Cementation of polyethylene liners into well-fixed metal shells at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty.

Cementing polyethylene liners into well-fixed metal shells at revision total hip arthroplasty is an accepted technique. Previous studies have tested the initial strength of this construct, but none have tested the construct under physiologic and abnormal loading conditions. The current study examines liner-shell performance under these conditions. In addition, this study quantitates whether hand-modified regular liners or liners designed for cementation with integrated cement spacers, which provide an even cement mantle, perform better. Cyclic loads of up to 4000 N for 500,000 cycles followed by 2000 N for 200,000 cycles of edge loading were used. The liners with integrated spacers demonstrated higher lever-out moments and statistically significant increase in tear-out loads.

Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mechanical stability of a fixed-angle blade plate with that of a locking plate in a cadaveric proximal humerus fracture-fixation model subjected to cyclic loading. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether the use of synthetic humerus specimens would replicate significant differences found during cadaveric tests. DESIGN: Mechanical evaluation of constructs in bending and torsion. SETTING: Biomechanical laboratory in an academic medical center. METHODS: Simulated humeral neck fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification 11A3), in matched-pair cadaveric and synthetic specimens underwent fixation using either a 3.5-mm, 90-degree cannulated LC-Angled Blade Plate or a 3.5-mm LCP Proximal Humerus Locking Plate. Cadaveric specimen constructs were cyclically loaded in bending and torsion; synthetic specimens were tested in torsion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Humeral shaft-bending displacements and angular rotations for respective cyclic bending loads and axial torques were recorded and compared at repeated cyclic intervals to evaluate construct loosening. RESULTS: Locking-plate constructs exhibited significantly less loosening than blade-plate constructs for torsional loading in cadaveric specimens (P = 0.036). The two types of constructs performed similarly for torsional loading in synthetic specimens (P = 0.100). Under cyclic, closed-bending load conditions in which the plates served as tension members, both types of constructs performed similarly in cadaveric specimens (P = 0.079). CONCLUSIONS: For simulated humeral neck fractures subjected to cyclic loading, locking-plate constructs demonstrated significantly greater torsional stability and similar bending stability to blade plates in a cadaveric specimen model. In contrast, these same constructs performed similarly with torsional loading when using synthetic humerus specimens. These results indicate potential advantages for locking-plate fixation. They also indicate that the synthetic specimens tested may not be appropriate for evaluating fixation stability in the humeral head, where cancellous bone fixation predominates.

Unstable proximal extraarticular tibia fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of four methods of fixation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical stability of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures reconstructed using a double-plate construct, locking plate system, hybrid external fixator, and single lateral periarticular plate, all from the same manufacturer. DESIGN: Standardized proximal tibial fractures (AO classification 41-A3.2 and A3.3) in synthetic tibiae were stabilized using one of the four constructs. Load versus proximal fragment translation and rotation were monitored in each case. Fixation was evaluated for moderately unstable and completely unstable fractures simulated by wedge and gap osteotomies of the proximal femur. SETTING: Academic medical center biomechanical engineering laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Proximal fragment axial displacement, varus rotation, and posterior rotation versus applied load for each of the constructs. RESULTS: The double-plate construct was significantly stiffer than all other constructs with regard to resistance to axial displacement, varus rotation, and posterior rotation for both types of unstable fractures. With regard to axial stiffness, the double-plate construct was statistically similar to an intact tibia for moderately stable fractures. The locking plate and the external fixator were similar for stabilization of moderately unstable fractures, whereas the locking plate and the periarticular plate were significantly stiffer than the external fixator construct for completely unstable fractures. CONCLUSION: For axial load applied to a wedge or gap osteotomy of the proximal tibia, the double-plate construct provided significantly more rigidity than the other constructs. The locking plate, periarticular plate, and hybrid external fixator tested provided similar rigidity for the wedge osteotomy, but for the gap osteotomy the external fixator could not support 600N without complete closure of the gap.