Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 149: 110570, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31542593

ABSTRACT

Microbial safety of recreational waters is a significant public health issue. In this study we assessed the occurrence and quantity of enteric viruses in bathing and non-bathing waters in Italy, in parallel with microbial faecal indicators, somatic coliphages and Vibrio spp. Enteric viruses (aichivirus, norovirus and enterovirus) were detected in 55% of bathing water samples, including samples with bacterial indicator concentrations compliant with the European bathing water Directive. Aichivirus was the most frequent and abundant virus. Adenovirus was detected only in non-bathing waters. Somatic coliphages were identified in 50% bathing water samples, 80% of which showed simultaneous presence of viruses. Vibrio species were ubiquitous, with 9 species identified, including potential pathogens (V. cholerae, V. parahaemoylticus and V. vulnificus). This is the first study showing the occurrence and high concentration of Aichivirus in bathing waters and provides original information, useful in view of a future revision of the European Directive.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches , Seawater/microbiology , Seawater/virology , Coliphages , Enterovirus , Environmental Monitoring , Feces/microbiology , Feces/virology , Humans , Italy , Mediterranean Sea , Norovirus/genetics , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Vibrio/genetics , Vibrio/isolation & purification , Vibrio/pathogenicity , Water Microbiology
2.
Toxicol Lett ; 74(1): 91-7, 1994 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8085273

ABSTRACT

Samples of diarrhoeic shellfish poison (DSP) mussels from several parts of the Italian Adriatic coastline were extracted and tested according to a number of different methods presently available, i.e. Yasumoto's mouse biotest, Kat's biotest, the ELISA test and the HPLC method. Results were compared for toxic levels detected in each sample. While a common qualitative result (toxic/non-toxic) was given by all the methods, no clear quantitative agreement was found. The differences between methods and consequent lack of agreement in results are discussed.


Subject(s)
Bivalvia/chemistry , Ethers, Cyclic/analysis , Marine Toxins/analysis , Animals , Biological Assay , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Diarrhea/etiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Ethers, Cyclic/toxicity , Female , Marine Toxins/toxicity , Mice , Okadaic Acid , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...