Cluster randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help mental health intervention in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether an ultrabrief intervention (UBI) improves mental health outcomes for patients in general practice with mild-to-moderate mental health concerns. TRIAL DESIGN: Two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. METHODS: Participants: general practitioners (GPs) were invited based on working in a participating general practice. Patients were eligible to participate if aged 18-65 years, scored ≤35 on the Kessler-10 (K10) and if meeting local mental health access criteria (based on age, low income or ethnic group). INTERVENTIONS: intervention arm GPs were trained on the UBI approach, with participating patients receiving three structured appointments over 5 weeks. GPs randomised to practice as usual (PAU) did not receive training, and delivered support following their existing practice approaches. OUTCOME MEASURES: primary outcome was patient-level K10 score at 6 months postrecruitment.Randomisation: GP practices were randomised to UBI training or PAU at the start of the study.Blinding: GPs were not blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: Numbers randomised: 62 GPs (recruiting 85 patients) were randomised to UBI, and 50 to PAU (recruiting 75 patients).Numbers analysed: 31 GPs recruited at least one patient in the UBI arm (70 patients analysed), and 21 GPs recruited at least one patient in the PAU arm (69 patients analysed). OUTCOME: K10 scores from an intention-to-treat analysis were similar in UBI and PAU arms, with a wide CI (mean adjusted K10 difference=1.68 points higher in UBI arm, 95% CI -1.18 to 4.55; p=0.255). Secondary outcomes were also similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: the UBI intervention did not lead to better outcomes than practice as usual, although the study had lower than planned power due to poor recruitment. The study results can still contribute to the continuing debate about brief psychological therapy options for primary care and their development. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613000041752; Pre-results.

Beyond crisis care in brain injury rehabilitation in australia: a conversation worth having.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this commentary was to bring together the various significant issues associated with delivering brain injury rehabilitation in Australia. Through observational critique, the authors aimed to identify gaps in practice and opportunities for change. APPROACH: In light of Australia's national health reform process, it is necessary to consider rehabilitation practices and models for brain injury service delivery. There are lessons to be learned within the Australian system, but also opportunities to apply international reform. CONCLUSION: For those within the service delivery system, brain injury rehabilitation can often appear to be a crisis-driven response. Gaps in service provision persist, leaving individuals who have reduced cognitive and emotional capacity to self-navigate an unpredictable health system at a time in their lives when they are least prepared to do so. Deficiencies in the delivery of timely and appropriate psychosocial or behavioral rehabilitation services undoubtedly contribute to the current pressures on the health system created by increased length of stay in neurological and slow-to-recover rehabilitation units, repeat presentations to primary care, and frequent use of community mental health services. IMPLICATION: The experiences of people with acquired brain injury highlights the need for early and targeted interventions that can deal with emerging complexities and support needs, interorganizational approaches, and new accommodation options with a matched service philosophy. Rather than count on good fortune, individual outcomes, and the future of brain injury, rehabilitation ought to depend on deliberate and systemic design.

Effective strategies for suicide prevention in New Zealand: a review of the evidence.

A national suicide prevention strategy for New Zealand was developed in 2006. There is relatively little strong evidence for the efficacy of many existing suicide prevention initiatives, and this area has frequently been captured by strong claims about the effectiveness of programmes that have not been adequately evaluated. This paper provides a conceptual framework for classifying suicide prevention initiatives, reviews evidence for their effectiveness, and makes recommendations for initiatives to be undertaken as part of suicide prevention activities in New Zealand. The available evidence thus far suggests that the most promising interventions likely to be effective in reducing suicidal behaviours are medical practitioner and gatekeeper education, and restriction of access to lethal means of suicide. This evidence also suggests a clear agenda for research, which includes evaluating interventions and prevention programmes, developing model and demonstration projects, identifying meaningful outcome measures, and refining and identifying the critical elements of effective programmes.