Immunologic Monitoring after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, Are They the Same?

Despite prophylactic and preemptive strategies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and disease remains major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In recent years, immunologic monitoring using CMV commercially available IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) has gained interest to better risk-stratify immunocompromised patients or to guide prophylactic therapy. CMV-IGRA can quantify CMV cell-mediated immunity by measuring the IFN-γ that is released by CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in the presence of CMV antigens. However, the 2 most widely used CMV-IGRAs, T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, had not yet been compared in the setting of an allo-HSCT. In the present study, we performed a method comparison between T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV at 28 days and 100 days post-allo-HSCT, and to assess predictive values of both tests for CMV reactivation. Twenty-seven patients were included in a bicentric prospective trial. Samples were obtained on days +28 and +100 post-allo-HSCT, and patients' clinical information was collected up to day +270 post-HSCT. Comparisons of methods were performed using Cohen's κ. On day +28 (n = 26) post-allo-HSCT, T-SPOT.CMV yielded 3 positive test results and QuantiFERON-CMV yielded 2 positive results. On day +100 (n = 24), T-SPOT.CMV produced 7 positive test results, and QuantiFERON-CMV produced 9. One discordant result was obtained at day +28 (n = 26), and 6 discordant results were obtained at day +100 (n = 24). Method comparison showed a strong agreement on day +28 (κ = .780; 95% confidence interval [CI], .366 to 1.000) but only a moderate agreement on day +100 (κ = .442; 95% CI, .070 to .814) and in pooled data from both time points (κ = .578; 95% CI, .300-.856). Four clinically significant CMV infections (CS-CMVi) were observed, all occurring after discontinuation of letermovir prophylaxis. None of those 4 patients had a positive result with either test at day +100 (or day +28). Thus, the negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity were very high, at 100% for both tests measured at day +100. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and specificity were considerably lower at day +100 (T-SPOT.CMV: PPV, 23.5%; specificity, 35%; QuantiFERON-CMV: PPV, 26.7%; specificity, 45%). T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV had only moderate agreement (at day +100) after allo-HSCT. Although these IGRAs are very promising, as shown by their very high NPVs for protection against CS-CMVi, they are not interchangeable. Future research should stipulate which IGRA was used, and future guidelines preferably should be assay-specific. As QuantiFERON-CMV still lacks a large post-allo-HSCT validation study, the moderate agreement with T-SPOT.CMV poses a significant hurdle in the routine implementation of this test.

Pilot study of oral fluid and plasma meropenem and piperacillin concentrations in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ß-lactam antibiotics may be used to optimize dosing for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). A noninvasive matrix such as oral fluid may be interesting in selected patient groups. We compared the oral fluid concentrations of piperacillin and meropenem with the respective unbound and total concentrations in plasma. A secondary objective was to evaluate feasibility of the collection of oral fluid samples in this specific patient population. METHODS: The study included 20 non-intubated ICU patients, age 22 to 77 y, receiving piperacillin or meropenem via continuous intravenous infusion. The standard protocol consisted of collecting a paired plasma-oral fluid sample for 3 consecutive days. Oral fluid was obtained from the patients using a standardized procedure by spitting in a plastic container after 2 min of gathering oral fluid in the mouth. RESULTS: Antibiotic concentrations of piperacillin and meropenem are measurable, albeit very low, in unstimulated oral fluid of ICU patients. For piperacillin, a poor correlation was found between oral fluid and both total and unbound plasma concentrations (Spearman's correlation coefficients (Rs) 0.46 and 0.48 respectively). For meropenem this correlation was better (Rs for oral fluid versus total and unbound plasma meropenem concentration 0.92 and 0.93 respectively). Dispersion of antibiotic concentrations was greater in oral fluid than in blood. Collecting oral fluid samples was difficult in non-intubated ICU patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oral fluid from non-intubated ICU patients, obtained through a standardized procedure, cannot be recommended as an alternative matrix for quantitative meropenem or piperacillin TDM.

Pitfalls of rubella serology while on the brink of elimination: evaluation of national data, Belgium, 2017.

