The clinical and diagnostic performance characteristics of the high sensitivity Abbott cardiac troponin I assay.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the imprecision profile, 99th percentile and diagnostic efficiency of a new high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay. METHODS: Total imprecision was assessed by following CLSI protocol EP15-A.14. Serum pools prepared from sera of known high cardiac troponin concentrations were adjusted by dilution with serum considered to be troponin free. Determination of the 99th-percentile reference value examined a fully characterized population that had undergone non-invasive cardiac imaging. Diagnostic accuracy utilised samples from the point of care arm of the RATPAC trial (Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers), set in the emergency departments of six hospitals. Blood samples were taken on admission and 90min from admission. Diagnosis was based on the universal definition of myocardial infarction utilising laboratory measurements of cardiac troponin performed at the participating sites together with measurements performed in a core laboratory and compared by construction of receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS: Total imprecision was 4%-12.1% with 10% CV of 7ng/L. cTnI was measureable in 99.5% of the samples. Troponin values were influenced by gender but not by age. The 99th percentile was 14.8ng/L (18.1 males, 8.6 females). Progressive filtering of the population reduced the 99th percentile. For the diagnosis of MI on admission the area under the curve was 0.92, statistically indistinguishable from four other assays studied (0.90-0.94). CONCLUSION: The analytical performance of the new assay meets the criteria for a high sensitivity troponin assay.

Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers--Contemporary Biomarker Evaluation (RATPAC CBE).

OBJECTIVES: To test the diagnostic accuracy for detecting an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using highly sensitive troponin assays and a range of new cardiac biomarkers of plaque destabilisation, myocardial ischaemia and necrosis; to test the prognostic accuracy for detecting adverse cardiac events using highly sensitive troponin assays and this range of new cardiac biomarkers; and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of using highly sensitive troponin assays or this range of new cardiac biomarkers instead of an admission and 10- to 12-hour troponin measurement. DESIGN: Substudy of the point-of-care arm of the RATPAC (Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers) trial. SETTING: The emergency departments of six hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Prospective admissions with chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram randomised to point-of-care assessment or conventional management. INTERVENTIONS: Blood samples taken on admission and 90 minutes from admission for measurement of cardiac markers [cardiac troponin I (cTnI), myoglobin and creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB)] by point-of-care testing. An additional blood sample was taken at admission and 90 minutes from admission for analysis of high-sensitivity cTnI (two methods) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT), myoglobin, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), copeptin and B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1. Diagnostic accuracy compared with the universal definition of myocardial infarction utilising laboratory measurements of cardiac troponin performed at the participating sites together with measurements performed in a core laboratory. 2. Ability of biomarker measurements to predict major adverse cardiac events (death, non-fatal AMI, emergency revascularisation or hospitalisation for myocardial ischaemia) at 3 months' follow-up. 3. Comparison of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of different biomarker measurement strategies for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Samples were available from 850 out of 1132 patients enrolled in the study. Measurement of admission myoglobin [area under the curve (AUC) 0.76] and CK-MB (AUC 0.84) was diagnostically inferior and did not add to the diagnostic efficiency of cTnI (AUC 0.90-0.94) or cTnT (AUC 0.92) measurement on admission. Simultaneous measurement of H-FABP and cTnT or cTnI did improve admission diagnostic sensitivity to 0.78-0.92, but only to the same level as that achieved with troponin measured on admission and at 90 minutes from admission (0.78-0.95). Copeptin (AUC 0.62) and NTproBNP (AUC 0.85) measured on admission were not useful as diagnostic markers. As a prognostic marker, troponin measured on admission using a high-sensitivity assay (AUC 0.73-0.83) was equivalent to NTproBNP measurement (AUC 0.77) on admission, but superior to copeptin measurement (AUC 0.58). From modelling, 10-hour troponin measurement is likely to be cost-effective compared with rapid rule-out strategies only if a £30,000 per QALY threshold is used and patients can be discharged as soon as a negative result is available. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin is the best single marker in patients presenting with chest pain. Additional measurements of myoglobin or CK-MB are not clinically effective or cost-effective. The optimal timing for measurement of cardiac troponin remains to be defined. Copeptin measurement is not recommended. H-FABP requires further investigation before it can be recommended for simultaneous measurement with high-sensitivity troponin in patients with acute chest pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN37823923. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 17, No. 15. See the HTA programme website for further project information.

