Propofol sedation does not improve measures of colonoscopy quality but increase cost - findings from a large population-based cohort study.

Background: Propofol is often used for sedation during colonoscopy. We assessed the impact of propofol sedation on colonoscopy related quality metrics and cost in a population-based cohort study. Methods: All colonoscopies performed at 21 hospitals in the province of Ontario, Canada, during an 18-month period, from April 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018, using either propofol or conscious sedation were evaluated. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR) and secondary outcomes were sessile serrated polyp detection rate (ssPDR), polyp detection rate (PDR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and perforation rate. Binary outcomes were assessed using a modified Poisson regression model adjusted for clustering and potential confounders based on patient, procedure, and physician characteristics. Findings: A total of 46,634 colonoscopies were performed, of which 16,408 (35.2%) received propofol and 30,226 (64.8%) received conscious sedation. Compared to conscious sedation, the use of propofol was associated with a lower ADR (24.6% vs. 27.0%, p < 0.0001) but not ssPDR (5.0% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.26), PDR (40.5% vs 40.4%, p = 0.79), CIR (97.1% vs. 96.8%, p = 0.15) or perforation rate (0.04% vs. 0.06%, p = 0.45). On multi-variable analysis, propofol sedation was not associated with any differences in ADR (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.10, p = 0.30), ssPDR (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.90-1.60, p = 0.22), PDR (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.90-1.11, p = 0.99), or CIR (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.80-1.26, p = 0.99). The additional cost associated with propofol sedation was $12,730,496 for every 100,000 cases. Interpretation: The use of propofol sedation was not associated with improved colonoscopy related quality metrics but increased costs. The routine use of propofol for colonoscopy should be reevaluated. Funding: None.

Association of Trainee Participation in Colonoscopy Procedures With Quality Metrics.

Importance: Trainees routinely participate in colonoscopy procedures, yet whether their involvement is positively or negatively associated with procedural quality is unknown because prior studies involved small number of trainees and/or supervisors, lacked generalizability, and/or failed to adjust for potential confounders. Objective: To assess the association between trainee participation and colonoscopy quality metrics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter population-based cohort study was conducted at 21 academic and community hospitals between April 1, 2017, and October 31, 2018, among consecutive adult patients undergoing colonoscopy. Procedures performed by endoscopists who did not supervise trainees were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed from April 3, 2017, to October 31, 2018. Exposure: Participation by a trainee, defined as a resident or fellow enrolled in a gastroenterology or general surgery training program. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), and secondary outcomes were sessile serrated polyp detection rate (ssPDR), polyp detection rate (PDR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and perforation rate. Results: A total of 35 499 colonoscopies (18 989 women [53.5%]; mean [SD] patient age, 60.0 [14.1] years) were performed by 71 physicians (mean [SD] time in practice, 14.0 [9.3] years); 5941 colonoscopies (16.7%) involved trainees. There were no significant differences in the ADR (26.4% vs 27.3%; P = .19), CIR (96.7% vs 97.2%; P = .07), and perforation rate (0.05% vs 0.06%; P = .82) when trainees participated vs when they did not participate, whereas the the ssPDR (4.4% vs 5.2%; P = .009) and PDR (39.2% vs 42.0%; P < .001) were significantly lower when trainees participated vs when they did not. After adjustment for potential confounders, the ADR (risk ratio [RR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.03; P = .30), PDR (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04; P = .47), and CIR (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.10; P = .38) were not associated with trainee participation, although the ssPDR remained significantly lower (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that trainee involvement during colonoscopy was associated with reduced ssPDR but not other colonoscopy outcome measures. Extra care should be exercised when examining the right colon when trainees are involved.

Point-of-care ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular torsion: a practical resident curriculum.

Background: Prompt Doppler ultrasonography to aid in diagnosis is often key to managing testicular torsion, but there may be delays in access; a faster, more widely available alternative is point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a scrotal POCUS curriculum for urology and emergency medicine residents. Methods: Content experts in urology, emergency medicine and diagnostic imaging collaborated in a modified Delphi method to design a practical didactic curriculum for scrotal POCUS for the identification of testicular torsion. Training included 3 online video teaching modules and a 1-hour hands-on teaching session with standardized adult patients. We evaluated participants' competency in scrotal POCUS using a validated scale. We assessed participants' knowledge, comfort and confidence in performing scrotal POCUS before and after the intervention and at 3 months. Results: Twenty-four urology (n = 12) and emergency medicine (n = 12) residents participated in the curriculum. After hands-on practice, 23 participants (96%) were deemed competent at scrotal POCUS. Pre-post testing showed significant improvement in knowledge (mean score 63% v. 80%, p < 0.001), comfort (mean Likert score 0.6 v. 3.6, p < 0.001) and confidence (mean Likert score 1.0 v. 2.1, p < 0.001) after the intervention. These effects were maintained at the 3-month assessment. Conclusion: The scrotal POCUS curriculum was effective and acceptable to both urology and emergency medicine residents. The findings suggest that scrotal POCUS can be learned effectively through a short hands-on session and didactic instruction.

Contexte: Le diagnostic rapide d'une torsion testiculaire à l'aide d'une échographie Doppler est souvent crucial à la prise en charge de ce trouble. Or, comme l'accès à cet examen peut être limité, l'échographie portable constitue une solution de rechange rapide et largement accessible. La présente étude visait la mise au point et l'évaluation d'un programme de formation sur l'échographie portable scrotale destiné aux résidents en urologie et en médecine d'urgence. Méthodes: Des experts en urologie, en médecine d'urgence et en imagerie diagnostique se sont servis d'une méthode Delphi modifiée pour concevoir un programme de formation sur l'échographie portable visant à faciliter le diagnostic de la torsion testiculaire. Ce programme comprenait 3 modules d'apprentissage vidéo en ligne, ainsi qu'une séance pratique d'une heure auprès de patients adultes normalisés. Nous avons évalué les compétences des participants en matière d'échographie portable scrotale au moyen d'une échelle validée. Nous avons également évalué les connaissances, l'aisance et le niveau de confiance des participants à l'égard de cet examen avant et immédiatement après la formation, puis 3 mois plus tard. Résultats: Au total, 24 résidents en urologie (n = 12) et en médecine d'urgence (n = 12) ont suivi le programme de formation. Après la séance pratique, 23 participants (96 %) avaient les compétences nécessaires à la réalisation d'une échographie portable scrotale. La comparaison des résultats obtenus avant et immédiatement après la formation a montré une augmentation significative des connaissances (note moyenne : 63 % c. 80 %; p < 0,001), de l'aisance (moyenne à l'échelle de Likert : 0,6 c. 3,6; p < 0,001) et du niveau de confiance (moyenne à l'échelle de Likert : 1,0 c. 2,1; p < 0,001) des participants. Les effets de la formation étaient toujours présents 3 mois plus tard. Conclusion: Le programme de formation sur l'échographie portable scrotale s'est avéré efficace et acceptable pour les résidents en urologie et en médecine d'urgence. Les résultats obtenus laissent croire qu'une formation pédagogique et une courte séance d'apprentissage pratique permettent l'enseignement efficace de l'échographie portable scrotale.