An inverse agonist selective for alpha5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors improves encoding and recall but not consolidation in the Morris water maze.

RATIONALE: Compounds selective for the GABAA receptors containing an alpha5 subunit have been reported to enhance performance in the hippocampally mediated delayed-matching-to-position version of the Morris water maze, in which reduction in the time required to find a hidden platform relative to an initial trial is used as an index of learning and memory. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we have used one such compound, alpha5IA-II, to examine whether these effects occur during the encoding, consolidation or recall phases of this paradigm. METHODS: alpha5IA-II was administered in the absence or presence of the benzodiazepine site antagonist flumazenil, so as to limit its action to periods associated with encoding, consolidation and recall. Drug doses and timings of administrations were defined using occupancy data derived from an in vivo [3H]flumazenil binding assay. Similar experiments were carried out to study the memory-disruptive properties of chlordiazepoxide (CDP). RESULTS: The trial 1 to trial 2 difference was increased when alpha5IA-II was given before either trial 1 or trial 2, indicating an effect on the encoding and recall phases, respectively, of learning and memory. Conversely, alpha5IA-II had no effect on performance when given immediately after trial 1, suggesting that it had no effect on the consolidation phase. In contrast to the facilitation of performance produced by the alpha5-selective inverse agonist alpha5IA-II given during the encoding and recall but not the consolidation phase, the non-selective agonist CDP impaired performance when given during the encoding and recall phases, whilst having no effect on the consolidation phase. CONCLUSIONS: These data further highlight the cognition-enhancing properties of GABAA alpha5-selective inverse agonists and define the functional specificity of these effects in terms of encoding and recall processes in the Morris water maze.

An inverse agonist selective for alpha5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors enhances cognition.

Alpha5IA is a compound that binds with equivalent subnanomolar affinity to the benzodiazepine (BZ) site of GABA(A) receptors containing an alpha1, alpha2, alpha3, or alpha5 subunit but has inverse agonist efficacy selective for the alpha5 subtype. As a consequence, the in vitro and in vivo effects of this compound are mediated primarily via GABA(A) receptors containing an alpha5 subunit. In a mouse hippocampal slice model, alpha5IA significantly enhanced the burst-induced long-term potentiation of the excitatory postsynaptic potential in the CA1 region but did not cause an increase in the paroxysmal burst discharges that are characteristic of convulsant and proconvulsant drugs. These in vitro data suggesting that alpha5IA may enhance cognition without being proconvulsant were confirmed in in vivo rodent models. Hence, alpha5IA significantly enhanced performance in a rat hippocampal-dependent test of learning and memory, the delayed-matching-to-position version of the Morris water maze, with a minimum effective oral dose of 0.3 mg/kg, which corresponded to a BZ site occupancy of 25%. However, in mice alpha5IA was not convulsant in its own right nor did it potentiate the effects of pentylenetetrazole acutely or produce kindling upon chronic dosing even at doses producing greater than 90% occupancy. Finally, alpha5IA was not anxiogenic-like in the rat elevated plus maze nor did it impair performance in the mouse rotarod assay. Together, these data suggest that the GABA(A) alpha5-subtype provides a novel target for the development of selective inverse agonists with utility in the treatment of disorders associated with a cognitive deficit.

Loss of the major GABA(A) receptor subtype in the brain is not lethal in mice.

The alpha1beta2gamma2 is the most abundant subtype of the GABA(A) receptor and is localized in many regions of the brain. To gain more insight into the role of this receptor subtype in the modulation of inhibitory neurotransmission, we generated mice lacking either the alpha1 or beta2 subunit. In agreement with the reported abundance of this subtype, >50% of total GABA(A) receptors are lost in both alpha1-/- and beta2-/- mice. Surprisingly, homozygotes of both mouse lines are viable, fertile, and show no spontaneous seizures. Initially half of the alpha1-/- mice died prenatally or perinatally, but they exhibited a lower mortality rate in subsequent generations, suggesting some phenotypic drift and adaptive changes. Both adult alpha1-/- and beta2-/- mice demonstrate normal performances on the rotarod, but beta2-/- mice displayed increased locomotor activity. Purkinje cells of the cerebellum primarily express alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors, and in electrophysiological recordings from alpha1-/- mice GABA currents in these neurons are dramatically reduced, and residual currents have a benzodiazepine pharmacology characteristic of alpha2- or alpha3-containing receptors. In contrast, the cerebellar Purkinje neurons from beta2-/- mice have only a relatively small reduction of GABA currents. In beta2-/- mice expression levels of all six alpha subunits are reduced by approximately 50%, suggesting that the beta2 subunit can coassemble with alpha subunits other than just alpha1. Our data confirm that alpha1beta2gamma2 is the major GABA(A) receptor subtype in the murine brain and demonstrate that, surprisingly, the loss of this receptor subtype is not lethal.

