ABSTRACT
Background: It is theorized that the lack of a synovial lining after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) contributes to slow ligamentization and possible graft failure. Whether graft maturation and incorporation can be improved with the use of a scaffold requires investigation. Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of wrapping an ACL autograft with an amnion collagen matrix and injecting bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), quantify the cellular content of the BMAC samples, and assess 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 40 patients aged 18 to 35 years who were scheduled to undergo ACLR were enrolled in a prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial with 2 arms based on graft type: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB; n = 20) or hamstring (HS; n = 20). Participants in each arm were randomized into a control group who underwent standard ACLR or an intervention group who had their grafts wrapped with an amnion collagen matrix during graft preparation, after which BMAC was injected under the wrap layers after implantation. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mapping/processing yielded mean T2* relaxation time and graft volume values at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Participants completed the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and pain visual analog scale. Statistical linear mixed-effects models were used to quantify the effects over time and the differences between the control and intervention groups. Adverse events were also recorded. Results: No significant differences were found at any time point between the intervention and control groups for BTB T2* (95% CI, -1.89 to 0.63; P = .31), BTB graft volume (95% CI, -606 to 876.1; P = .71), HS T2* (95% CI, -2.17 to 0.39; P = .162), or HS graft volume (95% CI, -11,141.1 to 351.5; P = .28). No significant differences were observed between the intervention and control groups of either graft type on any patient-reported outcome measure. No adverse events were reported after a 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: In this pilot study, wrapping a graft with an amnion collagen matrix and injecting BMAC appeared safe. MRI T2* values and graft volume of the augmented ACL graft were not significantly different from that of controls, suggesting that the intervention did not result in improved graft maturation. Registration: NCT03294759 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears in the throwing elbow are classified according to grade and location using magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). However, the frequency of each tear type and the association to age, competition level, and radiographic findings in adolescent baseball pitchers are unknown. PURPOSES: The primary purpose of this study was to use MRA to characterize the severity, location, and UCL tear type in adolescent pitchers. The second aim was to describe the relationship between the UCL tear type and age, competition level, and plain radiographic findings. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Records of adolescent pitchers with a UCL tear treated by the senior author between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. MRA scans were reviewed and tears were classified according to the Joyner-Andrews classification. Low-grade partial tears are classified as type I, high-grade partial tears as type II, complete full-thickness tears as type III, and tear pathology in >1 region in the UCL as type IV. Each type of tear also has a location designated at the midsubstance, ulna (U), or humerus (H). Patient characteristics, competition level, and associated plain radiographic abnormalities were recorded. Univariate analyses were performed to examine the relationships between tear types and age, competition level, and plain radiographic findings. RESULTS: A total of 200 adolescent pitchers (mean ± SD age, 17.2 ± 1.5 years) with MRA scans were reviewed. Type II-H (n = 62), type II-U (n = 51), and type III-U (n = 28) were the most common tear types observed. Type II tears comprised 64.5% of adolescent UCL tears, with type II-H being the most common. Plain radiographs were abnormal in 32% of patients, with calcifications (10.5%) and olecranon osteophytes (12.5%) being the most common findings. There were no significant relationships between tear type and age (P = .25), competition level (P = .23), or radiographic abnormalities (P = .75). CONCLUSION: Humeral-sided high-grade partial tears were the most common tear type in adolescent pitchers. There was no relationship between UCL tear type and age competition level, and plain radiographic abnormalities.
Subject(s)
Baseball , Collateral Ligament, Ulnar , Collateral Ligaments , Elbow Joint , Adolescent , Collateral Ligament, Ulnar/diagnostic imaging , Collateral Ligaments/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Elbow Joint/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC) are being used clinically as therapeutic agents for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of BMC and PRP on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis up to 24 months after injection. It was hypothesized that patients receiving BMC would have better sustained outcomes than those receiving PRP. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 90 participants aged between 18 and 80 years with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) were randomized into 2 study groups: PRP and BMC. Both groups completed the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire before and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after a single intra-articular injection of leukocyte-rich PRP or BMC. A linear mixed-effects model was performed to quantify the effects over time and the difference between the groups. This model has the random effect for time to assess the extent in which the change over time differs from one person to another. RESULTS: An overall 84 patients completed questionnaires from baseline to 12 months; however, 17 patients (n = 9; PRP group) were lost to follow-up at 18 months and 25 (n = 13; PRP group) at 24 months. There were no statistically significant differences in IKDC (P = .909; 95% CI, -6.26 to 7.03) or WOMAC (P = .789; 95% CI, -6.26 to 4.77) scores over time between the groups. Both groups had significantly improved IKDC (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.275-0.596) and WOMAC (P = .001; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.13) scores from baseline to 24 months after the injection. These improvements plateaued at 3 months and were sustained for 24 months after the injection, with no difference between PRP and BMC at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of osteoarthritis, PRP and BMC performed similarly out to 24 months. BMC was not superior to PRP. REGISTRATION: NCT03289416 (ClincalTrials.gov identifier).