Coronary stenting for ST-elevation myocardial infarction vs. other indications in patients on oral anticoagulation: any difference in in-hospital management and outcome?

AIM: The aim of this paper was to compare the in-hospital management and outcome of patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing coronary artery stenting (PCI-S) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) vs. other indications. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients on OAC at the time of PCI-S who were prospectively enrolled in a multi-center, observational registry, were evaluated. Patients were segregated according to whether PCI-S was performed for STEMI (group 1) or other indications, such as non ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, stable angina, silent ischemia, etc. (group 2), and the pharmacological and procedural management, as well as the in-hospital outcome, were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in vascular access site, sheath size and type of stent implanted, nor was significantly different the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and the use and dose of intravenous unfractionated heparin. Although not statistically different, the in-hospital occurrence of death (3.7% vs. 1.1%; OR 3.3; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.2-56.0), stent thrombosis (3.7% vs. 1.1%; OR 3.3; 95% CI 0.2-56.0) and major bleeding (7.4% vs. 2.2%; OR 3.4; 95% CI 0.4-25.9) was consistently about 3-fold higher in group 1. CONCLUSION: The in-hospital pharmacological and procedural management of OAC patients undergoing PCI-S for STEMI vs. other indications appears not different. Although not significantly different however, the in-hospital occurrence of major bleeding, as well as of death and stent thrombosis, appears substantially higher in patients treated for STEMI, warranting therefore further larger, prospective studies.

Contemporary antithrombotic treatment after coronary stenting in patients with indication for long-term anticoagulation.

AIM: Dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and a thienopyridine is the antithrombotic treatment recommended after percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-S). Optimal treatment in patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing PCI-S is currently undefined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contemporary management of these patients, and determine the safety and the efficacy of the various regimens. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature reporting on this issue was carried out. RESULTS: The adopted strategies showed substantial variability, and the regimens used included: substitution of OAC for dual antiplatelet therapy in 25-54% of cases, addition to OAC of a single antiplatelet agent in 12-25% and institution of triple therapy with OAC (or low-molecular-weight heparin), aspirin and a thienopyridine in about 60%. OAC was systematically aimed at a lower intensity in 33% of cases, whereas in another 29% this was pursued only when a high hemorrhagic risk was perceived. Both safety and efficacy of the various regimens appeared suboptimal, with a 30-day occurrence of major bleeding and thrombotic complications of 3-7% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the suboptimal safety and/or efficacy of the various regimens adopted, the optimal antithrombotic treatment in patients with an indication for OAC undergoing PCI-S remains to be defined. Since the number of this patient subgroup is foreseen to progressively increase over the next years, large scale registries and clinical trials are warranted.

[Use of verapamil vs. beta blockers in patients with myocardial infarct. Retrospective evaluation of the yearly case load of a coronary care unit]. / Impiego del verapamil vs beta-bloccanti nei pazienti con infarto miocardico. Valutazione retrospettiva della casistica annuale di una unità coronarica.

BACKGROUND, MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare the relative use of verapamil and beta-blockers, which have shown comparable efficacy in reducing mortality and reinfarction rates in selected patients with myocardial infarction (MI), we retrospectively evaluated the ongoing treatment at the time of the pre-discharge evaluation in 221 consecutive patients (167 males and 54 females; mean age: 62.3 +/- 10.8 years) discharged alive in 1994 from our Hospital with the diagnosis of Q-wave MI. RESULTS: The examination of the computerized files of our central database, showed that verapamil was administered (as a monotherapy or in association) to 4% of the patients, compared to 34% of beta-blockers. The choice between the two drugs appeared not to be influenced by age (62 +/- 11 vs 57 +/- 8 years), anterior (70% vs 57%) or inferior (30% vs 40%) MI location or echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (50.2 +/- 10% vs 52.3 +/- 11%), which were comparable in both groups. On the other hand, beta-blockers were used significantly more often (52% vs 10%; p < 0.05) in the presence of hypertension, while verapamil was preferred (although statistical significance was not reached) in patients with contraindications to beta-blockers, such as chronic obstructive lung disease or peripheral artery disease (20% vs 9% and 10% vs 4%; p = ns, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study gives, for the first time, an estimate of the real use of verapamil in patients with MI, confirming, in keeping with the indications in the literature, that its administration is limited and essentially reserved to patients with contraindications to beta-blockers. A wider use of verapamil (and even more of beta-blockers) would be however hoped for, due to the relevant number of patients (62% of our population) treated with drugs, such as diltiazem, dihydropyridines or nitrates, for which a conclusive demonstration of efficacy on major clinical end-points are lacking.

[Right atrial thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: role of echocardiography]. / Trombosi atriale destra ed embolia polmonare: ruolo dell'ecocardiografia.

The echocardiographic detection of a right thromboembolus, although rare, should be considered as a cardiological emergency that could lead to death for massive pulmonary embolism. The case of a 70 year-old man admitted to our Institution with the suspicion of pulmonary embolism is described. The echocardiogram performed showed a large mobile thrombus in the right atrium prolapsing through the tricuspid valve during diastole. After thrombolytic therapy with r-TPA, the patient faced a progressive hemodynamic deterioration and died of electromechanical dissociation.