On the elevated plus-maze the anxiolytic-like effects of the 5-HT(1A) agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, but not the anxiogenic-like effects of the 5-HT(1A) partial agonist, buspirone, are blocked by the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY 100635.

In the present study we evaluated the effects of the 5-HT(1A) receptor partial agonist, buspirone hydrochloride and the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on the elevated plus-maze. In addition, the ability of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, to reverse the effects of both compounds was determined. 8-OH-DPAT (0.01 0.3 mg/kg, SC) dose-dependently increased the percent time on, and the number of entries to, the open arms of the maze. In a second experiment, WAY 100635 (0.003 0.3 mg/kg, SC) dose-dependently reversed the anxiolytic-like effects of 8-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg, SC). In a third experiment, buspirone (0.3-4.0 mg/kg, SC) dose-dependently decreased the time spent on the open arms of the maze, indicating that it had anxiogenic-like effects. Buspirone also significantly decreased locomotor activity, which was evident in the decreases in the distance travelled on the open arms, closed arms and on the maze as a whole, the total number of arm entries and the mean speed of the animals. In contrast to its effects on 8-OH-DPAT-induced behaviours in the maze, WAY 100635 (0.003 1.0 mg/kg SC) failed to reverse any of the effects induced by buspirone. Animals treated with high doses of WAY 100635 (0.3 1.0 mg/kg SC) alone did not significantly differ from vehicle-treated animals on any of the measures recorded during elevated plus-maze trials. These data suggest that the anxiolytic-like effects of 8-OH-DPAT, but not the anxiogenic-like effects of buspirone, on the elevated plus-maze are mediated via 5-HT(1A) receptors in the CNS.

L-745,870, a subtype selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, does not exhibit a neuroleptic-like profile in rodent behavioral tests.

This study examined the high-affinity, selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, L-745,870 (3-([4-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2, 3-b]pyridine) in rodent behavioral models used to predict antipsychotic potential and side-effect liabilities in humans. In contrast to the classical neuroleptic, haloperidol, and the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine, L-745,870 failed to antagonize amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in mice or impair conditioned avoidance responding in the rat at doses selectively blocking D4 receptors. Furthermore, L-745,870 failed to reverse the deficit in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle responding induced by the nonselective dopamine D2/3/4 receptor agonist apomorphine, an effect which was abolished in rats pretreated with the D2/3 receptor antagonist, raclopride (0.2 mg/kg s.c.). L-745,870 had no effect on apomorphine-induced stereotypy in the rat but did induce catalepsy in the mouse, albeit at a high dose of 100 mg/kg, which is likely to occupy dopamine D2 receptors in vivo. High doses also impaired motor performance; in rats L-745,870 significantly reduced spontaneous locomotor activity (minimum effective dose = 30 mg/kg) and in mice, L-745,870 reduced the time spent on a rotarod revolving at 15 rpm (minimum effective dose = 100 mg/kg). Altogether these results suggest that dopamine D4 receptor antagonism is not responsible for the ability of clozapine to attenuate amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and conditioned avoidance responding in rodents. Furthermore, the lack of effect of L-745,870 in these behavioral tests is consistent with the inability of the compound to alleviate psychotic symptoms in humans.

Evidence that the anxiolytic-like effects of chlordiazepoxide on the elevated plus maze are confounded by increases in locomotor activity.

In exploratory animal models of anxiety, such as the elevated plus maze, the anxiogenic- and anxiolytic-like effects of drugs may be confounded by changes in locomotor activity. In the present experiments, the sensitivity of several measures of anxiety and locomotor activity in the elevated plus maze were assessed. Both chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride (CDP, 7.5 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine sulphate (AMP, 0.75, 1.5 mg/kg) increased the percent time on the open arms and doses of 7.5 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg CDP and AMP, respectively, increased the number of entries into the open arms. The increase in these measures might suggest that both compounds induced an anxiolytic-like effect. Although FG 7142 (30.0 mg/kg) did not decrease the number of entries to the open arms, it did decrease the time on the open arms, which might suggest that it had anxiogenic-like effects. Similarly, buspirone reduced both the number of entries into the open arms and the time spent on the open arms. However, all the compounds significantly affected locomotor activity. CDP (3.0 and 7.5 mg/kg) increased the total number of arm entries, the distance travelled on the open arms and the mean speed of the animals on the open, and in the closed arms. Moreover, the distance travelled by the animals in the closed arms was increased by 1.0 mg/kg CDP, a dose that had no measurable effects on the indices of anxiety.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)