Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
2.
Arch Pediatr ; 13(8): 1112-7, 2006 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16697621

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess asthma control in asthmatic children attending the emergency department and to compare it with that for children with scheduled specialist follow-up. POPULATION AND METHODS: Between September 2002 and September 2003, we included asthmatic children aged 6 to 16 years, attending the emergency department (group U) or pulmonology follow-up appointments (group C) at Necker Hospital, Paris, France. We used the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ), completed by the parents and children aged 10 years and over. RESULTS: We interviewed 156 families and included 144 (92%) in the final analysis (77 in group U). The 2 groups did not differ in age, sex ratio, age at onset and asthma diagnosis and the frequency of asthma attacks. Children in group U received less daily maintenance treatment (P<0.01) but reported more severe asthma (P<0.05). They had also experienced fewer investigations for their asthma (fewer lung function tests P=0.01 and allergy tests P=0.001). The children in group C had better controlled asthma, as assessed by both the children themselves and their parents. They also had fewer problems relating to the behavior, communication and treatment control domains. The assessment of children and parents were similar in all areas except communication. The children considered their communication problems to be more serious than their parents did. Age-related differences were observed, with older children's parents having more difficulties in all domains investigated. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider assessing asthma control in children attending the emergency department. There is clearly an opportunity to improve the quality of asthma education for these children. Clinicians could provide children with a written plan of action for asthma attacks and information about daily self-management. Improving communication between children, their parents and doctors should be considered a key educational project.


Subject(s)
Asthma/rehabilitation , Emergency Service, Hospital , Patient Education as Topic , Adolescent , Child , Family , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Parents/education , Paris , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Arch Pediatr ; 13(3): 238-44, 2006 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16423517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment with beta 2 agonist delivered either by a spacer device or a nebulizer in children with severe or potentially severe acute asthma. METHODS: In this randomized trial, children 4 to 15 years, cared for in the emergency department for severe or potentially severe acute asthma, received 6 times either nebulizations of salbutamol (0.15mg/kg) or puffs of a beta 2 agonist (salbutamol 50 microg/kg or terbutaline 125 microg/kg). The primary outcome was the hospitalization rate. Secondary outcomes included percentage improvement in Bishop score, in PEF, SaO(2), respiratory and heart rates, side effects, length of stay and relapses 10 and 30 days later. RESULTS: Groups did not differ for baseline data. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (nebulizer N=40, spacer N=39) for baseline characteristics before emergency department consultation except for length of acute asthma in the spacer group. Clinical evolution after treatment, hospitalization rate, relapse were similar including the more severe subgroup. In the spacer group, tachycardia was less frequent (P<0.02). The overall length of stay in the emergency department was significantly shorter (148+/-20 vs 108+/-13 min, P<10(-9)). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of beta 2 agonist using a metered-dose inhaler with spacer is an effective alternative to nebulizers for the treatment of children with severe or potentially severe acute asthma in the emergency department. Time gained can be used for asthma education.


Subject(s)
Albuterol/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Asthma/drug therapy , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Inhalation Spacers , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Terbutaline/administration & dosage , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Arch Pediatr ; 12(3): 248-53, 2005 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15734118

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To study the compliance of prescription, the efficacity and the adverse events of oral morphine used in the pediatric emergency department (ED) in traumatic pains. METHOD: This prospective study was conducted in the ED from october 2002 to september 2003. Children aged six months to 16 years with a visual analogic scale (VAS) score higher than 70 or with a traumatic member deformation received oral morphine (0,5 mg/kg). Pain was assessed every 30 minutes using two scales: behavioral observation by the faces scale and objective pain scale (OPS) for children less than five years, behavioral observation by the faces scale and self-report by VAS for children older than five years. The compliance of prescription, the pain scores and the adverse events were studied. RESULTS: Ninety-one children received oral morphine and seventy-four children were studied. Seventy per cent of prescriptions were in accordance with the recommendations. For patients younger than five years a rapid decrease of pain was observed in thirty minutes. The pain's reduction was respectively 79 and 84% with faces scale and OPS when they left ED. For children older than five years, pain's reduction was more important and more rapid when pain assessment was made by nurses than when it was self-reported in the first hour (pain reduction 58,2 and 36,1%). When leaving, pain reduction was the same with the two different assessments. No major adverse event was noted. CONCLUSION: Use of oral morphine in ED is simple, with a few numbers of adverse events. None was severe. Efficiency is correct after 30 to 60 minutes.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain/drug therapy , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Age Factors , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Arm Injuries/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Emergencies , Fractures, Bone/complications , Humans , Infant , Leg Injuries/complications , Morphine/adverse effects , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
5.
Arch Pediatr ; 11(12): 1465-7, 2004 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15596336