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of diagnostic strategies for suspected acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Current practice for suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) involves troponin testing 10-12 hours after symptom onset to diagnose myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with a negative troponin can be investigated further with computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) or exercise electrocardiography (ECG). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of early biomarkers for MI, the prognostic accuracy of biomarkers for major adverse cardiac adverse events (MACEs) in troponin-negative patients, the diagnostic accuracy of CTCA and exercise ECG for coronary artery disease (CAD) and the prognostic accuracy of CTCA and exercise ECG for MACEs in patients with suspected ACS. We then aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of using alternative biomarker strategies to diagnose MI, and using biomarkers, CTCA and exercise ECG to risk-stratify troponin-negative patients. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations; Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Database of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), NHS Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Health Technology Assessment database from 1985 (CTCA review) or 1995 (biomarkers review) to November 2010, reviewed citation lists and contacted experts to identify relevant studies. REVIEW METHODS: Diagnostic studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and prognostic studies using a framework adapted for the project. Meta-analysis was conducted using bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. We developed a decision-analysis model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative biomarker strategies to diagnose MI, and the cost-effectiveness of biomarkers, CTCA or exercise ECG to risk-stratify patients with a negative troponin. Strategies were applied to a theoretical cohort of patients with suspected ACS. Cost-effectiveness was estimated as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of each strategy compared with the next most effective, taking a health-service perspective and a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity (95% predictive interval) were 77% (29-96%) and 93% (46-100%) for troponin I, 80% (33-97%) and 91% (53-99%) for troponin T (99th percentile threshold), 81% (50-95%) and 80% (26-98%) for quantitative heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP), 68% (11-97%) and 92% (20-100%) for qualitative H-FABP, 77% (19-98%) and 39% (2-95%) for ischaemia-modified albumin and 62% (35-83%) and 83% (35-98%) for myoglobin. CTCA had 94% (61-99%) sensitivity and 87% (16-100%) specificity for CAD. Positive CTCA and positive-exercise ECG had relative risks of 5.8 (0.6-24.5) and 8.0 (2.3-22.7) for MACEs. In most scenarios in the economic analysis presentation, high-sensitivity troponin measurement was the most effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than the £20,000-30,000/QALY threshold (ICER £7487-17,191/QALY). CTCA appeared to be the most cost-effective strategy for patients with a negative troponin, with an ICER of £11,041/QALY. However, when a lower MACE rate was assumed, CTCA had a high ICER (£262,061/QALY) and the no-testing strategy was optimal. LIMITATIONS: There was substantial variation between the primary studies and heterogeneity in their results. Findings of the economic model were dependent on assumptions regarding the value of detecting and treating positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although presentation troponin has suboptimal sensitivity, measurement of a 10-hour troponin level is unlikely to be cost-effective in most scenarios compared with a high-sensitivity presentation troponin. CTCA may be a cost-effective strategy for troponin-negative patients, but further research is required to estimate the effect of CTCA on event rates and health-care costs. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Current controversy: Triage of acute onset chest pain: now a biochemical rule-out test?

The management of coronary disease has moved forward with the application of more sensitive blood biomarkers for early detection alongside more structured symptom assessment, examination and serial ECG measures. However every episode of exertional chest pain isn't symptomatic coronary disease and given massive public awareness campaigns we now face a different management issue with undiagnosed chest pain sent as a 'rule-out' activity. These urgent referrals are often justified based on the management of the minority with unstable coronary disease without preliminary medical review or examination. Avoiding delay which is valuable in coronary patients may be irrelevant to the majority. The overall effectiveness of this pathway is unclear where the patient does not have coronary disease but also where superficial interpretation can be misleading through non-specificity. Do biomarker assays become the answer to every chest pain patient and has the basic assessment of the individual patient and a prior probability of disease no role to play? Does this activity represent a burden or an irrelevant dead end for non-coronary patients? We have asked for comment from two leading authorities on the evolving role and application of cardiac biomarker technologies in managing this considerable and common clinical dilemma.

