Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 30(2): 221-230, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271104

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Estimating the return on investment for public health services, tailored to the state level, is critical for demonstrating their value and making resource allocation decisions. However, many health departments have limited staff capacity and expertise to conduct economic analyses in-house. PROGRAM: We developed a user-friendly, interactive Excel-based spreadsheet model that health departments can use to estimate the impact of increases or decreases in sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention funding on the incidence and direct medical costs of chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and STI-attributable HIV infections. Users tailor results to their jurisdictions by entering the size of their population served; the number of annual STI diagnoses; their prior annual funding amount; and their anticipated new funding amount. The interface was developed using human-centered design principles, including focus groups with 15 model users to collect feedback on an earlier model version and a usability study on the prototype with 6 model users to finalize the interface. IMPLEMENTATION: The STI Prevention Allocation Consequences Estimator ("SPACE Monkey 2.0") model will be publicly available as a free downloadable tool. EVALUATION: In the usability testing of the prototype, participants provided overall positive feedback. They appreciated the clear interpretations, outcomes expressed as direct medical costs, functionalities to interact with the output and copy charts into external applications, visualization designs, and accessible information about the model's assumptions and limitations. Participants provided positive responses to a 10-item usability evaluation survey regarding their experiences with the prototype. DISCUSSION: Modeling tools that synthesize literature-based estimates and are developed with human-centered design principles have the potential to make evidence-based estimates of budget changes widely accessible to health departments.


Subject(s)
Gonorrhea , HIV Infections , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Syphilis , Humans , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/prevention & control , Syphilis/epidemiology , Costs and Cost Analysis
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 47(8): 511-515, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a high level of coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among persons diagnosed with syphilis in the United States. Public health workers at state and local health departments help inform exposed partners to sexually transmitted disease (STD)/HIV infections to facilitate early testing and treatment (partner services). The federal initiative, Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE), identifies 4 key strategies: diagnose, treat, prevent, and respond. This study describes the contributions of syphilis partner services to the EHE strategies in a county prioritized by the EHE plan. METHODS: A retrospective record review of reported early syphilis cases (less than 1 year's duration) between 2016 and 2018 in the Indianapolis area was conducted to determine the extent of new HIV diagnoses, retention in HIV care, and other evidence-based HIV prevention interventions occurring after provision of syphilis partner services. RESULTS: A total of 752 partners to early syphilis were attempted to be notified of exposure. There were 1,457 case patients and partners that received STD/HIV prevention counseling; 400 partners received STD treatment, 352 partners learned their HIV status, and 22 received new HIV diagnoses, with 68% retained in medical care and 60% virally suppressed. Two thirds of partner services were completed within 21 days. New HIV positivity among partners to HIV-negative syphilis case patients was 3.5% and 14% among HIV-positive syphilis case patients. CONCLUSIONS: Partner services for syphilis was an effective method of addressing the EHE strategies, resulting in persons at risk tested, STD treatment provided, behavioral prevention counseling provided, and new HIV cases identified, leading to retention in medical care and viral suppression.


