Different responses to preoperative chemotherapy for invasive lobular and invasive ductal breast carcinoma.

AIM: Preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) is used in primary breast cancer, to facilitate breast conservative surgery (BCS). Clinical and pathologic responses are important prognostic parameters. Biologic markers are needed to individualize treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-five patients with breast carcinoma were treated with PCT, followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy. Clinical response and pathological complete response (pCR), biological markers and type of surgery were compared between invasive ductal (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). RESULTS: Overall response (OR) for IDC was 75% compared to 50% for ILC (P=0.0151). Pathological CR was 15% for IDC and 0% for ILC (P=0.0066). Fifty-six percent of the responding patients had BCS, in contrast with 16% of the non-responders. BCS was performed in 50% of patients with IDC, in 38% of the patients with ILC. Salvage surgery was more necessary in ILC (19%) compared to IDC (4%) (P=0.0068). Patients with ILC were more frequently ER-positive and HER-2 negative than patients with IDC. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and pathological responses are lower in ILC compared to IDC. After PCT, patients with large ILC should preferably be offered mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. However, PCT still remains valuable to evaluate tumor response and biologic factors in vivo.

Optimal combination therapy with Navoban (tropisetron) in patients with incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The Belgian Navoban Group.

Even with the availability of potent and selective serotonin antagonists, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting remain a major problem for many patients. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of combination therapy based on Navoban (tropisetron) in patients who had incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting induced by chemotherapy when using Navoban as a single antiemetic agent. In their first chemotherapy course, 1072 patients planned to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy were treated with 5 mg Navoban once daily. To evaluate three treatments additional to the recommended 5 mg once-daily Navoban regimen during Course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of Course 1, a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was employed. Of these patients, 445 were centrally randomised to receive an additional dose of open-label dexamethasone (Day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; Days 2-6, 8 mg p.o.) and/or open-label alizapride (Day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg p.o.; Days 2-6, 4 x 5 mg p.o.) and/or double-blind Navoban--that is, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily or placebo. Complete response rates during Course 1 (CRR, no nausea and no vomiting) were, for Day 1, 72% and for Days 1-6, 48%. More complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added during Course 2, both on Day 1 (76% vs. 66%, p = 0.020) and on Days 1-6 (50% vs. 34%, p = 0.0004).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dose-finding study of tropisetron in cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these two studies was to define the optimal therapeutic dose of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron (Navoban, ICS 205-930) in cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In two multicentre, dose-finding studies of tropisetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis, cancer patients naïve to chemotherapy or who had not vomited previously were randomly assigned to tropisetron 5, 10, 20 or 40 mg (study I, 143 patients) or 2 or 5 mg (study II, 74 patients), administered as a single intravenous dose over 15 minutes just before the start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: In study I total control of acute symptoms (no nausea and no vomiting) was achieved in, respectively, 66%, 50%, 64% and 50% in the 5-, 10-, 20- and 40-mg groups of patients. A total absence of vomiting alone was seen in, respectively, 71%, 51%, 61% or 58% of patients. None of the differences were statistically significant. In study II there was total acute control in 57% of patients in the 2-mg group and 63% in the 5-mg group (p = NS). Total or major control of vomiting (< or = 2 emetic episodes) was the primary endpoint in study II and was seen in 68% of patients for the 2-mg and 86% for the 5-mg group (p = 0.055). In this study failures ( > 3 vomiting) were rescued with a second infusion of tropisetron (5-mg fixed dose). Three of 8 rescue infusions administered in the 2-mg group prevented further vomiting whereas none of 5 were successful in the 5-mg group during course 1 of chemotherapy. The most frequently reported adverse effects (over all three courses) were headache (6.0% of 217 patients) hypertension (3.7%) and diarrhoea (2.8%). None of the 25 deaths which occurred during the two studies were attributable to tropisetron. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, a single dose of tropisetron provides 24-hour protection against cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting and is well tolerated. These studies do not allow a firm conclusion but suggest that 2 mg may be subtherapeutic and that 5 mg is as effective as higher doses.