ABSTRACT

Limb pain in children is one of the most frequent reasons to refer to the emergency unit. Most often it suggests an orthopaedic, a muscular, a peripheral neurologic or a spinal affection. We report two cases of recurrent limb pains revealing a central nervous system tumor.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pain , Brain Neoplasms/physiopathology , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/physiopathology , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male
7.
Arch Pediatr ; 11(2): 157-61, 2004 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14761740

ABSTRACT

Injuries to the lower extremity are frequent. They present as pain, reduction of joint function, alteration in gait. Most of the orthopaedic emergencies for teenagers are related to trauma. For younger children, a history of recent fall is prevalent but the non traumatic orthopaedic conditions are especially important to investigate when the reported injury is minor or when onset of symptoms is delayed.


Subject(s)
Leg Injuries/complications , Child , Humans , Leg Injuries/diagnosis , Pain/etiology
8.
Arch Pediatr ; 11(1): 70-3, 2004 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14700770

ABSTRACT

Pain concerns more than 50% of the children cared in the emergency unit. After evaluation, it has to be cured with drugs adapted to its level and its origin. Residual pain needs therapeutic adjustment. The goal is to allow the child to restart his activities. A preventive sedation analgesia is necessary when a painful exam is to be performed, either for diagnosis or therapeutic purpose. For this goal ideal analgesics, either for monotherapy or associated, are easily and painlessly administered. They have rapid onset of action, brief half-life, predictable, effective analgesic properties without side effects and they are quickly reversible. These drugs do not exist and every sedation procedure has a risk of hypoxemia. With the human and equipment's investment an emergency department should be able to ensure that procedures are performed in children under sedation with a standard of safety that is similar to general anaesthesia. The main drawback in a well-organised system should be a significant children's rate for which general anaesthesia is preferred.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pain/drug therapy , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/pharmacokinetics , Child , Conscious Sedation/methods , Half-Life , Humans
9.
Arch Pediatr ; 9(8): 774-9, 2002 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12205786

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The treatment of diarrhoea relies on the maintenance or restoration of hydration with maintenance of an adequate nutritional intake. Racecadotril has been shown to reduce the stools output during acute diarrhoea. The present work was aimed at measuring the number of emergency department visits for acute diarrhoea either the children received racecadotril or not. METHOD: Racecadotril and rehydration were compared with rehydration alone in children aged three months to three years who had acute diarrhoea and were evaluated in the emergency department (ED). The primary end point was the number of medical exams during the week after starting treatment. Secondary end points were the number of stools during the first 48 hours, the duration of the diarrhoea and the weight on day 7. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-six children were alternatively randomized to the treated and the control groups. There was no difference for age, degree of dehydration and length of illness before the first visit between the groups. Whatever type of rehydration (oral or i.v.), the treated group had a significant lower number of stools (p < 0.001) and a faster recovery (p < 10(-9)). The children receiving racecadotril needed less additional ED visits for the same episode (p < 0.05). There was no difference for the weight-gain on day 7. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the efficacy of racecadotril as adjuvant therapy to oral and i.v. rehydration in the treatment of acute diarrhoea and a fewer emergency department second visit before recovery.


