Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 14(4): e291-e300, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325547

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A 3-dimensinal (3D) stereoscopic camera system developed by .decimal was commissioned and implemented into the clinic to improve the efficiency of clinical electron simulations. Capabilities of the camera allowed simulations to be moved from the treatment vault into any room with a flat surface that could accommodate patient positioning devices, eliminating the need for clinical patient setup timeslots on the treatment machine. This work describes the process used for these simulations and compares the treatment parameters determined by the system to those used in delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Decimal3D scanner workflow consisted of: scanning the patient surface; contouring the treatment area; determining gantry, couch, collimator, and source-to-surface distance (SSD) parameters for en face entry of the beam with sufficient clearance at the machine; and ordering custom electron cutouts when needed. Transparencies showing the projection of in-house library cutouts at various clinical SSDs were created to assist in choosing an appropriate library cutout. Data from 73 treatment sites were analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of the scanner-determined beam parameters for each treatment delivery. RESULTS: Clinical electron simulations for 73 treatment sites, predominately keloids, were transitioned out of the linear accelerator (LINAC) vault using the new workflow. For all patients, gantry, collimator, and couch parameters, along with SSD and cone size, were determined using the Decimal3D scanner with 57% of simulations using library cutouts. Tolerance tables for patient setup were updated to allow differences of 10, 20, and 5° for gantry, collimator, and couch, respectively. Approximately 7% of fractions (N = 181 total fractions) were set up outside of the tolerance table based on physician direction during treatment. This reflects physician preference to adjust the LINAC rather than patient position during treatment setup. No scanner-derived plan was untreatable because of cutout shape inaccuracy or clearance issues. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical electron simulations were successfully transitioned out of the LINAC vault using the Decimal3D scanner without loss of setup accuracy, as measured through machine parameter determination and electron cutout shape.


Subject(s)
Electrons , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Electrons/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy Dosage , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods
2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 91(2): 215-219, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37489962

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Radiation therapy is a promising modality for treating keloids after surgical excision. However, it is currently not standard practice among physicians because of concern surrounding the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers, especially among pediatric patients. There is minimal research assessing the complications for radiation therapy in keloid management. AIM: The goal of this study was to determine radiation oncologists' perspectives about the utility and appropriateness of radiation therapy for keloid management in both adult and pediatric patients. This study also aimed to characterize radiation modality, dose, fractionation, and secondary complications observed by providers. METHODS: An electronic survey was delivered to 3102 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. The survey subjects were radiation oncologists who are currently practicing in the United States. Rates of responses were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 114 responses from practicing radiation oncologists were received. Of these, 113 providers (99.1%) supported radiation therapy for keloid management in adults, whereas only 54.9% supported radiation therapy for pediatric patients. Of 101 providers that treated adults in the past year, the majority used external beam: electrons (84.2%), applied 3 fraction regimens (54.4%), and delivered radiation within 24 hours postexcision (45.5%). In pediatric patients, only 42 providers reported treating at least 1 patient. The majority used electron beam radiation (76.2%), applied 3 faction regimens (65%), and delivered radiation on the same day of keloid excision (50.0%) The main concern when treating pediatric patients were risk of secondary malignancy (92.1%). CONCLUSION: Although radiation therapy appears to be a widely accepted adjuvant treatment option for adults with keloids, the use of radiation therapy for pediatric patients is less widely accepted because of concerns regarding secondary malignancy. The findings suggest additional studies need to be carried out to assess the risk of those complications.


Subject(s)
Keloid , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced , Physicians , Humans , Adult , Child , Radiation Oncologists
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 75(8): 2455-2465, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35817711

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide a critical overview of current radiation modalities for keloid management. BACKGROUND: Despite multimodal therapies, keloids that can develop following injury are poorly controlled. A number of studies have suggested that post-excisional radiation therapy can reduce rates of keloid recurrence. However, existing reports span multiple radiation modalities, including brachytherapy, electron beam radiation, and photon radiation. In this review, we describe the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used radiation techniques and highlight their efficacy in keloid management. RESULTS: Electron beam radiation and high-dose rate brachytherapy are the two most commonly used modalities for adjuvant radiotherapeutic management of keloids and can provide effective keloid control but may be suited for different kinds of keloid growth patterns. Increasing biologically equivalent dose (BED) likely improves rates of control, though the clinical significance of this finding remains to be elucidated. Though radiation treatments are associated with acute and chronic side effects, the risk of developing a secondary malignancy is minimal. CONCLUSIONS: While radiation therapy is a promising modality for treating keloids, more studies of a prospective, randomized nature are needed to standardize its utility.


Subject(s)
Keloid , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Keloid/etiology , Keloid/radiotherapy , Keloid/surgery , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Gastrointest Oncol ; 6(5): 524-33, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26487947

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and treatment characteristics and outcomes in locally advanced anal cancer, a potentially curable disease, in patients referred from a public or private hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 112 anal cancer patients from a public and a private hospital who received definitive chemoradiotherapy at the same cancer center between 2004 and 2013. Tumor stage, radiotherapy delay, radiotherapy duration, and unplanned treatment breaks ≥10 days were compared using t-test and χ(2) test. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and colostomy free survival (CFS) were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models for OS and DFS were developed. RESULTS: The follow-up was 14.9 months (range, 0.7-94.8 months). Public hospital patients presented with significantly higher clinical T stage (P<0.05) and clinical stage group (P<0.05), had significantly longer radiotherapy delays (P<0.05) and radiotherapy duration (P<0.05), and had more frequent radiation therapy (RT) breaks ≥10 days (P<0.05). Three-year OS showed a marked trend in favor of private hospital patients for 3-year OS (72.8% vs. 48.9%; P=0.171), 3-year DFS (66.3% vs. 42.7%, P=0.352), and 3-year CFS (86.4% vs. 68.9%, P=0.299). Referral hospital was not predictive of OS or DFS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Public hospital patients presented at later stage and experienced more delays in initiating and completing radiotherapy, which may contribute to the trend in poorer DFS and OS. These findings emphasize the need for identifying clinical and treatment factors that contribute to decreased survival in low socioeconomic status (SES) populations.

5.
Head Neck ; 30(11): 1422-30, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18767179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Plate osteosynthesis is a widely used technique in head and neck reconstructive surgery. The objective of this study was to determine whether postoperative chemoradiotherapy, which was recently introduced for high-risk head and neck cancer, affects plate and osteosynthesis related complications. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients, who had undergone plate osteosynthesis for mandibular reconstruction between October 2003 and September 2006, were included in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) surgery alone (n = 19), (2) surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (n = 14), and (3) surgery with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 19). Outcome measures included any bone or plate related complications. RESULTS: The plate and osteosynthesis related complications occurred in 10.5% of patients in surgery-alone group, 28.6% in surgery with postoperative radiation group, and 63.2% in surgery with postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy group. The differences in the complication rates among these 3 groups were statistically significant (p = .003). In univariate analysis, postoperative radiation (p = .007) and concurrent chemotherapy (p = .003) were found to be significantly associated with complications. In multivariate analysis, only concurrent chemotherapy was found to be statistically significant (p = .002) with odds ratio of 7.72. CONCLUSION: Postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly increases plate and osteosynthesis related complications in oral cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Bone Plates/adverse effects , Carcinoma/complications , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Carcinoma/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Mandible/surgery , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/complications , Mouth Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Postoperative Period , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Flaps , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...