Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 12(6): e262-5, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21263367

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Intermittent bolus propofol is an effective agent for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation but requires constant vigilance and dose titration. Magnetic resonance imaging-compatible infusion pumps may make it possible to continuously infuse propofol, achieving a steady level of sedation at a lower total dose. This study investigates total propofol dose, recovery time, and magnetic resonance image quality in children receiving intermittent vs. continuously infused propofol sedation in children undergoing brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging studies. DESIGN: An open-label, prospective, randomized, controlled study. A single-blinded radiologist rated the quality of magnetic resonance images. SETTING: Children's hospital pediatric radiology sedation center. PATIENTS: One hundred seventy children age 1 month to 18 yrs undergoing deep sedation for brain, spine, or both brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging. INTERVENTIONS: After informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 (intermittent) received a propofol bolus of 2-4 mg/kg, followed by repeat boluses of 0.5-2 mg/kg/dose as needed. Group C (continuous) received a bolus of propofol 2-4 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 100 µg/kg/min with 1-mg/kg/dose boluses with drip titration to effect. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient demographics, sedation risk assessment, propofol dose, sedation recovery times, incidence of complications, and quality of the magnetic resonance imaging studies were measured. A total of 170 children were enrolled in the study, with 75 in group C and 95 in group I. Both groups were similar with regard to age, weight, gender, and magnetic resonance imaging study type. Group C required a lesser dose of propofol (132 ± 54 µg/kg/min) compared to (162 ± 74 µg/kg/min) in that required in group I (p = .018). There were no differences between the two groups with regard to quality of the imaging study, recovery time, or incidence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to intermittent bolus dosing, continuous propofol infusion provides lesser dose exposure without impacting recovery time or quality of the magnetic resonance imaging study.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Brain , Conscious Sedation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Propofol/administration & dosage , Spine , Adolescent , Brain/physiopathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Infusion Pumps , Prospective Studies , Radiology Department, Hospital , Recovery of Function , Spine/physiopathology
2.
J Ren Nutr ; 20(6): 408-13, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20430646

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Megestrol acetate (MA) has been used to treat weight loss in pediatric patients with malignancies, cystic fibrosis and HIV/AIDS. We herein report our experience with MA in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Charts were evaluated for clinical, treatment, and laboratory data at six time points: approximately 6 months prior to initiation of MA, at initiation and cessation of MA, and at 2-, 4-, and 8-month follow-up. Anthropometric measurements were corrected for age and sex by conversion to z scores. SETTING: Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients (n = 25) with CKD and poor weight gain. INTERVENTION: Patients were administered MA at initial and tapered doses of 14.4 ± 8.1 mg/kg/d and 10.1 ± 6.5 mg/kg/d, respectively, for 5.4 ± 6.3 months. RESULTS: The study population (n = 25) was 60% male, 16% African American, 72% white, and 12% Hispanic with a mean ± SD age of 8.9 ± 5.4 years. Prior to MA therapy, patients demonstrated a decrease in BMI and poor weight gain. The treatment phase was associated with significant increases in BMI (P < .0001) and weight (P < .0001), which were well sustained at 8-month follow-up (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Patients demonstrated continued increases in height. A single patient exhibited physical adverse side effects (cushingoid features) associated with MA; otherwise, MA was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: MA appears to effectively improve weight gain in pediatric CKD patients with minimal adverse side effects and may therefore serve as a safe, short-term, nutritional strategy.


Subject(s)
Appetite Stimulants/therapeutic use , Kidney Failure, Chronic/pathology , Megestrol Acetate/therapeutic use , Weight Gain , Adolescent , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies , Weight Loss , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...