Subject(s)
Antidiarrheals/pharmacology , Diarrhea/drug therapy , Thiorphan/analogs & derivatives , Thiorphan/pharmacology , Acute Disease , Antidiarrheals/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Dehydration/drug therapy , Dehydration/etiology , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Infant , Male , Thiorphan/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Water-Electrolyte Balance
10.
Arch Pediatr ; 9(2): 117-25, 2002 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11915491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To determine if the addition of ipratropium bromide in the emergency department (ED) for the treatment of childhood asthma reduces rates of hospitalization and relapses for moderate and severe exacerbations. METHODS: Patients were given an oral corticosteroid treatment (2 mg/kg) and received every 20 minutes either three nebulizations with albuterol (0.15 mg/kg) and ipratropium bromide (250 micrograms) or six nebulizations with albuterol alone (control group). The primary end point was the need for hospitalization, additional nebulizations or a relapse during the following week. Secondary end point included the effect of age. RESULTS: One hundred and forty three children, two to 15 years old, were randomized to ipratropium or control groups and 121 were evaluated on day seven. As a whole, the control group was less often hospitalized or in relapse than those treated with three nebulizations of albuterol and ipratropium (17.5% vs 37.9%, p < 0.02). The ipratropium group reached the same result after three additional albuterol nebulizations. The benefit of anticholinergic therapy was observed for children less than six years of age who had a similar rate of success (73.5 vs 75.7%). CONCLUSION: The association of ipratropium bromide to the first three doses of the albuterol protocol for acute asthma did not act as well as six nebulizations of albuterol alone. The effect was age dependent and two to six years old children needed more attention. Nevertheless the hospitalization rate did not support the use of ipratropium compared with repeated albuterol nebulizations.


Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Cholinergic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Ipratropium/therapeutic use , Status Asthmaticus/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic use , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Cholinergic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Ipratropium/administration & dosage , Male , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation
11.
Arch Pediatr ; 8(9): 922-8, 2001 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11582932

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Each year, a quarter of the children younger than 24 months has respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. The morbidity among high-risk infants and the possible association with the development of asthma lead to propose preventive measures whose cost-effectiveness relationship is unknown. The present work was aimed at measuring costs of a first attack of bronchiolitis. METHOD: For children less than two years visited in the emergency department, direct and indirect costs were measured according to the 'Sécurité Sociale' prices. Associated morbidity, the management of care (inpatient versus outpatient), outpatients' outcome two weeks after the visit, socioeconomic data were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred eighty three children have been studied. The length of stay for 40 hospitalizations was 7.6 +/- 4.3 days. Direct costs were 37,200 +/- 22,000 FF for inpatients, and 1286 +/- 633 F for outpatients. For 113 outpatients' families, indirect costs were 49 working days lost. The way the child was looked after and the unemployment rate in the study were similar to data provided by the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies. CONCLUSION: Because of the variability of the hospitalization rate from one setting to another, overall costs of the epidemic cannot be evaluated. For the policymaker, the greatest costs come from the outpatient care. Others studies will be necessary to evaluate the price of future preventive measures.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis/economics , Cost of Illness , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male
12.
Rev Prat ; 51(17): 1914-8, 2001 Nov 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11787224

ABSTRACT

Drugs for pediatric emergencies are useful for respiratory (croup, asthma), cardiologic (hypertensive crisis, acute congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, hypoxic spells), neurologic (seizures), metabolic (dehydration, hypoglycaemia), infectious (meningococcemia) or allergic (anaphylaxis) distresses. Pain management is always important whether to relieve or to prevent the discomfort which would happen during diagnosis or therapeutic procedures.


Subject(s)
Drug Therapy , Emergency Medicine , Pediatrics , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Child , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Diseases/drug therapy
13.
Isr J Med Sci ; 27(11-12): 603-7, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1757230

ABSTRACT

During the period 18 January-28 February 1991, a total of 39 Iraqi modified Scud missiles landed in Israel, most of them in the densely populated Tel Aviv area. There were 23 missile attack alerts. These attacks caused 1,059 cases of injury; there were two deaths and 232 patients were admitted to emergency rooms for injuries directly related to the explosions, only one of which was severe. A survey among 91 of the injured showed that 46.6% of the wounds were caused by glass splinters, 31.1% were blunt contusions, and 22.2% were acute psychological reactions. No case of blast injury was reported. Inappropriate injection of atropine was reported in 230 cases. Acute anxiety was the reason for admission of 544 patients to emergency rooms. Another 40 patients sustained various traumas while rushing to the sealed room. The relatively low number of injured people is striking in view of the density of population in the areas hit. Various explanations are discussed.


Subject(s)
Warfare , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/etiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Atropine/poisoning , Chemical Warfare Agents , Civil Defense/standards , Drug Overdose/epidemiology , Humans , Iraq , Israel/epidemiology , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Wounds and Injuries/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...