Exploring the use of the Swiss medical tariffication codes (TARMED) in the establishment of the frequency of radiodiagnostic examinations.

In population surveys of the exposure to medical X-rays both the frequency of examinations and the effective dose per examination are required. The use of the Swiss medical tariffication system (TARMED) for establishing the frequency of X-ray medical examinations was explored. The method was tested for radiography examinations performed in 2008 at the Lausanne University Hospital. The annual numbers of radiographies determined from the "TARMED" database are in good agreement with the figures extracted from the local RIS (Radiology Information System). The "TARMED" is a reliable and fast method for establishing the frequency of radiography examination, if we respect the context in which the "TARMED" code is used. In addition, this billing context provides most valuable information on the average number of radiographs per examination as well as the age and sex distributions. Radiographies represent the major part of X-ray examinations and are performed by about 4,000 practices and hospitals in Switzerland. Therefore this method has the potential to drastically simplify the organisation of nationwide surveys. There are still some difficulties to overcome if the method is to be used to assess the frequency of computed tomography or fluoroscopy examinations; procedures that deliver most of the radiation dose to the population. This is due to the poor specificity of "TARMED" codes concerning these modalities. However, the use of CT and fluoroscopy installations is easier to monitor using conventional survey methods since there are fewer centres. Ways to overcome the "TARMED" limitations for these two modalities are still being explored.

Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripters: differences in fragmentation efficiency in vitro.

In a comparative assessment of the stone fragmentation efficacy of different piezoelectric lithotripters 72 human gallstones consisting of 24 sets of 3 stones each were disintegrated in vitro using the Piezolith 2300, the EDAP LT.01, and the Therasonic. On the basis of the maximum diameter the calculi were divided into group A (6-15 mm; n = 3 x 16) and group B (16-25 mm; n = 3 x 8) and were treated by using the maximum energy setting of each lithotripter (Piezolith 2300: setting 4, high power; EDAP LT.01: 95%; Therasonic: setting 7). Shockwave application was terminated when the residual fragments measured < or = 4 mm or after a total number of 6000 pulses. With the Piezolith 2300 all calculi could be disintegrated into fragments < or = 4 mm. In contrast, fragmentation was not successful, even after 6000 applied pulses, in the case of 2 and 6 stones when using EDAP LT.01 and the Therasonic lithotripters, respectively. With the remaining concrements of group A (n = 3 x 11) the fragmentation end point was achieved after a lower number of pulses when the Piezolith 2300 (median, 250 pulses; range, 50-500 pulses) was used than with the EDAP LT.01 (1000; 150-2500; p < 0.01) and the Therasonic lithotripters (2750; 750-5500; p < 0.01). Similar results were obtained for group B (n = 3 x 6): the Piezolith 2300 required fewer pulses (200; 100-1250) than the EDAP LT.01 (1000; 500-1000; p < 0.05) and the Therasonic (2000, 500-4000; p < 0.05) units.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)