitarios de vacunarse contra la gripe A/H1N1, así como la percepción que tienen de la gravedad de la gripe A/H1N1 en comparación con la gripe estacional.MétodosEstudio transversal mediante encuesta telefónica a una muestra de población general, a partir de la guía telefónica, y electrónica a profesionales sanitarios de los centros asistenciales públicos de Vitoria-Gasteiz, entre los días 6 y 16 de noviembre de 2009. En ambos colectivos se calcularon las frecuencias absolutas y relativas de los que se querían vacunar y de los que perciben la gripe como un riesgo alto para la vida.ResultadosContestaron al cuestionario el 33% (n=219) de las 637 personas contactadas y se obtuvieron 109 respuestas de profesionales. El 63,0% (n=138) de la población general y el 73,4% (n=80) de la población sanitaria no se vacunaría si la vacuna fuese gratis (p=0,595). En caso de pertenecer a alguno de los grupos de riesgo no se vacunaría el 14,6% (n=32) de la población ni el 40,4% (n=44) de los sanitarios (p<0,001). El porcentaje de indecisos entre la población general es del 25,6%, frente al 6,4% de los profesionales sanitarios.ConclusionesLa mayoría de la población no tiene, al inicio de la campaña de vacunación, intención de vacunarse contra la gripe A. La proporción es similar a la del colectivo de profesionales sanitarios, salvo bajo el supuesto de pertenecer a grupos de riesgo, en cuyo caso hay un importante grupo de indecisos entre la población (AU)

ObjectivesTo determine the intention of general population and health professionals to vaccinate against the H1N1 influenza A virus. To determine the perception of severity of the H1N1 influenza A in both groups compared to that of seasonal influenza.MethodsCross-sectional telephone survey performed to a sample of population (obtained randomly from the Vitoria-Gasteiz telephone directory) and cross-sectional electronically-administered survey to a sample of health professionals from public health centres in Vitoria-Gasteiz, conducted between 6th and 16th November 2009. The relative and absolute frecuency of persons willing to be vaccinated and the proportion of those considering the H1N1 influenza A as a life-threatening risk were calculated in both groups.Results219 (33%) persons out of 637 contacted telephone numbers answered the questionnaire, as well as 109 health professionals. 63.0% (n=138) of general population and 73.4% (n=80) of the professional group would not undergo vaccination, even if it was for free (p=0.595). If belonging to a high-risk group, the corresponding proportions of unwillingness were 14.6% (n=32) for general population and 40.4 (n=44) for professionals (p<0.001). The proportion of undecided persons is 25.6% (n=56) in general population, against 6.4% (n=7) among the professionals.ConclusionsAt the beginning of the vaccination campaign, the majority of population is unwilling to undergo immunization against the H1N1 influenza A virus. The proportion in general population is similar to that among the health professionals. However, when belonging to a high-risk group, there is a high proportion of undecided persons in general population (AU)

[Population-based cross sectional study about vaccine acceptability and perception of the severity of A/H1N1 influenza: opinion of the general population and health professionals]. / Estudio transversal basado en la población sobre la aceptabilidad de la vacuna y la percepción de la gravedad de la gripe A/H1N1: opinión de la población general y de los profesionales sanitarios.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the intention of general population and health professionals to vaccinate against the H1N1 influenza A virus. To determine the perception of severity of the H1N1 influenza A in both groups compared to that of seasonal influenza. METHODS: Cross-sectional telephone survey performed to a sample of population (obtained randomly from the Vitoria-Gasteiz telephone directory) and cross-sectional electronically-administered survey to a sample of health professionals from public health centres in Vitoria-Gasteiz, conducted between 6th and 16th November 2009. The relative and absolute frecuency of persons willing to be vaccinated and the proportion of those considering the H1N1 influenza A as a life-threatening risk were calculated in both groups. RESULTS: 219 (33%) persons out of 637 contacted telephone numbers answered the questionnaire, as well as 109 health professionals. 63.0% (n=138) of general population and 73.4% (n=80) of the professional group would not undergo vaccination, even if it was for free (p=0.595). If belonging to a high-risk group, the corresponding proportions of unwillingness were 14.6% (n=32) for general population and 40.4 (n=44) for professionals (p<0.001). The proportion of undecided persons is 25.6% (n=56) in general population, against 6.4% (n=7) among the professionals. CONCLUSIONS: At the beginning of the vaccination campaign, the majority of population is unwilling to undergo immunization against the H1N1 influenza A virus. The proportion in general population is similar to that among the health professionals. However, when belonging to a high-risk group, there is a high proportion of undecided persons in general population.