Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 33(3): 659-664, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33991220

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is common in women but few seek medical attention. Poor recognition of the condition as pathological and unawareness of treatments may account for low consultation rates. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was based on an online survey that was responded to in February and March 2020 by 768 female university students. Knowledge of PFD was assessed using the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ). Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS (V26.0). RESULTS: Respondents had poor knowledge of PFD and especially of pelvic organ prolapse. Health science students (n = 531; 69.1%) obtained significantly higher scores (p < 0.001) than other students (n = 237; 30.9%). Those who had received information on how to perform pelvic floor muscle training were more likely to score higher than those who had not received previous information. CONCLUSIONS: While health science students have better knowledge of PFD than other students, university students in general are little aware of PFD. Most students considered the issue of PFD to be important and wanted more information. Our findings may be useful in planning strategies to raise women's awareness of PFD and its prevention and treatment.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Floor Disorders , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Urinary Incontinence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Pelvic Floor Disorders/etiology , Pelvic Floor Disorders/therapy , Students , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...