Subject(s)
Epidemics , HIV Infections , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Syphilis , Contact Tracing , Female , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sexual Partners , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Syphilis/diagnosis , Syphilis/drug therapy , Syphilis/epidemiology
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 45(11): 707-712, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29771868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since the late 1990s, health departments and sexually transmitted disease (STD) programs throughout the United States have used technologies, such as the Internet and mobile phones, to provide services to persons with a sexually transmitted infection, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and their sex partners, also known as partner services. This study reviewed the published literature to assess and compare partner services outcomes as a result of using technology and to calculate cost savings through cases averted. METHODS: We conducted a structured literature review of all US studies that examined the use of technology to notify persons exposed to an STD (syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea), including HIV, by health care professionals in the United States from 2000 to 2017. Outcome measures, including the number of partners notified, screened or tested; and new positives identified, were captured and cost savings were calculated, when data were available. RESULTS: Seven studies were identified. Methods used for partner services differed across studies, although email was the primary mode in 6 (83%) of the 7 studies. Only 2 of the 7 studies compared use of technology for partner services to traditional partner services. Between 10% and 97% of partners were successfully notified of their exposure through the use of technology and between 34% and 81% were screened or tested. Five studies reported on new infections identified, which ranged from 3 to 19. Use of technology for partner serves saved programs between US $22,795 and US $45,362 in direct and indirect medical costs. CONCLUSIONS: Use of technology for partner services increased the number of partners notified, screened or tested, and new infections found. Importantly, the use of technology allowed programs to reach partners who otherwise would not have been notified of their exposure to an STD or HIV. Improved response times and time to treatment were also seen as was re-engagement into care for previous HIV positive patients. Data and outcome measures across the studies were not standardized, making it difficult to generalize conclusions. Although not a replacement for traditional partner services, the use of technology enhances partner service outcomes.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology/economics , Contact Tracing , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/economics , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Biomedical Technology/methods , Cell Phone , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/economics , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Internet , Public Health/economics , Public Health/instrumentation , Public Health/methods , Syphilis/epidemiology , United States
4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(2 Suppl 1): S53-62, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26779688

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Partner services have been a mainstay of public health sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention programs for decades. The principal goals are to interrupt transmission and reduce STD morbidity and sequelae. In this article, we review current literature with the goal of informing STD prevention programs. METHODS: We searched the literature for systematic reviews. We found 9 reviews published between 2005 and 2014 (covering 108 studies). The reviews varied by study inclusion criteria (e.g., study methods, geographic location, and infections). We abstracted major conclusions and recommendations from the reviews. RESULTS: Conclusions and recommendations were divided into patient referral interventions and provider referral interventions. For patient referral, there was evidence supporting the use of expedited partner therapy and interactive counseling, but not purely didactic instruction. Provider referral through Disease Intervention Specialists was efficacious and particularly well supported for HIV. For other studies, modeling data and testing outcomes showed that partner notification in general reached high-prevalence populations. Reviews also suggested more focus on using technology and population-level implementation strategies. However, partner services may not be the most efficient means to reach infected persons. CONCLUSIONS: Partner services programs constitute a large proportion of program STD prevention activities. Value is maximized by balancing a portfolio of patient and provider referral interventions and by blending partner notification interventions with other STD prevention interventions in overall partner services program structure. Sexually transmitted disease prevention needs program-level research and development to generate this portfolio.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , Public Health , Sexual Partners/psychology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Contact Tracing/methods , Humans , Prevalence , Program Evaluation , Referral and Consultation , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/psychology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/transmission , United States/epidemiology
5.
Women Health ; 54(8): 712-25, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25189136

ABSTRACT

An estimated 2.9 million new chlamydia infections occur in the United States each year. Among women, chlamydia can lead to serious adverse outcomes, including pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Chlamydia prevalence is highest among females aged 15-19 years. Despite long-standing recommendations directed at young, sexually active females, screening remains sub-optimal. Juvenile detention centers (JDCs) are uniquely situated to screen and treat high-risk adolescents. From 2009-2011, performance measure data on chlamydia screening coverage (proportion of eligible females screened) and positivity (proportion of females tested who were positive) were available from 126 geographically-dispersed JDCs in the United States. These facilities reported screening 55.2% of females entering the facilities (149,923), with a facility-specific median of 66.4% (range: 0-100%). Almost half (44.4%) of facilities had screening coverage levels of 75-100%. This screening resulted in the detection of 12,305 chlamydial infections, for an overall positivity of 14.7% (facility-specific median = 14.9%, range: 0-36.9%). In linear regression analysis, chlamydia positivity was inversely associated with screening coverage: as coverage increased, positivity decreased. The burden of chlamydia in JDCs is substantial; facilities should continue to deliver recommended chlamydia screening and treatment to females and identify mechanisms to increase coverage.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Mass Screening/methods , Prisoners , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Chlamydia/isolation & purification , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Prevalence , Prisons , United States/epidemiology
6.
Sex Transm Infect ; 89(7): 590-4, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23825304

