Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
BMJ Open Qual ; 11(1)2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105549

ABSTRACT

Low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) is standard of care for mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and has been shown to improve outcomes in the general mechanically ventilated population. Despite these improved outcomes, in clinical practice the LTVV standard of care is often not met. We aimed to increase compliance with LTVV in mechanically ventilated patients in 10 intensive care units at 3 hospitals within the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Critical Care Medicine. Four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented to improve compliance with LTVV. Initial compliance rates of 40.6%-60.1% improved to 91%-96% by the end of the fourth PDSA cycle. The most impactful step in the intervention was providing education and giving responsibility of selecting the tidal volume to the respiratory therapist. The overall intervention resulted in improved compliance with LTVV that has been sustained for multiple years after our active PDSA cycles.


Subject(s)
Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Lung , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Tidal Volume
2.
Respir Care ; 54(11): 1453-61, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19863828

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current strategies for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) favor the use of quantitative methods; however, semi-quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirates are still commonly used. METHODS: The microbiological results of patients with suspected VAP who had both quantitative cultures with non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and semi-quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirate obtained within 24 hours of each other were retrospectively reviewed and compared, using a quantitative threshold of >or=10(4) colony-forming units/mL as a reference standard. RESULTS: 256 patients with paired cultures were identified. Concordance between endotracheal aspirate (any growth of pathogens) and non-bronchoscopic BAL was complete in 58.2% and completely discordant in 23.8%. The sensitivity and specificity of endotracheal aspirate were 65.4% and 56.1%, which improved to 81.2% and 61.9% when antibiotic management decisions were considered in the analysis. Twenty-six patients had endotracheal aspirate cultures that were falsely negative for pathogens, with 61.5% of these patients demonstrating growth of non-fermenting Gram-negative rods or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on non-bronchoscopic BAL. Overall, 45 patients (17.5%) among the entire cohort had false positive endotracheal aspirate cultures, with 19 of these patients (42.2%) demonstrating growth of non-fermenting Gram-negative rods or MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: Semi-quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirate are poorly concordant with quantitative cultures obtained via non-bronchoscopic BAL. Although the performance of endotracheal aspirate improves when antibiotic treatment is considered, guiding therapy on the basis of semi-quantitative cultures may still result in failure to identify potentially multiple-drug-resistant pathogens, and would also tend to promote excessive antibiotic usage. Our data support the use of quantitative cultures in diagnosing VAP.


Subject(s)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Trachea/microbiology , Aged , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/microbiology , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Suction
3.
Respir Care ; 54(7): 861-7, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19558737

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory therapist (RT) driven protocols decrease ventilator days and resource utilization in the intensive care unit (ICU). Protocols have been studied in non-ICU settings, but their effect on mortality has been incompletely studied. METHODS: In our neurosurgery step-down, trauma/surgery step-down, and trauma/surgery general units we initiated an RT-driven evaluate-and-treat protocol that included a standardized, quantitative, RT-driven patient-assessment scale and protocolized interventions. Before and after initiation of the protocol we collected data on non-ICU patients at risk for pulmonary complications. RESULTS: The patient groups before (n = 2,230) and after (n = 2,805) protocol initiation were well matched in age, sex, Charlson score, and admitting service. Most of the patients, whether assessed by a physician or an RT, were deemed to have low risk of pulmonary complications and did not require any respiratory treatments. The number of respiratory treatments increased after protocol initiation, but the patients who received respiratory treatments after protocol initiation had shorter ICU stay and hospital stay, and lower total hospital costs than those who received respiratory treatments before protocol initiation. There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower mortality after protocol initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our RT-evaluate-and-treat protocol for non-ICU surgery patients was associated with more patients receiving respiratory treatments but decreased ICU and hospital stay and lower total hospital costs. Routine RT-driven assessment of non-ICU patients may reduce pulmonary complications in high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Complications , Respiratory Therapy , Adult , Aged , Clinical Protocols , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Chest ; 127(6): 2139-50, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15947332

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Impaired leukocyte function in patients with serious infections may increase mortality. Granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) broadly activates peripheral monocytes and neutrophils. We performed a clinical trial of GM-CSF in septic, hemodynamically stable patients to see whether GM-CSF treatment improved leukocyte function and mortality. DESIGN: Randomized, unblinded, placebo-controlled, prospective study. SETTING: A 600-bed academic tertiary care center with a 120-bed ICU census with a high proportion of immunocompromised, solid-organ transplant recipients. PATIENTS: Forty adult patients with infections meeting the criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome but without hemodynamic instability or shock. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with sepsis and a documented infection were randomized to a 72-h infusion of GM-CSF (125 microg/m2) or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: GM-CSF infusion caused the up-regulation of the beta2-integrin adhesion molecule CD11b and the appearance of the activated ("sticky" or "avid") form of the molecule on circulating neutrophils and monocytes. CD11b density and avidity increases in response to the administration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha were blunted prior to treatment in these patients with serious infection. GM-CSF partially repaired this blunted response on both monocytes and neutrophils. It also caused the down-regulation of the adhesion molecule L-selectin on neutrophils and the up-regulation of human leukocyte antigen on monocytes. These changes were consistent with a broad activation of the circulating leukocyte pool. Although mortality and organ failure scores were similar in both groups, infection resolved significantly more often in patients receiving GM-CSF. CONCLUSIONS: GM-CSF infusion up-regulated the functional markers of inflammation on circulating neutrophils and monocytes and was associated with both the clinical and microbiological resolution of infection. There was no detectable exacerbation of sepsis-related organ failure or other deleterious side effects with the administration of this proinflammatory agent to patients with serious infections.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Leukocytes/drug effects , Monocytes/drug effects , Sepsis/drug therapy , Sepsis/mortality , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Flow Cytometry , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Leukocytes/cytology , Male , Middle Aged , Monocytes/cytology , Probability , Prospective Studies , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Sepsis/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/analysis , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/drug effects , Up-Regulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...