Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Muscle Nerve ; 69(3): 325-333, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38158588

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Anecdotally, patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) describe gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) symptoms. We explored the prevalence of GI and GU symptoms and their impact on quality of life (QOL) in people with FSHD compared to healthy household controls. METHODS: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, we emailed a survey exploring GI and GU symptoms to all FSHD Society patient contacts (n = 3507). We invited those with FSHD and unaffected household controls to respond. Non-parametric statistics were used to compare symptom frequency and impact of symptoms between respondents with FSHD and household controls. Within the FSHD group, symptom frequency was assessed relative to measures of disease progression (need for ambulatory or respiratory support). RESULTS: Surveys from 701 respondents (652 with FSHD) ≥18 years old were included in analysis. Those with FSHD had symptoms affecting both GI and GU systems more frequently than controls using ordinal rating of symptom frequency. Within the FSHD group, more advanced disease was associated with increased symptom frequency. QOL was negatively impacted by the GI and GU symptoms. There was no difference between groups in use of medications to treat these symptoms. DISCUSSION: Recognition and treatment of GI and GU symptoms in people with FSHD, particularly those with more advanced disease, could improve QOL. Additional investigation is required to confirm these findings and understand the physiology.


Subject(s)
Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral , Humans , Adolescent , Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral/complications , Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral/diagnosis , Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
J Chiropr Med ; 21(3): 168-176, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35873190

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this descriptive study was to evaluate the presence of telehealth content on chiropractic state board websites compared with websites from the medical and physical therapy professions during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: State board websites for chiropractic, medicine, and physical therapy for each of the 50 United States and the District of Columbia were searched for the word "tele" to determine if there was a link on the homepage for content related to telehealth guidance. If there was none, the homepage was queried for the word "COVID" to determine if there was a link for COVID-19-related guidance. If yes, that linked COVID-19 page was queried for the word "tele." Consensus of 4 of 5 reviewers was sought. Binary results were entered into a separate spreadsheet for each profession (telehealth content easily accessible, yes or no). Easily accessible was defined as information found within 1 or 2 clicks. This search was performed between January 1, 2021, and March 1, 2021. Results: There were 11 of 51 (21%) chiropractic state board websites that provided content regarding telehealth on the main page, 8 of 51 (16%) provided content on a separate COVID-19-related page, and 32 of 51 (63%) did not provide content that was accessible within 1 or 2 clicks. Comparatively, 9 of 51 (18%) medical state board websites provided content regarding telehealth on the main page, 20 of 51 (39%) provided content on a COVID-19-related page, and 22 of 51 (43%) did not provide content that was accessible within 1 or 2 clicks. Lastly, 10 of 51 (20%) physical therapy state board websites provided content regarding telehealth on the main page, 19 of 51 (37%) provided content on a COVID-19-related page, and 22 of 51 (43%) did not provide content that was accessible within 1 or 2 clicks. Conclusion: Telehealth content was more readily available on medical and physical therapy state board websites compared with chiropractic state board websites in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...