Raised serum cardiac troponin I concentrations predict hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent work suggests that increased plasma concentrations of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) are common in critically ill patients and are associated with poor outcome. We measured the frequency of increased plasma cTnI concentrations during patients' stay in a mixed medical/surgical intensive care unit (ICU) and compared our findings with hospital mortality. METHODS: Basic details, organ support, and hospital mortality were recorded for all patients treated in ICU during a 6 month period. cTnI concentrations were sampled daily for all patients, using 0.04 µg litre(-1) as the upper limit of normal, and 0.12 µg litre(-1) as an additional stratification point. RESULTS: Of 663 patients, 54% were male, with a mean (sd) age of 60 (18) yr, 65% were surgical patients, and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Ill Health II (APACHE II) score was 15 (inter-quartile range 12-20). Increased cTnI concentrations were found in 345 patients (52%) while in ICU. One hundred and twenty patients (18%) died in hospital. cTnI concentration >0.04 µg litre(-1) was associated with reduced odds of hospital survival, independent of age, medical admission, unplanned admission, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, and haemofiltration (adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.75, P=0.014). Stratification by the degree of cTnI increase revealed an incremental trend towards a lower odds of hospital survival, including for patients with 'minor' elevations of cTnI (0.05-0.12 µg litre(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum cTnI concentrations during ICU stay independently predicts hospital mortality, even when the threshold is low. We found a trend towards an association between 'minor' elevations in cTnI and higher in-hospital mortality.

The RATPAC (Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers) trial: a randomised controlled trial of point-of-care cardiac markers in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using a point-of-care cardiac marker panel in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected but not proven acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Multicentre pragmatic open randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. SETTING: Six acute hospital EDs in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Adults presenting to hospital with chest pain due to suspected but not proven myocardial infarction, and no other potentially serious alternative pathology or comorbidity. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were allocated using an online randomisation system to receive either (1) diagnostic assessment using the point-of-care biochemical marker panel or (2) conventional diagnostic assessment without the panel. All tests and treatments other than the panel were provided at the discretion of the clinician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients successfully discharged home after ED assessment, defined as patients who had (1) either left the hospital or were awaiting transport home with a discharge decision having been made at 4 hours after initial presentation and (2) suffered no major adverse event (as defined below) during the following 3 months. Secondary outcomes included length of initial hospital stay and total inpatient days over 3 months, and major adverse events (death, non-fatal AMI, life-threatening arrhythmia, emergency revascularisation or hospitalisation for myocardial ischaemia). Economic analysis estimated mean costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and then estimated the probability of cost-effectiveness assuming willingness to pay of £20,000 per QALY gained. RESULTS: We randomised 1132 participants to point of care and 1131 to standard care, and analysed 1125 and 1118, respectively [mean age 54.5 years, 1307/2243 (58%) male and 269/2243 (12%) with known coronary heart disease (CHD)]. In the point-of-care group 358/1125 (32%) were successfully discharged compared with 146/1118 (13%) in the standard-care group [odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, gender and history of CHD 3.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.01 to 4.82, p < 0.001]. Mean length of the initial hospital stay was 29.6 hours versus 31.8 hours (mean difference = 2.1 hours; 95% CI -3.7 to 8.0 hours, p = 0.462), while median length of initial hospital stay was 8.8 hours versus 14.2 hours (p < 0.001). More patients in the point-of-care group had no inpatient days recorded during follow-up (54% vs 40%, p < 0.001), but mean inpatient days did not differ between the two groups (1.8 vs 1.7, p = 0.815). More patients in the point-of-care group were managed on coronary care [50/1125 (4%) vs 31/1118 (3%), p = 0.041]. There were 36 (3%) patients with major adverse events in the point-of-care group and 26 (2%) in the standard-care group (adjusted OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.78 to 2.20, p = 0.313). Mean costs per patient were £1217 with point-of-care versus £1006 with standard care (p = 0.056), while mean QALYs were 0.158 versus 0.161 (p = 0.250). The probability of standard care being dominant (i.e. cheaper and more effective) was 0.888. CONCLUSIONS: Point-of-care testing increases the proportion of patients successfully discharged home and reduces the median (but not mean) length of hospital stay. It is more expensive than standard care and unlikely to be considered cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN37823923. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 15, No. 23. See the HTA programme website for further project information.

