Fluvoxamine in the treatment of binge-eating disorder: a multicenter placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of binge-eating disorder. Binge-eating disorder is a newly described eating disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating but without purging behaviors. Uncontrolled reports have suggested that serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be effective in treating this disorder. METHOD: Eighty-five outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of binge-eating disorder were randomly assigned to receive either fluvoxamine (N=42) or placebo (N=43) in a 9-week, parallel-group, double-blind, flexible dose (50-300 mg) study at three centers. The primary outcome measures were frequency of binge eating, expressed as log ([binges/week]+1), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale ratings. Secondary measures included the level of response (based on the percentage change in frequency of binges), body mass index, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score. Except for the level of response, the outcome measures were analyzed by random regression methods; the treatment-by-time interaction was the measure of treatment effect. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, fluvoxamine was associated with a significantly greater rate of reduction in the frequency of binges, rate of reduction in CGI severity scores, rate of increase in CGI improvement scores, level of response for patients who completed the 9-week study, and rate of reduction in body mass index. There was no significant difference between placebo and fluvoxamine groups in the rate of decrease in Hamilton depression scale scores. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving fluvoxamine than those receiving placebo discontinued treatment because of an adverse medical event. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial, fluvoxamine was found to be effective according to most outcome measures in the acute treatment of binge-eating disorder.

Medication side effects in anxious patients: negative placebo responses?

The purpose of the present study was to detect any problems among anxious patients in switching from alprazolam to extended release alprazolam. Fifty-four patients with an anxiety disorder, stabilized on alprazolam, entered the study. During the first 2 weeks, all patients took alprazolam as usual. During the second 2 weeks, they all took the same dosage of the extended release formulation. They were evaluated weekly with standard clinical measures and were asked to report any adverse medical events. The clinical measures showed modest, steady improvement over the course of the study. Patients reporting adverse medical events increased from 26% of the sample to 60% after the switch of dosage forms. Most of these events were anxiety-like (48%) or sedative (37%). Patients who developed sedative events took slightly higher mean doses of alprazolam. Patients who developed anxiety-like events had higher baseline scores on the Somatization, Anxiety and Phobia clusters of the SCL-90. The results suggest that more anxious patients confronted with a change of regimen commonly generate anxiety symptoms that they attribute to the medication, i.e., negative placebo responses, perhaps especially if they have a tendency toward somatization. A study designed to sort out pharmacological and psychological effects and further explore the mechanisms at work is indicated.

Comparative clinical profiles of triazolam versus other shorter-acting hypnotics.

The efficacy, safety, and performance of triazolam was compared with those of other shorter-acting hypnotics acting on the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor--zopiclone, zolpidem, midazolam, brotizolam, temazepam, lormetazepam, and loprazolam. In all, 5506 patients participated in 38 clinical and epidemiologic studies, of whom 2462 were treated with triazolam in parallel-design and crossover studies. To provide clinically relevant comparisons, only studies using comparator agents in doses equipotent to the triazolam doses were included. Two general findings emerged. First, "serious" central nervous system side effects, such as excitement and violence, were not demonstrated for any of the hypnotic agents, including triazolam. Other central nervous system side effects, such as depression and irritability, were reported with equal frequencies for all the hypnotics reviewed. Rebound insomnia, reported intermittently with most of these agents, was short-lived and not clinically significant. So-called early morning insomnia was noted only once and does not appear to be a valid clinical entity. Daytime anxiety was not observed in large numbers of triazolam-treated subjects studied, which is contrary to claims that the drug is anxiogenic. Second, a remarkable similarity was found among all of these shorter-acting agents in terms of efficacy, side effects, and performance-related effects. This was particularly of note for zopiclone and zolpidem. Although claims have been made suggesting differences, evaluation of the studies herein showed that these nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics were indistinguishable from triazolam and other benzodiazepine hypnotics in their clinical and pharmacologic activity. Thus, different chemical structures did not a priori predict different clinical profiles when drugs share a similar mechanism of action.

A double-blind placebo-controlled study of fluvoxamine and imipramine in out-patients with primary depression.

1 A double-blind placebo-controlled study of fluvoxamine and imipramine was performed in a group of depressed patients. Twenty-two patients received fluvoxamine (mean dose 101 mg/day), 25 received imipramine (mean dose 127 mg/day) and 22 received placebo. 2 Apart from an increase in the SGOT and SGPT values of four imipramine patients, no statistically significant changes in haematology or urinalysis were judged to be medically relevant. Fluvoxamine exhibited fewer anticholinergic side effects than imipramine. 3 Both fluvoxamine treated patients and imipramine-treated patients exhibited a statistically significant improvement at the end of the 28-day treatment period with respect to the placebo patients, as measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and the Clinical Global Impression Scale. Evaluations of the results of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Profile of Mood States revealed a statistically significant improvement for imipramine patients with respect to placebo at week 4, but not for fluvoxamine patients. It is postulated on the basis of quantitative pharmaco-EEG findings, that the slight superiority of imipramine over fluvoxamine was due to underdosing of the latter.

Fluvoxamine maleate, a serotonergic antidepressant; a comparison with chlorimipramine.

1. Fluvoxamine is a potent serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, with little or no noradrenergic or anticholinergic activity. 2. The results of three studies using an almost identical protocol with a prospectively randomized, double-blind design comparing fluvoxamine and chlorimipramine are presented. 3. In a population of 98 subjects suffering from a variety of depressive conditions, there was a marked improvement over four weeks in both groups. dosage was maintained between 150 and 300 mg per day. 4. There were no changes of clinical importance in vital signs, hematology or biochemistry, but pulse rates increased in the chlorimipramine group. 5. There were fewer concurrent signs and symptoms in the fluvoxamine group, especially those attributable to anticholinergic activity.