The Discriminatory Ability of the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST): An International Study in Spain and Four Latin American Countries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the transcultural equivalency of the Spanish version of the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) and its discriminatory ability in different Latin American samples. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: Departments of Rheumatology in general hospitals and private centers; fibromyalgia unit in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: 350 chronic pain patients from Spain, Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Ecuador. METHODS: The cultural relevance of the Spanish version of the FiRST was evaluated. The ability of the FiRST as a screening tool for fibromyalgia was assessed by logistic regression analysis. To determine the degree to which potential confounders, such as differences in demographics, pain, affective distress, catastrophizing, and disability, might affect the discriminatory ability, the tool was reassessed by hierarchical multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Slightly different versions of the FiRST were recommended for use in each Latin American subsample. The FiRST showed acceptable criterion validity and was able to discriminate between fibromyalgia and non-fibromyalgia patients even after controlling for the effect of potential confounders. However, low specificities were observed in samples from Spain and Mexico. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the FiRST may be used as a screening tool for fibromyalgia in several Latin American subsamples, even in those patients with high scores on potential confounders. In Spain and Mexico, the low specificity of the FiRST suggests, however, that it would be best used to support a suspected diagnosis of fibromyalgia, rather than to exclude the diagnosis.

Long term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy with uracil-ftegafur (UFT), vinorelbine and cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT and carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in non-resectable locally advanced (stage IV-B) squamous cell head and neck carcinoma and peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCS) with febrile neutropenia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response of advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinoma to a combination of induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. METHODS: We present long-term results of a phase II trial of Induction Chemotherapy with UFT 200 mg/m(2) p.o. days 1 to 21, Vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8 and Cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 (UFTVP) each 21 days for 4 courses, followed by Radiotherapy concomitant with UFT 100 mg/m(2) p.o. daily and Carboplatin AUC = 0.5 i.v. weekly (RT/UFTJ) in patients (pts) with Non-Resectable Locally Advanced (Stage IV-B) Squamous Cell Head and Neck Carcinoma (IV-B-SCHNC). Primary endpoint was Complete Response to induction UFTVP and secondary endpoints were Disease Free Status Rate after locoregional treatment and long-term Overall Survival. Between 1994 and 1997, 32 pts were included. RESULTS: Complete Response to Induction UFTVP was 59% (95% CI: 48%-70%). Main toxicity of UFTVP was G 3,4 neutropenia (94% of pts; 25% developed febrile neutropenia and 1 of this pts dead). After Induction Chemotherapy with UFTVP, 30 pts received radiotherapy and 25 of them received concomitant Carboplatin and UFT (RT/UFTJ): main toxicity was mucositis (G3-4: 72%) and one patient died during RT/UFTJ because pneumonia. Twenty-five pts (78%) were alive and disease free at the end of the whole treatment. Actuarial 5 year Overall survival is 32%. CONCLUSION: Although toxicity is important, this approach has interesting activity and deserves further investigation.