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 12.

This twelfth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antiepileptic drug monitoring; (ii) infectious diarrhoea; (iii) methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; and (iv) brain natriuretic peptide. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

Early N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide measurements predict clinically significant ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.

UNLABELLED: We report a blinded, prospective study of the diagnostic utility of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) measurements for predicting clinically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and assessing closure. METHODS: Plasma NTproBNP was measured during the first week in 100 preterm babies (mean gestation 28.8 +/- 2.9 weeks; mean birth weight 1224 +/- 512 g). Echocardiography was performed between days 5 and 7 by operators, blinded to NTproBNP concentration. RESULTS: NTproBNP peaked on days 2 and 3, declined by day 7. Twenty babies, later treated for PDA, had significantly higher NTproBNP levels throughout. Areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.896, 0.897 and 0.931 on days 2, 3 and 7, respectively (p < 0.0001). A concentration > 2850 pmol/L had diagnostic sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 89% (95% CI: 68, 99; likelihood ratio 8.10). Ductal closure was associated with a fall in mean NTproBNP from 3003 to 839 pmol/L (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: N-terminal pro B-type brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) concentrations peaked and then declined in the first week but remained higher in preterm babies whose PDA required treatment. NTproBNP on day 3 predicted whether a neonatal physician blinded to results would treat a PDA. Fall in plasma NTproBNP indicated closure.

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 7.

This seventh best-practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) blood count abnormalities 2; (2) cardiac troponins; (3) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and (4) viral diseases 2. The review is presented in a question-answer format, with authorship attributed for each question series. The recommendations are a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. The recommendations are not standards, but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus based rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.