ABSTRACT

Systematic analysis of STD programme data contributes to a national portrait of sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention activities, including research and evaluation specifically designed to optimise programme efficiency and impact. We analysed the narrative of the 2009 annual progress reports of the US Comprehensive STD Prevention Systems cooperative agreement for 58 STD programmes, concentrating on programme characteristics and partnerships. Programmes described 516 unique partnerships with a median of seven organisations cited per STD programme. Non-profit organisations (including service providers) were most frequently cited. Higher gonorrhoea morbidity was associated with reporting more partnerships; budget problems were associated with reporting fewer. Challenges to engaging in partnerships included budget constraints, staff turnover and low interest. Data provide a source of information for judging progress in programme collaboration and for informing a sustained programme-focused research and evaluation agenda.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Health Services Administration/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Health Services Administration/economics , Health Services Administration/trends , Humans , Program Evaluation , United States
7.
Sex Transm Dis ; 38(7): 610-6, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21278623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Performance measures were developed in order to improve the performance of sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention programs. METHODS: A consultant worked with persons from STD programs and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to identify possible measures. Measures were pilot tested for feasibility and relevance in several programs, then implemented nationwide in 2004. Data were collated and shared with programs and presented at national meetings. Site visits, webinars, and technical assistance focused on program improvement related to the measures. Reported data were analyzed to see if national performance improved on the activities measured. RESULTS: Some measures were dropped or revised, and quality of reported data improved over time. There was little evidence that overall program performance improved. CONCLUSIONS: Performance measures are one way to monitor performance, and might contribute to program improvement, but additional efforts are needed to improve performance.


Subject(s)
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Program Evaluation/methods , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia Infections/drug therapy , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Public Health/standards , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/therapy , United States
8.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 6: 10, 2008 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18500996

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs can mitigate the health and economic burden of STIs. A tool to estimate the economic benefits of STI programs could prove useful to STI program personnel. METHODS: We developed formulas that can be applied to estimate the direct medical costs and indirect costs (lost productivity) averted by STI programs in the United States. Costs and probabilities for these formulas were based primarily on published studies. RESULTS: We present a series of formulas that can be used to estimate the economic benefits of STI prevention (in 2006 US dollars), using data routinely collected by STI programs. For example, the averted sequelae costs associated with treating women for chlamydia is given as (Cw)(0.16)(0.925)(0.70)($1,995), where Cw is the number of infected women treated for chlamydia, 0.16 is the absolute reduction in the probability of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) as a result of treatment, 0.925 is an adjustment factor to prevent double-counting of PID averted in women with both chlamydia and gonorrhea, 0.70 is an adjustment factor to account for the possibility of re-infection, and $1,995 is the average cost per case of PID, based on published sources. CONCLUSION: The formulas developed in this study can be a useful tool for STI program personnel to generate evidence-based estimates of the economic impact of their program and can facilitate the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of their activities.

10.
Sex Transm Dis ; 32(5): 265-9, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15849526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the United States, there is a high rate of HIV coinfection in persons with syphilis. GOAL: The goal of this study was to estimate the rate of primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis in persons living with HIV in the United States in 2002. STUDY: We approximated the number of new cases of P&S syphilis in HIV-infected persons and divided this by the estimated number of persons living with HIV. Values for the calculations were obtained from national syphilis and HIV/AIDS surveillance reports and other published sources. RESULTS: We estimated the rate of new cases of P&S syphilis at 186 per 100,000 persons living with HIV in 2002, 25 per 100,000 HIV-infected women, 60 per 100,000 HIV-infected men who have sex with women only, and 336 per 100,000 HIV-infected men who have sex with men. Of the 6862 reported cases of P&S syphilis in 2002, an estimated 1718 (25%) occurred in persons coinfected with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated rate of P&S syphilis in persons with HIV is considerably higher than that of the general population. These findings highlight the importance of providing sexually transmitted disease prevention and control services to HIV-infected persons.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , Syphilis/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Statistical , Risk Factors , Sexual Behavior , Syphilis/complications , Syphilis/pathology , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...