BackgroundIn Belgium, rubella serology is frequently requested in women of childbearing age, despite high vaccination coverage and a near-absence of congenital rubella cases. Different test kits are available and should be standardised by an international standard preparation.AimTo analyse and compare rubella serology practices in Belgian laboratories.MethodsAs part of the mandatory External Quality Assessment programme for rubella serology in Belgium, the national public health institute, Sciensano, sent a voluntary questionnaire concerning anti-rubella IgM/IgG analyses in women aged 15 to 45 years in 2017 to 130 laboratories.ResultsThe questionnaire response rate was 83.8% (109/130). The majority of 169,494 IgG analyses were performed on Roche (55%), Abbott (17%) and Diasorin (13%) analysers. Not all laboratories used the proposed international cut-off of 10 IU/mL. Assumed median seroprevalence ranged from 76.3% with Liaison (Diasorin) to 96.3% with Modular (Roche). Despite very low rubella incidence in Belgium, 93 laboratories performed 85,957 IgM analyses, with 748 positive and 394 grey zone results. The National Reference Centre for Measles, Mumps and Rubella virus and the National Reference Centre for Congenital infections did not confirm any positive rubella cases in 2017.ConclusionThis retrospective analysis shows that rubella serology results may differ considerably according to the assay used. It is therefore important to use the same test when comparing results or performing follow-up testing. The number of anti-rubella IgM analyses was very high. Incorrect use of IgM for screening women of childbearing age can lead to unwarranted anxiety and overuse of confirmation tests.

Measuring Unbound Versus Total Piperacillin Concentrations in Plasma of Critically Ill Patients: Methodological Issues and Relevance.

BACKGROUND: Piperacillin is considered a moderately protein-bound antibiotic (20%-40%), with albumin being an important binding protein. Although infrequently used in practice, different methods to measure the fraction unbound (fu) are available, but uncertainty remains as to what the most appropriate method is. The main goal of this study was to estimate the impact of the methodology used to measure unbound piperacillin in plasma on the fu of piperacillin; we compared ultrafiltration (UF) at 4°C and 37°C with the reference method, equilibrium dialysis. In addition, we analyzed the impact of other proteins on the fu. METHODS: Anonymized left-over Li-heparin plasma samples (n = 41) from 30 critically ill patients who were treated with piperacillin were used for the analyses. RESULTS: We found that the piperacillin fu, determined by UF, is on average 8% higher at 37°C (91%) than at 4°C (83%). There were no systematic or proportional differences between UF at 4°C and equilibrium dialysis at 4°C. This emphasizes the importance of the temperature during UF, which should therefore be clearly stated in publications that report on the methodology of UF. No significant impact of the albumin-, IgA-, total protein-, or α1-acid glycoprotein concentration on the fu was found. The fu found in this study was higher than the generally assumed fu value of 60%-80%. A possible explanation lies in the studied population or in the temperature used. Based on our results, routine monitoring of unbound piperacillin in intensive care unit patients is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the prediction model, we can state that in intensive care patients the fu of piperacillin is 91% (SD 7%), determined with UF at 37°C.

Impact of vancomycin protein binding on target attainment in critically ill children: back to the drawing board?

Objectives: The objectives of this observational study were to investigate plasma protein binding and to evaluate target attainment rates of vancomycin therapy in critically ill children. Patients and methods: Paediatric ICU patients, in whom intravenous intermittent dosing (ID) or continuous dosing (CD) with vancomycin was indicated, were included. Covariates on unbound vancomycin fraction and concentration were tested using a linear mixed model analysis and attainment of currently used pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets was evaluated. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02456974. Results: One hundred and eighty-eight plasma samples were collected from 32 patients. The unbound vancomycin fraction (median = 71.1%; IQR = 65.4%-79.7%) was highly variable within and between patients and significantly correlated with total protein and albumin concentration, which were both decreased in our population. Total trough concentration (ID) and total concentration (CD) were within the aimed target concentrations in 8% of patients. The targets of AUC/MIC ≥400 and f AUC/MIC ≥200 were achieved in 54% and 83% of patients, respectively. Unbound vancomycin concentrations were adequately predicted using the following equation: unbound vancomycin concentration (mg/L) = 5.38 + [0.71 × total vancomycin concentration (mg/L)] - [0.085 × total protein concentration (g/L)]. This final model was externally validated using 51 samples from another six patients. Conclusions: The protein binding of vancomycin in our paediatric population was lower than reported in non-critically ill adults and exhibited large variability. Higher target attainment rates were achieved when using PK/PD indices based on unbound concentrations, when compared with total concentrations. These results highlight the need for protein binding assessment in future vancomycin PK/PD research.