Maternal cardiac function in early pregnancies with high uterine artery resistance.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal cardiac function and serum concentration of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in first-trimester patients, according to uterine artery Doppler velocimetry (UADV). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included singleton pregnancies with normal UADV (n=17) and abnormal UADV (n=19). Maternal echocardiography was performed and blood samples were taken at 11-14 weeks. Echocardiographic parameters included: (a) left ventricular (LV) long axis velocities; (b) atrial size; (c) LV filling pressure; (d) the ratio of peak mitral flow velocity in early diastole and early mitral annular diastolic velocity (E/Ea ratio); and (e) the E/flow propagation velocity ratio. The maternal serum concentrations of cTnT and NT-proBNP were determined by sensitive and specific immunoassays. RESULTS: Patients with abnormal UADV had higher estimated left ventricular filling pressure (P=0.004), higher E/Ea ratio (P=0.03), higher E/flow propagation ratio (P=0.02), and lower LV long axis velocity (P=0.02) than those with normal UADV. There were no significant differences in the maternal serum concentration of cTnT or NT-proBNP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abnormal UADV in the first trimester have higher left ventricular filling pressure and may have left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measured on the DPC Immulite.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of the Immulite cTnI assay for the detection of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). POPULATION: 150 males and 63 females with a median age of 63 years, range 28 to 88, and an interquartile range of 18 years were admitted within 24 h of chest pain and non-ST segment elevation ACS were studied. The median onset of symptoms was 3 h (range 0-23). METHODS: Venous samples were taken on admission (t = 0) and at 24 h (t = 24). The serum samples were assayed for CK, CK-MB and cTnT on an Elecsys 1010 (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK). The cTnT assay CV was 5.5% at 0.32 microg/l and 5.4% at 6.0 microg/l, and the detection limit was 0.01 microg/l with an upper limit of 25 microg/l. For cTnI using the Immulite (DPC, Gwynedd, Wales), the detection limit was 0.1 microg/l, and the upper limit was 180 microg/l. Final diagnostic categorization was performed by both WHO and European Society of Cardiology criteria using cTnT as the diagnostic cardiac biomarker. Patients were followed for the major adverse cardiac events (MACE), endpoints cardiac death, AMI or need for urgent revascularization. ROC curves were constructed using final diagnosis. Outcome prediction was assessed by ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: Both methods had equivalent diagnostic efficiency using WHO criteria for AMI. When ESC criteria were used the AUC for admission and 24 h cTnT and cTnI values were 0.945 vs. 0.910, P = 0.20 and 0.998 vs. 0.937, P = 0.005, respectively. Both methods predicted outcome as either death or MI or MACE and were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The Immulite cTnI assay can be used for diagnosis and risk stratification in patients admitted with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Utility of admission cardiac troponin and "Ischemia Modified Albumin" measurements for rapid evaluation and rule out of suspected acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the combination of cardiac troponin (cTn) and Ischemia Modified Albumin (IMA) can be used for early exclusion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Prospective consecutive admissions to the emergency department (ED) with undifferentiated chest pain were assessed clinically and by electrocardiography. A total of 539 patients (335 men, 204 women; median age 51.9 years) considered at low risk of AMI had blood drawn on admission. If the first sample was less than 12 hours from onset of chest pain, a second sample was drawn two hours later, at least six hours from onset of chest pain. Creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CKMB) mass was measured on the first sample and CKMB mass and cTnT on the second sample. An aliquot from the first available sample was frozen and subsequently analysed for IMA. If cTnT had not been measured on the original sample cTnI was measured (n = 189). RESULTS: Complete data were available for 538/539 patients. IMA or cTn was elevated in the admission sample of all patients with a final diagnosis of AMI (n = 37) with IMA alone elevated in 2/37, cTn alone in 19/37, and both in 16/37. In 173/501 patients in whom AMI was excluded both tests were negative. In the non-AMI group 22 patients had elevation of both IMA and cTn in the initial sample, suggesting ischaemic disease. CONCLUSION: Admission measurement of cardiac troponin plus IMA can be used for early classification of patients presenting to the ED to assist in patient triage.

Cardiac structural and functional abnormalities in end stage renal disease patients with elevated cardiac troponin T.

OBJECTIVES: To identify in a prospective observational study the cardiac structural and functional abnormalities and mortality in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) with a raised cardiac troponin T (cTnT) concentration. METHODS: 126 renal transplant candidates were studied over a two year period. Clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic, coronary angiographic, and dobutamine stress echocardiographic (DSE) data were examined in comparison with cTnT concentrations dichotomised at cut off concentrations of < 0.04 microg/l and < 0.10 microg/l. RESULTS: Left ventricular (LV) size and filling pressure were significantly raised and LV systolic and diastolic function parameters significantly impaired in patients with raised cTnT, irrespective of the cut off concentration. The proportions of patients with diabetes and on dialysis were higher in both groups with raised cTnT. With a cut off cTnT concentration of 0.04 microg/l but not 0.10 microg/l, significantly more patients had severe coronary artery disease and a positive DSE result. The total ischaemic burden during DSE was similar in cTnT positive and negative patients, irrespective of the cut off concentration used. LV end systolic diameter index and E:Ea ratio were independent predictors of cTnT rises > or = 0.04 microg/l and > or = 0.10 microg/l, respectively. Diabetes was independently associated with cTnT at both cut off concentrations. Mortality was higher in all patients with raised cTnT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD with raised cTnT concentrations have increased mortality. Raised concentrations are strongly associated with diabetes, LV dilatation, and impaired LV systolic and diastolic function, but not with severe coronary artery disease.