Local recurrence after ductal carcinoma in situ breast conserving treatment. Analysis of 195 cases.

PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ overall prognosis is excellent, but after breast conserving surgery, with or without radiotherapy, local recurrences can lead to locoregional or distant evolution and death. However, there are few data on optimal local recurrences treatment and long-term impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 195 women treated from 1985 to 1996 by conservative surgery (CS) or conservative surgery followed by radiotherapy (CS+RT), presenting local recurrences, with a 156-month median follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-two out of 195 (42%) local recurrences were non-invasive (in situ) and 113 (58%) invasive. In situ local recurrence was discovered by mammography in 80.5% of the cases versus 47.5% for invasive local recurrence (P=0.0001). Salvage mastectomy was used in 53% of the cases after conservative surgery and 75% after conservative surgery followed by radiotherapy. The axillary nodal involvement rates were 11.8% and 25.8% among 17 and 62 patients with in situ and invasive local recurrences. Among 113 patients with invasive local recurrences and 82 with in situ local recurrences, 19 (16.8%) and three (3.6%) developed metastases, respectively. Among invasive local recurrences, comedocarcinoma subtype was highly predictive of subsequent metastases (32% versus 4.4%, P<0.0007). CONCLUSION: Invasive local recurrence after ductal carcinoma in situ treatment could be a dramatic event, fully changing long-term prognosis. Early mammographic local recurrence diagnosis (if possible still at non-invasive stage) seems essential to avoid or minimize metastatic risk. Mastectomy remains the safest option but, in some cases, a new conservative approach could be discussed.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in younger women: a subgroup of patients at high risk.

BACKGROUND: After breast conservative treatment (BCT), young age is a predictive factor for recurrence in patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the breast. The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictive factors for recurrence and outcomes in these younger women (under 40 years) treated for pure DCIS. METHODS: From 1974 to 2003, 207 cases were collected in 12 French Cancer Centers. Median age was 36.3 years and median follow-up 160 months. Seventy four (35.8%) underwent mastectomy, 67 (32.4%) lumpectomy alone and 66 (31.9%) lumpectomy plus radiotherapy. RESULTS: 37 recurrences occurred (17.8%): 14 (38%) were in situ and 23 (62%) invasive. After BCT, the overall rate of recurrence was 27% (33% in the lumpectomy plus radiotherapy group vs. 21% in the lumpectomy alone group). Comedocarcinoma subtype (p = 0.004), histological size more than 10 mm (p = 0.011), necrosis (p = 0.022) and positive margin status (p = 0.019) were statistically significant predictive factors for recurrence. The actuarial 15-year rates of local recurrence were 29%, 42% and 37% in the lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy and whole breast radiotherapy and lumpectomy + whole breast radiotherapy with additional boost groups respectively. After recurrence, the 10-year overall survival rate was 67.2%. CONCLUSION: High recurrence rates (mainly invasive) after BCT in young women with DCIS are confirmed. BCT in this subgroup of patients is possible if clear and large margins are obtained, tumor size is under 11 mm and necrosis- and/or comedocarcinoma-free.

[Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Analysis of 882 cases]. / Carcinome canalaire in situ du sein. Analyse de 882 cas.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the results of "current clinical practice" among 882 women treated in nine French Cancer Centers from 1985 to 1995 for pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. METHOD: Median age was 53 years (range 21-87); 177 (20%) patients underwent mastectomy (M), 190 (22%) conservative surgery alone (CS) and 515 (58%) conservative surgery with radiotherapy (CS + RT). RESULTS: The crude 7-year local relapse (LR) rates were 2%, 31% and 13% among the M, CS and CS+RT subgroups (p<0.0001). All four LR after M were invasive as well as 31 (52%) out of 59 and 40 (61%) out of 66 in the CS and CS+RT groups. Distant metastases occurred in 1%, 3% and 1% of the three treatment groups. No LR factors were found in the M group. Among women treated with CS, the 7-year LR rates were 36%, 31% and 30% among women aged 40 or less, 41 to 60 and 61 or more (NS). For women treated by CS+RT, the LR rates in these age subgroups were 33%, 13% and 8%, respectively (p<0.0001). Patients with negative, positive or uncertain margins had 7-year LR rates of 26%, 56% and 29% respectively if treated with CS (p=0.02) and 11%, 23% and 9% if treated with CS+RT (p=0.0008). RT reduced LR rates by 65% in all histological subgroups, but more particularly in comedocarcinoma and mixed cribriform/papillary subgroups. The 7-year rate of contralateral breast cancer was 7%, identical in all subgroups. CONCLUSION: Mastectomy remains the safest treatment for women with DCIS, with a 98% 7-year control rate. After conservative surgery, RT reduces very significantly LR rates, according to the NSABP B-17 and EORTC 10853 randomized trial results. The RT benefit is present in all clinical/histological subgroups, but its magnitude varies. Young age (<40 years) and incomplete excision are the most important LR risk factors.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast results of conservative and radical treatments in 716 patients.

Until now, less than 5% of the patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been enrolled in clinical trials. Consequently, we have analysed the results of "current practice" among 716 women treated in eight French Cancer Centres from 1985 to 1992: 441 cases (61.6%) corresponded to impalpable lesions, 92 had a clinical size of less than or equal to 2 cm and 70 from 2 to 5 cm; in 113 cases, the size was unspecified. Median age was 53.2 years (range: 21-87 years). 145 patients underwent mastectomy (RS) and 571 conservative surgery (CS) without (136) or with (435) radiotherapy (CS+RT). The mean histological tumour sizes in these three groups were 25.6, 8.2, 14.8 mm, respectively (P<0.0001). After a 91-month median follow-up, local recurrence (LR) rates were 2.1, 30.1 and 13.8% in the RS, CS and CS +RT groups, respectively (P=0.001); LR were invasive in 59 and 60% in the CS and CS+RT groups, respectively. In these groups, the 8-year LR rates were 31.3 and 13.9%, respectively (P=0.0001). Nodal recurrence occurred in 3.7 and 1.8% in the CS and CS+RT groups. Metastases rates were 1.4, 4.4 and 1.4% in the RS, CS and CS+RT groups. Among the 60 cases of invasive LR, in CS and CS+RT groups 19% developed metastases. After multivariate analysis, we did not identify any significant LR risk factor in the CS group, whereas young age (<40 years) and incomplete excision were significant in the CS+RT group (P=0.012 and P=0.02, respectively).

[Treatment of breast cancer after 70 years of age. Report of 1143 cases]. / Le traitement du cancer du sein après 70 ans. A propos de 1143 cas.

STUDY AIM: Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in women, increasing in frequency with the elderly. In Europe, a third of new breast cancers occur in women over 70 years of age. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the tumoural lesions and therapeutic results in a female population over 70, treated in the same medical centre over a 15-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1978 to 1992, 1,143 female patients aged 70 or over were treated for a unilateral breast cancer without metastases and followed-up during a mean 6-year period. The initial treatment was surgical in 1,012 patients: radical mastectomy in 95% of the cases with axillary node dissection in 97.6%. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed in 289 patients and adjuvant treatment with Tamoxifen in 411 patients. The results were compared with those obtained in 2,947 patients aged 50 to 69, treated during the same period in the same medical centre. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate in women 70 and over was 80% vs 85.5% in women aged 50 to 69 (P < 0.000001). The same rate of loco-regional recurrences and metastases occurred in both populations. In the patients who initially underwent surgery, after multivariate analysis according to the Cox model, the prognosis factors (similar to those observed in the group of younger women) were: the number of involved nodes (P = 0.000001), the clinical size of the tumour (P = 0.00001), the histological grade (P = 0.01), and the estrogen receptors (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the treatment was focused on surgery complemented with adjuvant radiotherapy according to node invasion and adjuvant hormonotherapy according mostly to hormonal receptors. However, the complete treatment could not be applied to all cases: only 50% of patients with node involvement were irradiated. The 5-year survival rate lower than that of younger patients may be attributed to incomplete adjuvant treatment. Specific controlled trials taking into account quality of life had to be undertaken in elderly patients in order to adjust the treatment in relation with the patients' age and physiological condition.

Cancer of the uterine cervix: sensitivity and specificity of serum Cyfra 21.1 determinations.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of serum Cyfra 21.1 assay for the monitoring of patients with uterine cervix cancer. METHODS: Pre-treatment sera and complete follow-up of the patients were available for SCC and Cyfra 21.1 for 79 patients Another group of 50 patients was studied to evaluate the specificity, sensitivity, negative or positive predictive values of the markers. The cut-off value for Cyfra 21.1 (1.1 ng/ml) was established by ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: A positive or negative concordance between SCC and Cyfra 21.1 was observed in 65.8% of the cases. Positive SCC and negative Cyfra 21.1 were found in 22.8% of the sera, while the inverse was observed in 11.4% of the cases. The mean concentrations of SCC and Cyfra 21.1 were correlated to FIGO stages, with Cyfra 21.1 being elevated in 100% of stages III and IV. Cyfra 21.1 was also correlated with the extension of the cancer, and to the presence of metastases. The mean concentrations of both markers were significantly higher in the sera of patients with constant progression (P < or = 0.0019). Analysis of 186 results from 91 patients followed-up with a median of 3.29 years showed a sensitivity of 89.5% for Cyfra 21.1, 75.0% for SCC, and a specificity of 86.4% and 99.1%, respectively. The positive predictive values were 91.9% for Cyfra 21.1 and 98.3% for SCC, and the negative predictive values 92.7% and 85.2%, respectively. Median lead times, calculated from the records of 18 selected patients with complete resection of the tumour, were found to be 60 days for Cyfra 21.1 and 50 days for SCC (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In cervical cancer Cyfra 21.1 is very well-correlated to the tumour burden and the extent of the disease. In the case of recurrence, this marker rises more often than SCC. We therefore propose the use of Cyfra 21.1 for the monitoring of cervical cancer.