Abemaciclib does not increase the corrected QT interval in healthy participants.

Abemaciclib is an orally administered, potent, and selective small molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, approved for advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This study aimed to use an exposure-response approach to investigate the effect of abemaciclib and its active metabolites (M2 and M20) on QTc interval and delay in cardiac repolarization at clinically relevant exposures. This was a single-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study of ascending doses of abemaciclib. Thirty-five healthy participants were administered a single dose of 200-600 mg abemaciclib. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram tracings and pharmacokinetic samples were collected serially pre- and post-dose. The primary objective was to study the relationship between abemaciclib and its active metabolites (M2 and M20) and QTc interval following ascending oral doses of abemaciclib. The secondary objective included evaluating the safety and tolerability of single ascending doses of abemaciclib in healthy participants. Exposure-response analysis demonstrated that there was no significant relationship between placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcF (ΔΔQTcF), abemaciclib, and metabolite plasma concentrations. Additionally, the ΔΔQTcF slopes of abemaciclib, its metabolites, and total analyte concentrations were not statistically different from zero. Single doses of abemaciclib, up to 400 mg, were well-tolerated by healthy participants; however, at the 600 mg dose (three times the highest registered dose), the frequency and severity of treatment-related gastrointestinal events (primarily diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting) increased. In conclusion, single doses of abemaciclib, up to 400 mg, had no statistically or clinically relevant effects on QTc, and abemaciclib was well tolerated up to a dose of 400 mg in this study.

Further Evaluation of Coproporphyrins as Clinical Endogenous Markers for OATP1B.

Coproporphyrins (CP-I and CP-III) in plasma are considered potential markers for assessing liver organic anion-transporting polypeptide transporter OATP1B activity and monitoring OATP1B-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in clinical settings. However, the effect of altered renal clearance (CLrenal ) on CP-I and CP-III plasma exposure has rarely been examined. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to further evaluate CP-I and CP-III as clinical endogenous markers for OATP1B activity and to investigate the impact of CLrenal on DDI assessments for the first time. In this study, 18 healthy participants were recruited to receive RO7049389 (a potential inhibitor of OATP1B) 800 mg twice daily for 6 days and a single dose of pitavastatin (a probe drug of OATP1B) before and after RO7049389 treatment. Plasma concentrations of pitavastatin, CP I, CP III, and the amounts of CP-I and CP-III excreted in urine were measured. Seventeen healthy participants completed the study. After multiple doses of RO7049389, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours of pitavastatin increased 1.95-fold (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-2.41), while for CP-I and CP-III it increased 3.00-fold (90%CI, 2.35-3.82) and 2.84-fold (90%CI, 2.22-3.65), respectively. Concurrently, the CLrenal of CP-I decreased by 31% (90%CI, 23%-39%), and that of CP-III decreased by 70% (90%CI, 61%-77%). In conclusion, CP-I and CP-III in plasma display the potential to be applied as endogenous markers for the evaluation of OATP1B inhibition in clinical trials. While renal transporters contribute significantly to the CLrenal of CP-III, it would be better to investigate the impact of the CLrenal on plasma exposure of CP-III during clinical DDI assessments.

Evaluation of drug interaction potential of zanubrutinib with cocktail probes representative of CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, P-gp and BCRP.

AIM: This study aims to assess the potential effects of zanubrutinib on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and drug transporter proteins using a cocktail probe approach. METHODS: Patients received single oral doses of probe drugs alone and after at least 8 days of treatment with zanubrutinib 160 mg twice daily in a single-sequence study in 18 healthy male volunteers. Simultaneous doses of 10 mg warfarin (CYP2C9) and 2 mg midazolam (CYP3A) were administered on Day 1 and Day 14, 0.25 mg digoxin (P-glycoprotein [P-gp]) and 10 mg rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein [BCRP]) on Day 3 and Day 16, and 20 mg omeprazole (CYP2C19) on Day 5 and Day 18. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated from samples obtained up to 12 h post dose for zanubrutinib; 24 h for digoxin, omeprazole and midazolam; 48 h for rosuvastatin; and 144 h for warfarin. RESULTS: The ratios (%) of geometric least squares means (90% confidence intervals) for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration in the presence/absence of zanubrutinib were 99.80% (97.41-102.2%) for S-warfarin; 52.52% (48.49-56.88%) for midazolam; 111.3% (103.8-119.3%) for digoxin; 89.45% (78.73-101.6%) for rosuvastatin; and 63.52% (57.40-70.30%) for omeprazole. Similar effects were observed for maximum plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Zanubrutinib 320 mg total daily dose had minimal or no effect on the activity of CYP2C9, BCRP and P-gp, but decreased the systemic exposure of CYP3A and CYP2C19 substrates (mean reduction <50%).

A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine Delivered Using Caffeinated Chewing Gum Versus a Marketed Caffeinated Beverage in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

Background: This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics of caffeine delivered using caffeinated chewing gum to that delivered using a marketed caffeinated beverage (instant coffee) in 16 healthy adult volunteers. Materials and Methods: This was a controlled open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study. Caffeinated chewing gum and a serving of instant coffee, each containing ∼50 mg caffeine, were administered with blood samples collected before and up to 24 hours after administration starts. Plasma caffeine levels were analyzed using validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry methodology. Results: There were no statistical differences between the two caffeine products in tmax (p = 0.3308) and ka (p = 0.3894). Although formulated at ∼50 mg caffeine each, mean dose released from chewing gum was ∼18% less than beverage. Dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax was similar between products. Although the criteria were not set a priori and the study was not powered for concluding bioequivalence, the 90% confidence intervals fell within the bioequivalence limit of 80% to 125%. Conclusions: Existing scientific literature on caffeine, based mostly on data from caffeinated beverages, can be leveraged to support the safety of caffeine delivered by chewing gum and current maximum safe caffeine dose advice should be applicable irrespective of delivery method.