Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
3.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 50(1): 16-22, ene. 2018. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-172627

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Determinar la utilidad del diagnóstico precoz de la enfermedad de Lyme (EL) en los Centros de Atención Primaria (CAP) empleando el ELISA como técnica de cribado serológico. Métodos: Se realiza un estudio retrospectivo (2006-2013) consistente en la determinación mediante ELISA de la seropositividad a Borrelia de 2.842 personas consideradas en riesgo de padecer EL. Se estudia la relación entre el hábitat y la zona de residencia de las personas con seropositividad a Borrelia, según la procedencia de las muestras (CAP/Hospital). Resultados: El 15,2% de los sueros resultaron positivos frente a Borrelia spp. La seropositividad fue significativamente superior en las muestras remitidas desde los CAP que desde el Hospital y en los habitantes del rural y la montaña frente al área urbana y la meseta. El porcentaje de seropositividad se incrementó con el transcurso de los años. Los médicos de Atención Primaria detectaron mayor porcentaje de enfermos de Lyme en Fase I y tras la instauración del tratamiento no se observaron secuelas. Conclusiones: El papel del médico de atención primaria es primordial en el diagnóstico precoz de la EL, constatándose un mayor porcentaje de seropositivos entre las muestras remitidas desde los CAP con predominio del diagnóstico en Fase I de enfermedad y la resolución sin secuelas. La detección de anticuerpos específicos frente a Borrelia, mediante ELISA, es una prueba útil para el cribado de pacientes en riesgo de EL (AU)


Objective: The main aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of an early diagnosis of Lyme disease (LD) in Primary Health Care Centres (PHCC) using the ELISA test as serological screening technique. Methods: A retrospective study (2006-2013) was performed in order to determine the anti-Borrelia seropositivity in 2,842 people at risk of having LD. The possible relationship between the environment and the area of residence with anti-Borrelia seropositivity was also studied according to the origin of the specimens (PHCC/Hospital). Results: Overall, 15.2% of samples were positive to Borrelia spp. Seropositivity was significantly higher in samples sent by PHCC doctors than those sent by Hospital doctors. Seropositivity was significantly higher in rural than in urban populations and in those who live in mountainous or flat areas. The percentage of seropositivity has increased over the years. Conclusions: The role of the PHCC doctor is essential for achieving an early diagnosis of Lyme disease, as a higher percentage of seropositives was detected in samples submitted from PHCC. Furthermore, most early localised LD patients were diagnosed in PHCC, avoiding the appearance of sequelae. Therefore, detection of Borrelia specific antibodies using an ELISA assay is a useful screening test for patients at risk of LD (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Serologic Tests , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Early Diagnosis , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Retrospective Studies , Blotting, Western , Risk Factors
4.
Aten Primaria ; 50(1): 16-22, 2018 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28476293

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of an early diagnosis of Lyme disease (LD) in Primary Health Care Centres (PHCC) using the ELISA test as serological screening technique. METHODS: A retrospective study (2006-2013) was performed in order to determine the anti-Borrelia seropositivity in 2,842 people at risk of having LD. The possible relationship between the environment and the area of residence with anti-Borrelia seropositivity was also studied according to the origin of the specimens (PHCC/Hospital). RESULTS: Overall, 15.2% of samples were positive to Borrelia spp. Seropositivity was significantly higher in samples sent by PHCC doctors than those sent by Hospital doctors. Seropositivity was significantly higher in rural than in urban populations and in those who live in mountainous or flat areas. The percentage of seropositivity has increased over the years. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the PHCC doctor is essential for achieving an early diagnosis of Lyme disease, as a higher percentage of seropositives was detected in samples submitted from PHCC. Furthermore, most early localised LD patients were diagnosed in PHCC, avoiding the appearance of sequelae. Therefore, detection of Borrelia specific antibodies using an ELISA assay is a useful screening test for patients at risk of LD.


Subject(s)
Lyme Disease/blood , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Primary Health Care , Early Diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Health Facilities , Hematologic Tests , Humans , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...