Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33925535

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The main anthropic sources of exposure to airborne benzene include vehicular traffic, cigarette smoke, and industrial emissions. METHODS: To detect early genotoxic effects of environmental exposure to benzene, we monitored environmental, personal, and indoor airborne benzene in children living in an urban area and an area near a petrochemical plant. We also used urinary benzene and S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA) as biomarkers of benzene exposure and urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a biomarker of early genotoxic effects. RESULTS: Although always below the European Union limit of 5 µg/m3, airborne benzene levels were more elevated in the indoor, outdoor, and personal samples from the industrial surroundings compared to the urban area (p = 0.026, p = 0.005, and p = 0.001, respectively). Children living in the surroundings of the petrochemical plant had urinary benzene values significantly higher than those from the urban area in both the morning and evening samples (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Results of multiple regression modelling showed that age was a significant predictor of 8-OHdG excretion, independent of the sampling hour. Moreover, at the low exposure level experienced by the children participating in this study, neither personal or indoor airborne benzene level, nor personal monitoring data, affected 8-OHdG excretion. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the importance of biological monitoring of low-level environmental exposure and its relation to risk of genotoxic effects among children.


Subject(s)
Benzene , Occupational Exposure , Benzene/analysis , Benzene/toxicity , Biomarkers , Child , DNA Damage , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Humans , Italy , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Oxidative Stress , Schools
2.
J Environ Monit ; 11(2): 297-306, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19212585

ABSTRACT

The performance of two types of radiello diffusive samplers, filled with a thermally desorbable adsorbent (graphitised carbon Carbograph 4) and with a solvent desorbable adsorbent (activated charcoal), respectively, have been evaluated for the monitoring of BTEX in ambient air, by comparison with active (pumped) samplers. A two year survey was carried out in Padua, a medium-sized town, in a traffic site, close to a busy crossroad. The concentrations of BTEX were measured for 15 campaigns, during which four series of radial diffusive samplers were exposed for 2 day, 7 day, 10 day and 14 day time periods, respectively. Every series of chemical desorption samplers included three replicates; thermal desorption samplers included six replicates, three of them filled with freshly conditioned cartridges and three filled with regenerated cartridges. No significant difference in the levels measured either by new or by regenerated cartridges has been found. During three campaigns (summer 2004, winter and spring 2005) two active (pumped) samplers were added for each sampling period. The diffusive uptake rates have been calculated and modelled under various conditions of concentration, temperature and exposure time. The effects of the environmental factors on the performances of both solvent and thermally desorbable samplers have been evaluated. The repeatability of the whole measurement process (sampling and analysis) was calculated for every sampling duration. The comparison of concentration levels measured by diffusive and active sampling methods shows correlation coefficients R >or= 0.98 (p<0.01) for all the compounds. The uncertainty of the diffusive sampling method under field conditions, using active sampling as the reference method, has been assessed according to the ISO 13752 requirements. On field relative expanded uncertainty for benzene has been found below 20%.


Subject(s)
Air/analysis , Benzene/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Adsorption , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Temperature , Time Factors
3.
Environ Monit Assess ; 149(1-4): 411-7, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18575955

ABSTRACT

A diffusive sampling method for the determination of gaseous acetic and formic acids, using a radial symmetry diffusive sampler, has been optimised for a 7-day exposure time in this study. Sampling rate determinations were performed on data obtained from a dynamic exposure chamber, simulating the indoor conditions of an empty, closed, room, at room temperature and minimal wind speed. Analysis has been performed by means of ion chromatography. The sampling rates for formic acid concentrations of 128 microg m(-3) and 1248 microg m(-3) were determined to be 91.2 +/- 3.9 ml min(-1) and 111.6 +/- 2.8 ml min(-1), respectively. The acetic acid sampling rate was independent of the concentration in the range 160 microg m(-3)-1564 microg m(-3), and amounted to 97.3 +/- 3.1 ml min(-1). Experimentally determined sampling rates showed deviations of 3% for acetic acid, and 3-21% for formic acid, in relation to theoretically derived values. The blank values were as low as 1.69 +/- 0.07 microg for formic acid and 1.21 +/- 0.14 microg for acetic acid, and detection limits lower than 0.5 microg m(-3) could be achieved, which is an improvement of 98-99% compared to previously validated diffusive sampling methods. This study describes the first step of an extended validation program in which the applicability of these types of samplers for the measurement of organic acids will be validated and optimised for the environmental conditions typical for museum showcases.


Subject(s)
Acetic Acid/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Formates/analysis , Diffusion , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Humans
4.
J Environ Monit ; 10(8): 941-50, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18688463

ABSTRACT

The need to collect data representative of overall urban pollution is all-important in order to monitor the population exposure. High spatial resolution monitoring using diffusive samplers allows studying of the urban pollutant distribution, thus enabling deeper investigation of their generation and diffusion mechanisms. Nevertheless, such a monitoring campaign has a certain cost. In this study we point out how to find the best compromise between the number of necessary measurements and the affordable costs for monitoring campaigns. We also describe an innovative method for the proper design of a fixed urban monitoring network by means of preliminary high spatial resolution campaigns using diffusive samplers. Four European capital cities (Dublin, Madrid, Paris and Rome) were monitored six times, each time for seven days. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX) and NO(2) concentrations were measured at 146 sites in Dublin, 293 in Madrid, 339 in Paris and 290 in Rome. Multiscale grids have been drawn which ranged in mesh size from 500 m to 2 km. The statistical processing of data produced a twofold result: the creation of isoconcentration maps with geostatistical procedures, and an algorithm aimed at locating the minimum number of sampling sites where the fixed monitoring stations should be placed. Average urban levels estimated on the basis of these selected sites differ by less than 8% from those calculated on the whole populations of the sampled points. The aim of this work is to investigate how far the resolution of a monitoring campaign of urban pollution by diffusive sampling can be reduced, thus making the monitoring less expensive in terms of human and financial resources, while preserving the same quality of the results that could be achieved with a higher resolution. We found that there is no significant loss of information when the resolution of the monitoring grid for BTEX is lowered to a mesh size of 1.85 km, that is a sampling site each 3.4 km(2), and that the minimum number of sampling sites to be used is N = 0.29 A, where A is the urban surface to be monitored (in km(2)). As the spatial distribution of NO(2) is less sensitive to the distance from the emission source than that of BTEX, this relationship could be retained as a valid lower limit for the mesh grid size also for NO(2) monitoring.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/chemistry , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Cities , Hydrocarbons/analysis , Nitrogen Dioxide/analysis , Quality Control , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL